Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1958 Cases
536 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
McBride v. Culver
No. 82, Misc. McBride v. Culver, State Prison Custodian. Petitioner pro se. Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, David U. Tumin, Assistant Attorney General, and Edward S. Jafjry, Special Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Sheet Metal Workers International Ass'n v. Sheet Metal Contractors Ass'n
No. 656. Sheet Metal Workers International Association et al. v. Sheet Metal Contractors Association of San Francisco et al. Clarence M. Mulholland for petitioners. George 0. Bahrs for respondents.
Rietmann v. Barber
No. 604. Rietmann v. Barber, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service. Joseph S. Hertogs and Arthur J. Phelan for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General McLean and Beatrice Rosenberg for res
Pinataro v. Appellate Division of the Supreme Court
No. 331, No. 351, Misc. Misc. Pinataro v. Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department; and Pinataro v. Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Judicial Department.
Sunshine Book Co. v. Summerfield
SUNSHINE BOOK CO. et al. v. SUMMERFIELD, POSTMASTER GENERAL. No. 587. Decided January 13, 1958. 0. John Rogge for petitioners. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub and Samuel D. Slade for respondent.
One, Inc., v. Olesen
ONE, INCORPORATED, v. OLESEN, POSTMASTER OF LOS ANGELES. No. 290. Decided January 13, 1958. Eric Julber for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Leonard and Samuel D. Slade for respondent.
Southern Railway Co. v. United States
SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 579. Decided January 13, 1958. Henry L. Walker, Arthur J. Dixon, James A. Bistline and R. Granville Curry for appellants. John W. Adams, Jr., Charles P. Reynolds, R. B. Clay-tor, Marti
Gordon v. Texas
GORDON v. TEXAS. No. 71. Argued January 9, 1958. Decided January 13, 1958. B. R. Stewart argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant. C. K. Richards, Assistant Attorney General of Texas, argued the cause for respondent. With,him on the
Reeves v. Alabama
REEVES v. ALABAMA. No. 66. Argued January 8-9, 1958. Decided January 13, 1958. Peter A. Hall and Orzell Billingsley, Jr. argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. William F. Thetford and Robert B. Stewart argued the cause for respo
Lawn v. United States
LAWN v. UNITED STATES. No. 9. Argued October 14, 1957. Decided January 13, 1958. Milton Pollack argued the cause for petitioner in No. 9. With him on the brief were Francis E. Koch, Brainerd Currie and Philip B. Kurland. Joseph Leary Delane
Staub v. City of Baxley
STAUB v. CITY OF BAXLEY. No. 48. Argued November 18-19, 1957. Decided January 13, 1958. Morris P. Glushien argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Ed Pearce and Bernard Dunau. J. H. Highsmith argued the cause and filed a
Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. Illinois
CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL & PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. v. ILLINOIS et al. No. 12. Argued November 12, 1957. Decided January 13, 1958. R. K. Merrill argued the cause for appellant in No. 12. With him on the brief were W. J. Quinn and Edwin R. E
United States v. Sharpnack
UNITED STATES v. SHARPNACK. No. 35. Argued October 29, 1957. Decided January 13, 1958. Beatrice Rosenberg argued the cause for the United States. With her on the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Warren Olney, III, then Assistant Attorne
First Iowa Hydro Electric Cooperative v. Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric Co.
No. 457. First Iowa Hydro Electric Cooperative et al. v. Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric Co. et al.,
La Marca v. New York
No. 397, Misc. La Marca v. New York. Joseph Lonardo and Philip Huntington for petitioner.
Etherton v. United States
No. 258, Misc. Etherton v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General McLean and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Pettway v. United States
No. 229, Misc. Pettway v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General McLean, Beatrice Rosenberg and Felicia Dubrovsky for the United States.
Millwood v. Heinze
No. 198, Misc. Millwood v. Heinze, Warden.
Chapman v. California
No. 138, Misc. Chapman v. California.
Nishida v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
No. 615. Nishida et al., doing business as Hilo Dairy Company of Kauai, et al. v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. Roger E. Brooks and C. Nils Tavares for petitioners. Earl T. Thomas and Carl E. Geuther for respondent. Mr. Justice Harlan took
North American Aviation, Inc. v. Hughes
No. 601. North American Aviation, Inc., v. Hughes et al. Albert Lee Stephens, Jr. and Glendon Tremaine for respondents.
Purdom v. United States
No. 603. Purdom v. United States. Joseph P. Jenkins for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General McLean and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Eaton v. Missouri
No. 432. Eaton v. Missouri. Petitioner pro se. John M. Dalton, Attorney General of Missouri, and Aubrey R. Hammett, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Pritchard v. Gladden
No. 39, No. 201, Misc. Misc. Pritchard v. Gladden, Warden; and Gilpin v. United States.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.