Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1959 Cases
510 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Richman Bros. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers
No. 85. Richman Brothers Co. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America et al. ' Victor DeMarco for petitioner. William J. Isaacson for respondents. '
Buford v. Texas
No. 293. Buford et al. v. Texas. Dan Moody and Fred W. Moore for petitioners. Will Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, and L. P. Lollar and Howard W. Mays, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
Block v. Bar Ass'n of Arkansas
No. 280. Block et al. v. Bar Association of Arkansas et al. Eugene B. Warren and Bruce T. Bullion for petitioners. Usco A. Gentry, John H. Lookadoo, J. M. Small-wood, Lamar Williamson, Terrell Marshall, Joe C. Barrett and Willis B. Smith fo
Dyer v. Securities & Exchange Commission
No. 269. Dyer et al. v. Securities and Exchange Commission et al. J. Raymond Dyer for petitioners. Solicitor General Rankin, Thomas G. Meeker, Solomon Freedman, Aaron Levy and Arthur Blasburg, Jr. for the Securities and Exchange Commission,
Padilla v. United States
No. 262. Padilla v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Perry v. North Carolina
No. 249. Perry v. North Carolina. Herman L. Taylor and Samuel S. Mitchell for petitioner. Malcolm B. Seawell, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Ralph Moody, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Badger Mutual Insurance v. Serio
No. 239. Badger Mutual Insurance Co. et al. v. Serio, doing business as Magnolia Canning Co. Thos. H. Watkins and Elizabeth Hulen .Grayson for petitioners. Malcolm B. Montgomery for respondent.
Wiley v. Commissioner
No. 233. Wiley et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. William Waller for petitioners.. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice, Meyer Rothwacks and Carolyn R. Just for respondent.
Keahey v. Texas
No. 224. Keahey v. Texas. Grover C. Morris for petitioner.
Traders Oil Co. of Houston v. National Labor Relations Board
No. 216. Traders Oil Co. of Houston v. National Labor Relations Board. H. Fletcher Brown fo. petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Stuart Rothman, Thomas J. McDermott and Dominick L. Manoli for respondent.
Carpenters Union, Local 131 v. Cisco Construction Co.
No. 206. Carpenters Union, Local 131, et al. v. Cisco Construction Co. Samuel B. Bassett for Carpenters Union, Local 131, et al., L. Presley Gill for Union of Operating Engineers, Local 302, and Roy E. Jackson for International Hod Carriers
De Simone v. United States
No. 201. De Simone v. United States. Emanuel Thebner and Abraham S. Robinson for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
In re Citroen
No. 189. In re Citroen. Henry A. Lowenberg for petitioner.
Armstrong v. United States
No. 190. Armstrong et al. v. United States. Donald S. Dawson for petitioners. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub and Samuel D. Slade for the United States.
Heath v. Commissioner
No. 177. Heath v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Watson Wash-burn for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Heffron and Robert N. Anderson for respondent.
Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Napoli
No. 166. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Napoli, doing business as Seven-Up Bottling Co. Anne X. Alpérn, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, ■Herbert N. Shenkin and Harry J. Rubin, Deputy Attorneys General, for petitioner. Jack J. Rosen
Gelb v. United States
No. 159. Gelb, alias Gordin, v. United States. Gertrude Gottlieb and Harry Salvan for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Robert S. Erdahl and Theodore jGeorge Gilinsky for the United States.
Crookham v. New York Central Railroad
No. 149. Crookham v. New York Central Railroad Co. J. G. F. Johnson and Ernest Franklin -Pauley for petitioner. Robert H. C. Kay for respondent.
Tisch v. Zable
No. 144. Tisch et al. v. Zable. Robert C. Ward and William G. Ward for petitioners. Claude Pepper and Alfred I. Hopkins for respondent.
Hohensee v. Ferguson
No. 129. Hohensee v. Ferguson et al. James C. Newton for petitioner. W. S. Moorhead, Jr. for Ferguson, respondent.
Holt v. Raleigh City Board of Education
No. 114. Holt et al. v. Raleigh City Board of Education. Herman L. Taylor, Samuel S. Mitchell and James.R. Walker, Jr. for petitioners. J. C. B. Ehringhaus, Jr. for respondent. Malcolm B. Seawell, Attorney General of North Carolina,- and Ra
Malfi v. United States
No. 107. Malfi v. United States. Jacob Kossman for petitioner. Solicitor General. Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
Custom Built Homes Co. v. Kansas State Commission of Revenue & Taxation
No. 96. Custom Built Homes Co., Inc., v. Kansas State Commission of Revenue and Taxation. Paul Van Osdol, Jr. for petitioner. Clarence J. Malone for respondent.
Magnolia Motor & Logging Co. v. United States
No. 90. Magnolia Motor & Logging Co. v. United States. Philip C. Wilkins and Richard N. Little for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General_ Wilkey, Robert S.'Erdahl and Eugene L. Grimm for the United States.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.