Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1957 Cases
480 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Daniel v. United States
No. 594. Daniel v. United States. Neil Brans for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub and Samuel D. Slade for the United States.
Texas Co. v. Federal Power Commission
No. 583. Texas Company v. Federal Power Commission. Roger J. Whitejord, John J. Wilson and Edward M. Freeman for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Melvin Richter, William W. Ross, Willard W. Gatchell and
Rosenblum v. United States
No. 576. No. 577. Rosenblum v. United States; and Ansell et al. v. United States. Frederick H. Block for petitioner in No. 576. Bernard Austin for petitioners in No. 577. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice and Joseph
Kus v. United States
No. 553. Kus v. United States. Peter Fitzpatrick and Gerald M. Chapman for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub and Samuel D. Slade for the United States.
Interstate Power Co. v. Federal Power Commission
No. 459. No. 476. Interstate Power Co. et al. v. Federal Power Commission et al.; and Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al. Miles Lord, Attorney General, and Joseph J. Bright, Assistant Attorney General, for the State
International Ass'n of Machinists v. Gonzales
No. 539. International Association of Machinists et al. v. Gonzales. Plato E. Papps for petitioners.
Kernan v. American Dredging Co.
No. 557. Kernan, Administrator, et al. v. American Dredging Co. Abraham E. Freedman for petitioners. T. E. Byrne, Jr. and Mark D. Alspach for respondent.
Roth v. United States
No. 582. Roth v. United States. David von G. Albrecht, David P. Siegel and Peter Belsito for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Olney and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
United States v. Township of Muskegon
No. 564. United States v. Township of Muskegon et al. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice, Hilbert P. Zarky and Lyle M. Turner for the United States. Harold M. Street for appellees, and Robert A. Cavanaugh for Muskegon
Cooper v. United States
No. 406, Misc. Cooper v. United States. Wade H. Cooper, pro se. Solicitor General Rankin for the United States.
Davis v. United States
No. 360, Misc. Davis v. United States.
United States v. Newmarket Manufacturing Co.
No. 216. United States v. Newmarket Manufacturing Co. Louis Eisenstein for movant.
Ladner v. United States
No. 568. Ladner v. United States.
Wisconsin Electric Power Co. v. City of Milwaukee
No. 404. Wisconsin Electric Power Co. v. City of Milwaukee.
Spielvogel v. Ford
No. 588. Spielvogel v. Ford, Commissioner, Department of Water Supply, Gas and Electricity of the City of New York, et al. Herman J. Zawin and I. Stanley Stein for appellant. Peter Campbell Brown, Seymour B. Quel and Anthony Cur-reri for ap
Jaffke v. Dunham
JAFFKE v. DUNHAM, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY. No. 60. Argued December 12, 1956. Decided January 14, 1957. Herbert J. Miller, Jr. argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Chauncey P. Carter, Jr. and William M. Giffin. G. W. Hor
Soriano v. United States
SORIANO v. UNITED STATES. No. 49. Argued December 5, 1956. Decided January 14, 1957. Prew Savoy and George W. Foley argued the cause for petitioner. On the brief were Mr. Savoy and Jay Pfotenhauer. Roger D. Fisher argued the cause for the U
La Buy v. Howes Leather Co.
La BUY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE, v. HOWES LEATHER CO., INC., et al. No. 27. Argued October 17-18, 1956. Decided January 14, 1957. James A. Sprowl argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Edward R. Johnston. Jack I. Le
Paoli v. United States
DELLI PAOLI v. UNITED STATES. No. 33. Argued October 18, 1956. Decided January 14, 1957. Daniel H. Greenberg argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. J. F. Bishop argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were
Leiter Minerals, Inc. v. United States
LEITER MINERALS, INC., v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 26. Argued November 6-7, 1956. Decided January 14, 1957. Samuel W. Planché, Jr. argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Assistant Attorney General Morton argued the cause for the
United States v. Howard
UNITED STATES v. HOWARD, trading as STOKES FISH CO. No. 52. Argued December 6, 1956. Decided January 14, 1957. Leonard B. Sand argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney G
United States v. Plesha
UNITED STATES v. PLESHA et al. No. 39. Argued November 8, 1956. Decided January 14, 1957. Lester S. Jayson argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Samuel
Fikes v. Alabama
FIKES v. ALABAMA. No. 53. Argued December 6, 1956. Decided January 14, 1957. Jack Greenberg argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Peter A. Hall and Orzell Bil-lingsley. Robert Straub, Special Assistant Attorney General
Home Utilities Co. v. Eastman Kodak Co.
January 12, 1957. No. 266. Home Utilities Co., Inc., v. Eastman Kodak Co. Melvin J. Sykes for petitioner. David R. Owen for respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.