Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1959 Cases
510 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Power Authority of New York v. Tuscarora Indian Nation
No. 66. Power Authority of the State of New York v. Tuscarora Indian Nation. Thomas F. Moore, Jr. for petitioner-movant. Arthur Lazarus, Jr. for respondent.
Tri-City Broadcasting Co. v. Bowers
TRI-CITY BROADCASTING CO. v. BOWERS, TAX COMMISSIONER OF OHIO. No. 406. .Decided November 16, 1959. Carlton S. Dargiisch, Carlton S. Dargusch, Jr. and Jack ' H. Bertsch for appellant. Mark McElroy, Attorney. General of Ohio, and Joseph D. K
Commissioner v. Acker
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ACKER. No. 13. Argued October 19, 1959. Decided November 16, 1959. Ralph S. Spritzer argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice a
Sturdevant v. Settle
No. 116, Misc. Sturdevant v. Settle, Warden. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Ryan, Harold H. Greene and William A. Kehoe, Jr. for respondent.
Kumitis v. Pennsylvania
No. 315, Misc. Kumitis v. Pennsylvania.
Cecil v. United States
No. 274, Misc. Cecil et al. v. United States. Petitioners . pro se. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Wooten v. Bomar
No. 146, Misc. Wooten v. Bomar, Warden.
Appalachian Power Co. v. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
No. 388. Appalachian Power Co. et al. v. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants et al. Whitney North Seymour for petitioners. Howard C. Westwood, Fontaine C. Bradley, Stanley L. Temko and Robert L. Randall for respondents.
American Sign & Indicator Corp. v. Schulenburg
No. 380. American Sign and Indicator Corp. v. Schulenburg et al., doing business as Time-O-matic Company, et al. Albert Foster York for petitioner. Charles B. Spangen-berg for respondents.
Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Co. v. Johnson
No. 371. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Co. v. Johnson et al. Charles D. Egan and Benjamin C. King for petitioner. John M. Madison, Ned A. Stewart and Vernon W. Woods for respondents..'
Local Lodge 2040, International Ass'n of Machinists. v. Servel, Inc.
No. 364. Local Lodge 2040, International Association of Machinists, AFL-CIO, et al. v. Servel, Inc. Plato E. Papps and Sydney L. Berger for petitioners. Kenneth F. Burgess and Walter J. Cummings, Jr. for respondent.
Bedami v. Florida
No. 353. Bedami v. Florida. Pat' Whitaker for petitioner.
Novak v. Pennsylvania
No. 329. Novak v. Pennsylvania. Walter Stein and Mervyn R. Turk for petitioner.
New Hampshire Fire Insurance v. Scanlon
No. 339. New Hampshire Fire Insurance Co. v. Scanlon, District Director of Internal Revenue, et al. Myron Engel-man for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice, A. F. Prescott and Joseph Kovner for the District
Long v. Iowa
No. 346, No. 379, Mise. Long v. Iowa; and In re Coon. Mise.
Federal Trade Commission v. Broch
No. 61. Federal Trade Commission v. Henry Broch & Co. Henry J. Bison, Jr. for movant.-
Safeway Trails, Inc. v. United States
SAFEWAY TRAILS, INC., v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 375. Decided November 9, 1959. William A. Roberts and Maxwell A. Howell for appellant. Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Richard A. Solomon, John C. Danielso
Tahiti Bar, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board
TAHITI BAR, INC., v. PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD et al. No. 363. Decided November 9, 1959. Edwin P., Rome for appellant. Anne X. Alpem, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, Lois. G, Forer, Deputy Attorney General, George G. Lindsay, Assi
St. Johns Motor Express Co. v. United States
ST. JOHNS MOTOR EXPRESS CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 337. Decided November 9, 1959. Bryce Rea, Jr. for appellants. Solicitor, General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Richard A. Solomon, John C. Danielson and Rober
United States v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad
UNITED STATES v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILROAD CO. No. 10. Argued October 19, 1959. Decided November 9, 1959. John F. Davis argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General
United Steelworkers v. United States
UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 504. Argued November 3, 1959. Decided November 7, 1959. . Arthur 3. Goldberg argued the - cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were David E. Feller and Bernard Dunau. Solicit
United Steelworkers v. United States
October 30, 1959. No. 504. United Steelworkers of America v. United States. Arthur J. Goldberg, David E. Feller and Bernard Dunau for petitioner. Attorney General Rogers, Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Wayne G. B
Holmes v. Continental Casualty Co.
No. 346. Holmes v. Continental Casualty Co. et al. Francis H. Hare and Truman M. Hobbs for petitioner. ■ Reid B. Barnes •and James A. Simpson for Continental Casualty Co., respondent.
Superior Manufacturing Corp. v. Hessler Manufacturing Co.
No. 331. Superior Manufacturing Corp. v. Hessler Manufacturing Co. et al. Thomas K. Hudson for petitioner. William L. Bromberg and Edward Philip Kurz for respondents.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.