Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1956 Cases
423 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Girard Lodge No. 100 v. Grand Lodge
No. 994. Girard Lodge No. 100 et al. v. Grand Lodge, Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, et al. George Morris Fay, Lawrence J. Bichette and John P. Burke for petitioners. Allen S. Olmsted, 2nd, and Walter Biddle Saul for respondent.
Burnett v. Graves
No. 945. Burnett et al. v. Graves et al. Joseph T. Enright for petitioners. Charles L. Black for respondents.
Otten v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co.
No. 926. Otten v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co. et al. Leone Pecoraro for petitioner. Edwin H. Burgess and Sydney B. Prince, Jr. for the Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co., and Milton Kramer and Lester P. Schoene for the Inte
Brown v. Pizer
No. 510. Brown et al. v. Pizer et al. Ben Margolis for petitioners. Robert R. Rissman, Fred O brand and Arthur J. Goldberg for respondents.
United States v. Allen-Bradley Co.
No. 923. United States v. Allen-Bradley Co. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Rice and Hilbert P. Zarky for the United States. Harvey W. Peters for respondent.
United States v. Shotwell Manufacturing Co.
No. 470. No. 471. United States v. Shotwell Manufacturing Co. et al.; and Shotwell Manufacturing Co. et al. v. United States. Solicitor General SobelojJ for the United States, movant. Harold A. Smith and Howard Ellis for petitioners in No.
United States v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.
No. 151. United States v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. et al. Solicitor General Sobeloff and Assistant Attorney General Barnes for the United States. John Lord O’Brian, Hugh B. Cox and Charles A. Horsky for the E. I. du Pont de Nemours &
United States v. Louisiana
No. 15, Original. United States v. Louisiana. Attorney General Brownell, Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Rankin, Oscar H. Davis and John F. Davis for the United States, plaintiff. Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney Gener
Gross v. California
No. 780, Misc. Gross v. California.
Sword Line, Inc. v. United States
June 11, 1956. No. 861. Sword Line, Inc., v. United States. Theodore J. Breitwieser for petitioner. Solicitor General Sobeloff for the United States.
De Sylva v. Ballentine
De SYLVA v. BALLENTINE, GUARDIAN. No. 529. Argued April 25-26, 1956. Decided June 11, 1956. Theodore Kiendl argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Pat A. McCormick and John H. Cleary, Jr. Max Fink argued the cause for re
Cole v. Young
COLE v. YOUNG et al. No. 442. Argued March 6, 1956. Decided June 11, 1956. David I. Shapiro argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were James H. Heller and Osmond K. Fraenkel. Donald B. MacGuineas argued the cause for respon
Czaplicki v. Hoegh Silvercloud
CZAPLICKI v. THE HOEGH SILVERCLOUD et al. No. 342. Argued April 24, 1956. Decided June 11, 1956. Bernard Chazen argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Nathan Baker. James M. Estabrook argued the cause for The Hoegh Silve
Parr v. United States
PARR v. UNITED STATES. No. 320. Argued March 28, 1956. Decided June 11, 1956. Everett L. Looney and Abe Fortas argued the cause for petitioner. With them on the brief in No. 320 and the motion in No. 202, Misc., were Thurman Arnold, Marvin
Reed v. Pennsylvania Railroad
REED v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO. No. 621. Argued May 1, 1956. Decided June 11, 1956. Joseph S. Lord, III, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Theodore Yoorhees argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Phil
Southern Pacific Co. v. Gileo
SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. v. GILEO et al. No. 257. Argued May 1, 1956. Decided June 11, 1956. Arthur B. Dunne argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Horace B. Wulff. Clifton Hilderbrand argued the cause for Gileo et al., resp
Reid v. Covert
REID, SUPERINTENDENT, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JAIL, v. COVERT. No. 701. Argued May 3, 1956. Decided June 11, 1956. Marvin E. Frankel argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney Gene
Kinsella v. Krueger
KINSELLA, WARDEN, v. KRUEGER. No. 713. Argued May 3, 1956. Decided June 11, 1956. Marvin E. Frankel argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg
United States ex rel. Darcy v. Handy
UNITED STATES ex rel. DARCY v. HANDY, WARDEN, et al. No. 323. Argued May 1-2, 1956. Decided June 11, 1956. Charles J. Margiotti argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Morton Witkin. Frank P. Lawley, Jr., Deputy Attorney
Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.
COLD METAL PROCESS CO. et al. v. UNITED ENGINEERING & FOUNDRY CO. No. 76. Argued February 28, 1956. Decided June 11, 1956. William H. Webb argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Clarence B. Zewadski and William Wallace
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Mackey
SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO. v. MACKEY et al. No. 34. Argued February 28, 1956. Decided June 11, 1956. Walter J. Rockier argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Edward I. Rothschild argued the cause for respondents. With him on a brief f
United States v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.
UNITED STATES v. E. I. du PONT de NEMOURS & CO. No. 5. Argued October 11, 1955. Decided June 11, 1956. Charles H. Weston argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General SobelojJ, Assistant Attorney Gener
Jay v. Boyd
JAY v. BOYD, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE. No. 503. Argued May 3, 1956. Decided June 11, 1956. Will Maslow and John Caughlan argued the cause for petitioner. On the brief were Mr. Caughlan and Norman Leonard. John
Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad v. Union Pacific Railroad
DENVER & RIO GRANDE WESTERN RAILROAD CO. v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. et al. No. 117. Argued April 23-24, 1956. Decided June 11, 1956. Frank E. Holman argued the causes for the Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co. With him on the brief
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.