Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1957 Cases
480 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Eisenberg v. Central Zone Property Corp.
No. 500. Eisenberg v. Central Zone Property Corp. et al. Cer-tiorari denied. Emil K. Ellis for petitioner. Simon H. Rijkind for the Central Zone Property Corporation, respondent.
American Bitumuls & Asphalt Co. v. United States
No. 493. American Bitumuls & Asphalt Co. et al. v. United States. Grace M. Stewart for the American Bitumuls & Asphalt Co., petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Samuel D. Slade and Herman Marcuse for the Un
Moore v. Brown
No. 480. Moore et al. v. Brown, Executrix. Milton W. Lamproplos for petitioners. Melvin M. Belli for respondent.
Kent v. Dulles
No. 481. Kent et al. v. Dulles, Secretary of State. Leonard B. Boudin, Victor Rabinowitz and David Rein for petitioners. Daniel G. Marshall for Briehl, petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin for respondent.
In re Latimer
IN RE LATIMER. No. 147, Misc. Decided November 25, 1957. John L. Kilcullen for petitioner.
Rosenbloom v. United States
ROSENBLOOM v. UNITED STATES. No. 451. Decided November 25, 1957. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice and Joseph F. Goetten for the United States.
Yates v. United States
YATES v. UNITED STATES. No. 2. Argued October 9-10, 1956. — Restored to the calendar for reargument June 10, 1957. — Reargued October 22, 1957. Decided November 25, 1957. Leo Brcmton, Jr. argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the bri
Hugh Breeding, Inc. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad
No. 513. Hugh Breeding, Inc., v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co. Peyton Ford and Gus Rinehart for petitioner. John A. Johnson and Robert E. Shelton for respondent.
Legg v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n
No. 180, Misc. Legg v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Association of Omaha.
Young v. Hughes
No. 474. Young v. Hughes, District Judge. John G. Hervey and Olenn 0. Young for petitioner.
Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. New York Central Railroad
No. 452. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen et al. v. New York Central Railroad Co. Joseph A. Robie and Edward J. Hickey, Jr. for petitioners. Harold Heiss for the Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen, and Wayland K. Sullivan for the
United States v. Louisiana
No. 11, Original. United States v. Louisiana et al. Solicitor General Rankin filed the amended complaint for the United States. Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General, for the State of Louisiana, John Patterson, Attorney General, William G
Turner v. Wright
TURNER v. WRIGHT, TREASURER OF ILLINOIS, et al. No. 405. Decided November 18, 1957. Amos M. Matthews for appellant in No. 405. Melvin B. Lewis for appellants in No. 470. E. H. McDermott and Richard S. Oldberg for appellant in No. 482. Latha
American Public Power Ass'n v. Power Authority of New York
AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION et al. v. POWER AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK et al. No. 477. Decided November 18, 1957. Northcutt Ely and Robert L. McCarthy for petitioners. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General, and John R. Davison, Solicitor Ge
City of Nashville v. United States
CITY OF NASHVILLE et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 365. Decided November 18, 1957 Allison B. Humphreys, Harold Seligman and William Waller for appellants in No. 365. Judson Harwood for appellants in No. 519. Solicitor General Rankin and R
Stinson v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
STINSON, ADMINISTRATRIX, v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD CO. No. 442. Decided November 18, 1957. Joseph S. Lord, III for petitioner. Peyton D. Bibb and Norman C. Shepard for respondent.
Lee You Fee v. Dulles
LEE YOU FEE v. DULLES, SECRETARY OF STATE. No. 58. Decided November 18, 1957. Jack Wasserman for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General McLean, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for respondent.
Poret v. Sigler
PORET et al. v. SIGLER, WARDEN. No. 268, Misc. Decided November 18, 1957. G. W. Gill and Gerard H. Schreiber for petitioners.
In re Lamkin
IN RE LAMKIN. No. 275, Misc. Decided November 18, 1957. Petitioner pro se. Will Wilson, Attorney General, and E. M. DeGeurin and George P. Blackburn, Assistant Attorneys General, filed a brief for the State of Texas in opposition to the pet
Williams v. Simons
WILLIAMS, GOVERNOR OF MICHIGAN, et al. v. SIMONS, CHIEF JUDGE, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, et al. No. 74, Misc. Decided November 18, 1957. G. Mennen Williams, Governor of Michigan, Thomas M. Kavanagh, Attorney Gene
Conley v. Gibson
CONLEY et al. v. GIBSON et al. No. 7. Argued October 21, 1957. Decided November 18, 1957. Joseph C. Waddy argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Roberson L. King, Robert L. Carter, William C. Gardner and William B. Bry
Hollis v. Ellis
No. 189, Misc. Hollis v. Ellis, General Manager, Texas Prison System, et al.
Lee v. Gough
No. 114, Misc. Lee v. Gough, Warden.
Sobell v. United States
Nos. 440 and 441. Sobell v. United States. Frank J. Donner, Arthur Kinoy, Marshall Perlin and Benjamin Dreyfus for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Tompkins, Philip R. Monahan and Carl G. Cohen for the United
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.