Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1957 Cases
480 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United Mail Order, Warehouse & Retail Employees Union, Local 20 v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
No. 646. United Mail Order, Warehouse & Retail Employees Union, Local 20, et al. v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. Francis Heisley for petitioners. David L. Dickson for respondent.
Precision Scientific Co. v. International Union of Mine, Mill & Smelter Workers
No. 76. Precision Scientific Co. v. International Union of Mine, Mill and Smelter Workers. Barnabas F. Sears and James M. Barnes for petitioner. Nathan Witt, Joseph Forer and David Rein for respondent.
Ford v. United States
No. 258, Misc. Ford v. United States. John P. Lomenzo and Sydney R. Rubin for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin and Assistant Attorney General Rice for the United States.
Williams v. Schneckloth
No. 373, No. 403, No. 404, No. 414, No. 423, No. 431, No. 436, No. 438, No. 452, No. 453, No. 456, No. 501, No. 521, No. 524, Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Williams v. Schneckloth, Super
Shotwell Manufacturing Co. v. United States
No. 10. Shotwell Manufacturing Co. et al. v. United States. Harold A. Smith and Howard Ellis for the Shotwell Manufacturing Co. et ah, petitioners. Simon E. Sobeloff, then Solicitor General, Solicitor General Rankin and Assistant Attorney G
Favors v. Coiner
No. 719. Favors v. Coiner, Acting Warden.
Leonard v. United States
No. 510. Leonard v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Rankin for the United States.
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, Local Lodge No. 721
No. 84. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, Local Lodge No. 721, et al. John B. Miller for petitioner. Benning M. Grice and Wayland K. Sullivan for respondents.
Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.
No. 632. Lawlor et al., trading as Independent Poster Exchange, v. National Screen Service Corp. Francis T. Anderson for petitioners. Louis Nizer for respondent.
Texas v. New Mexico
February 25, 1957. No. 9, Original. Texas v. New Mexico et al. Will Wilson, Attorney General, Will Davis, Assistant Attorney General, and Eugene T. Edwards, Special Assistant Attorney General, for the State of Texas, plaintiff. Fred M. Stan
Ferguson v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.
FERGUSON v. MOORE-McCORMACK LINES, INC. No. 59. Argued December 10, 1956. Decided February 25, 1957. George J. Engelman argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. William A. Wilson argued the cause for respondent. With him on the br
Herdman v. Pennsylvania Railroad
HERDMAN v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO. No. 46. Argued December 4, 1956. Decided February 25, 1957. Donald S. McNamara argued the cause for petitioner. On the brief was J. Paul McNamara. John A. Eckler argued the cause for respondent. With him
Webb v. Illinois Central Railroad
WEBB v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. No. 42. Argued December 3, 1956. Decided February 25, 1957. Robert J. Rafferty argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Carl L. Yaeger. Herbert J. Deany argued the cause for respondent
Rogers v. Missouri Pacific Railroad
ROGERS v. MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. No. 28. Argued November 7, 1956. Decided February 25, 1957. Mark D. Eagleton argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Eugene K. Buckley. Donald B. Sommers argued the cause for respon
Pennsylvania Railroad v. Rychlik
PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO. et al. v. RYCHLIK. No. 56. Argued December 10-11, 1956. Decided February 25, 1957. Richard N. Clattenburg argued the cause for the Pennsylvania Railroad Co., petitioner. With him on the brief were John B. Prizer, P
United States Gypsum Co. v. National Gypsum Co.
UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO. v. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. et al. No. 11. Argued November 5-6, 1956. Decided February 25, 1957. Bruce Bromley argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Cranston Spray, Robert C. Keck and Hugh Lynch, Jr.
Radovich v. National Football League
RADOVICH v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al. No. 94. Argued January 17, 1957. Decided February 25, 1957. Maxwell Keith argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Joseph L. Alioto and Elwood S. Kendrick. Philip Elman argued t
Breithaupt v. Abram
BREITHAUPT v. ABRAM, WARDEN. No. 69. Argued December 12-13, 1956. Decided February 25, 1957. F. Gordon Shermack, acting under appointment by the Court, 352 U. S. 1032, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Richard H. Robinson,
Federal Trade Commission v. National Lead Co.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. NATIONAL LEAD CO. et al. No. 63. Argued December 12, 1956. Decided February 25, 1957. Earl W. Kintner argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney Gener
United States v. Turley
UNITED STATES v. TURLEY. No. 289. Argued January 24, 1957. Decided February 25, 1957. Roger D. Fisher argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Olney and Beatrice Rosenber
Nilva v. United States
NILVA v. UNITED STATES. No. 37. Argued November 8, 13, 1956. Decided February 25, 1957. Eugene Oressman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was John W. Graff. Richard J. Blanchard argued the cause for the United States. W
Butler v. Michigan
BUTLER v. MICHIGAN. No. 16. Argued October 16, 1956. Decided February 25, 1957. Manuel Lee Bobbins argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was William O. Comb. Edmund E. Shepherd, Solicitor General of Michigan, argued the caus
Senko v. LaCrosse Dredging Corp.
SENKO v. LaCROSSE DREDGING CORP. No. 62. Argued December 12, 1956. Decided February 25, 1957. George J. Moran argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Stanley M. Rosenblum. Stuart B. Bradley argued the cause for respondent
Pollard v. United States
POLLARD v. UNITED STATES. No. 38. Argued December 3, 1956. Decided February 25, 1957. Bennett Boskey, acting under appointment by the Court, 350 U. S. 980, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Philip Elman argued the cause for
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.