Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1959 Cases
510 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
New York ex rel. Smith v. Martin
No. 285, Misc. New York ex rel. Smith v. Martin, Warden. Petitioner pro se. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, and Winifred C. Stanley, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Ashcraft v. United States
No. 288, Misc. Ashcraft v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Collins v. Risner
No. 508. Collins v. Risner, doing business as Capital Trucking Co. Thomas E. McCutchen, Jr. for petitioner.
United States v. Cannelton Sewer Pipe Co.
No. 513. United States v. Cannelton Sewer Pipe Co. Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Hefjron, Ralph S. Spritzer and Melva M. Graney for the United States. Howard P. Travis for respondent.
Bonilla v. New York
No. 471, Misc. Bonilla v. New York.
King v. Consolidated Underwriters
KING v. CONSOLIDATED UNDERWRITERS No. 273, Misc. Decided December 14, 1959. Richard E. McDaniel for appellant. Fred Hull, for appellee.
Faubus v. Aaron
FAUBUS, GOVERNOR OF ARKANSAS, v. AARON et al. No.458. Decided December 14, 1959 Thomas Harper and Walter L. Pope for appellant in No. 458. Bruce Bennett, Attorney General of Arkansas, and Ben J. Harrison, Chief Assistant Attorney General, f
Public Service Commission v. Federal Power Commission
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION et al. No. 459. Decided December 14, 1959 Kent H. Brown and George H. Kenny for petitioner in No. 459. J. David Mann, Jr. and J. Louis Monarch for United Gas Imp
Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. United States
MINNEAPOLIS & ST. LOUIS RAILWAY CO. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 12. Argued November 16-17, 1959. Decided December 14, 1959 Max Swiren and Harold J. Soderberg argued the cause for appellants.. Max Swiren, John G. Dorsey and Richard Musenbroc
Smith v. California
SMITH v. CALIFORNIA. No. 9. Argued October 20, 1959. Decided December 14, 1959. Stanley Fleishman and Sam Rosenwein argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant. Roger Arnebergh argued the cause for appellee. With him oh the brief was P
Inman v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
INMAN v. BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD CO. No. 36. Argued November 12, 1959. Decided December 14, 1959. Raymond J. McGowan argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. William A. Kelly argued the caúse'for respondent. On' the brief were C
Braen v. Pfeifer Oil Transportation Co.
BRAEN v. PFEIFER OIL TRANSPORTATION CO., INC. No. 32. Argued November 16, 1959. Decided December 14, 1959. Benjamin H.-Siff argued' the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Bernard Rolnick. Arthur N. Seijj was of counsel for peti
Dupree v. United States
No. 172. No. 292. No. 312. No. 366. No. 296, No. 306, No. 379, Dupree v. United States, Keenan et al. v. United States, Gentry v. United States, Carter Products, Inc., v. Federal Trade Commission, Morris v. Nowotny et al., Johnson v. United
Manchester v. Heinze
No. 331, Misc. Manchester v. Heinze, Warden, et al.
Davis v. United States
No. 456. Davis v. United States. Frank J. Donner for peti-tionér. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney ■General Yeagley and Kevin T. Maroney for the United States.
Worthy v. Herter
No. 444. Worthy v. Herter, Secretary of State. William, M. Kunstl^r and Walter E. Dillon, Jr. for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Yeagley, John F. Davis and Kevin T. Maroney for respondent.
Quaker State Oil Refining Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
No. 498. Quaker State Oil Refining Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board. John C. Bane, Jr. and Benjamin G. McFate for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, .Stuart Roth-man, Thomas J. McDermott, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for
Warren v. United States
No. 463. Warren et al. v. United States. John E. McClure and William P. McClure for petitioners. Solicitor General Ban-kin, Assistant Attorney General Rice and Melva M. Graney for the United States.
Schreiber v. American Safety Table Co.
No. 486. Schreiber et al., trading as Schreiber & Goldberg, v. American Safety Table Co., Inc. Petitioners pro se. Leon Edelson for respondent.
Kizziar v. Dollar
No. 478. Kizziar et ux. v. Dollar, doing business as B. L. Dollar Construction Co. C. E. Hall for petitioners. Ross Rutherford for respondent.
Manaia v. Potomac Electric Power Co.
No. 397. Manaia et al. v. Potomac Electric Power Co. Sheldon E. Bern-" stein and Herbert M. Bruñe for petitioners. William B. Jones, Robert R. Bair and Cornelius Means for respondent.
Going v. Missouri
No. 199, Misc. Going v. Missouri. Petitioner pro se.. John M. Dalton, Attorney General of Missouri, for respondent.
Dyerr v. Securities & Exchange Commission
No. 269. Dyerr et al. v. Securities and Exchange Commission et al., J. Raymond Dyer for petitioners.
Hannah v. Larche
No. 549. No. 550. Hannah et al. v. Larche et al. Hannah et al. v. Slawson et al. Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Ryan and Harold H. Greene for appellants in No. 549 and petitioners in No. 550. : David Rubin also
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.