Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1961 Cases
544 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Carlo v. United States
No. 908. Carlo v. United States. George J. Todaro for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Jerome M. Feit for the United States.
Simonson v. Granquist
No. 919. Simonson, Trustee in Bankruptcy, et al. v. Granquist, District Director of Internal Revenue, et al. Arthur E. Simon and John F. Cramer, Jr. for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and I. Henry
Simcox v. Madigan
SIMCOX v. MADIGAN, WARDEN. No. 699, Misc. Decided June 5, 1961. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Doar, Harold H. Greene and David Rubin for respondent.
Mohegan International Corp. v. City of New York
MOHEGAN INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al. No. 902. Decided June 5, 1961. Gemid H. Ullman for appellant. Leo A. Larkin and Morris L. Heath for appellees.
Local 553, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board
LOCAL 553, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN & HELPERS OF AMERICA, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD. No. 844. Decided June 5, 1961. Samuel J. Cohen for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Stuart Rothman, Domin
Giant Tiger Drugs, Inc. v. Ohio
GIANT TIGER DRUGS, INC., v. OHIO. No. 807. Decided June 5, 1961. H. H. Felsman for appellant. John F. Ray, Jr. for appellee.
Payne v. Madigan
PAYNE v. MADIGAN, WARDEN. No. 180. Argued February 27, 1961. Decided June 5, 1961. Frederick M. Rowe, acting under appointment by the Court, 364 U. S. 807, argued the cause for petitioners in both cases. With him on the briefs was Howard P.
Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. United States
CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL & PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 306. Argued May 2, 1961. Decided June 5, 1961. Raymond K. Merrill argued the cause for appellants in both cases. With him on the briefs for appellant in No. 306
International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. National Labor Relations Board
INTERNATIONAL LADIES’ GARMENT WORKERS’ UNION, AFL-CIO, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD et al. No. 284. Argued April 17, 1961. Decided June 5, 1961. Charles J. Morris and Morris P. Glushien argued the cause for petitioner. With them on the
Williams v. Moore
June 2, 1961. No. 1000. Williams v. Moore, Warden. Thos. H. Dent for petitioner. Will Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, and Riley Eugene Fletcher and Leon F. Pesek, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
Segriff v. Johnston
No. 996, Misc. Segriff, Administrator, v. Johnston. Edward O. Spotts for petitioner. Donald W. Bebenek for respondent.
Stoneking v. United States
No. 968, Misc. Stoneking v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Alexander v. Daugherty
No. 846, Misc. Alexander v. Daugherty, Warden, et al.
Cito v. United States
No. 625, Misc. Cito v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Foley and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Dean v. Ohio
No. 99, Misc. Dean v. Ohio. Petitioner pro se. Earl W. Allison for respondent.
United States v. Klein
No. 907. United States v. Klein et al. Solicitor General Cox, Roger P. Marquis and S. Billingsley Hill for the United States. Frank J. Delaney for respondents. Reported below: _ Ct. Cl. _, _ F. 2d _.
Batistic v. Pilliod
No. 894. Batistic v. Pilliod, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for respondent.
Ginsburg v. Ginsburg
May 29, 1961. No. 551. Ginsburg v. Ginsburg et al.,
Holt v. Oklahoma
HOLT et al. v. OKLAHOMA. No. 821. Decided May 29, 1961.
Herron v. United States
HERRON v. UNITED STATES. No. 791. Decided May 29, 1961. Reported below: _ F. Supp. _. Appellant pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick and Alan S. Rosenthal for the United States.
Lurk v. United States
LURK v. UNITED STATES. No. 669. Argued May 4-5, 1961. Decided May 29, 1961. Eugene Gressman argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Oscar H. Davis argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor Gener
United States v. Neustadt
UNITED STATES v. NEUSTADT et ux. No. 533. Argued May 2, 1961. Decided May 29, 1961. Assistant Attorney General Orrick argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Cox, former Solicitor General Rankin
Sam Fox Publishing Co. v. United States
SAM FOX PUBLISHING CO., INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 56. Argued March 29-30, 1961. Decided May 29, 1961. Charles A. Horsky argúed the cause for appellants. With him on the brief was Alvin Friedman. Daniel M. Friedman argued the
Local 761, International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. National Labor Relations Board
LOCAL 761, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF ELECTRICAL, RADIO & MACHINE WORKERS, AFL-CIO v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD et al. No. 321. Argued April 17-18, 1961. Decided May 29, 1961. Benjamin C. Sigal argued the cause for petitioner. With him on
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.