Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1961 Cases
544 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Reck v. Pate
RECK v. PATE, WARDEN. No. 181. Argued April 19, 1961. Decided June 12, 1961. Donald Page Moore argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Anthony Bradley Eben. William C. Wines, Assistant Attorney General of Illinois, argued
Lott v. United States
LOTT et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 238. •Argued April 18, 1961.— Decided June 12, 1961. C. W. Wellen argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were John H. Crooker and Joe S. Moss. Bruce J. Terris argued the cause for the Unite
Power Reactor Development Co. v. International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers
POWER REACTOR DEVELOPMENT CO. v. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF ELECTRICAL, RADIO AND MACHINE WORKERS, AFL-CIO, et al. No. 315. Argued April 26-27, 1961. Decided June 12, 1961. Solicitor General Cox argued the cause for petitioners in No. 454. With
Communist Party v. Catherwood
COMMUNIST PARTY, U. S. A., et al. v. CATHERWOOD, INDUSTRIAL COMMISSIONER. No. 495. Argued May 4, 1961. Decided June 12, 1961. John J. Abt argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioners. Julius L. Sackman argued the cause for respondent.
United States v. Shimer
UNITED STATES v. SHIMER. No. 392. Argued April 27, 1961. Decided June 12, 1961. Wayne G. Barnett argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were former Solicitor General Rankin, Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney
Gori v. United States
GORI v. UNITED STATES. No. 486. Argued May 3, 1961.— Decided June 12, 1961. Harry I. Rand argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Milton C. Weisman and Jerome Lewis. Beatrice Rosenberg argued the cause for the United Sta
Horton v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
HORTON v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. No. 478. Argued May 3, 1961. Decided June 12, 1961. Joe H. Tonahill and William VanDercreek argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Howell Cobb argued the cause for respondent. With him on t
Civil Aeronautics Board v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.
CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD v. DELTA AIR LINES, INC. No. 492. Argued April 27, 1961. Decided June 12, 1961. John F. Davis argued the cause for petitioner in No. 492. On the briefs were former Solicitor General Rankin, Solicitor General Cox, Ass
Jarecki v. G. D. Searle & Co.
JARECKI, FORMER COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, et al. v. G. D. SEARLE & CO. No. 151. Argued March 21, 1961. Decided June 12, 1961. Wayne G. Barnett argued the cause for petitioners in No. 151 and for respondent in No. 169. With him on the b
California v. Federal Power Commission
No. 599. No. 681. No. 695. No. 505, Misc. California et al. v. Federal Power Commission et al., Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes et al. v. United States et al., Chaifetz v. United States, Hanna v. Home Insurance Co.,
Hatfield v. Buchkoe
No. 1077, Misc. Hatfield v. Buchkoe, Warden.
Reina v. New York
No. 1031, Misc. Reina v. New York. Frances Kahn for petitioner.
Edmonds v. Nash
No. 978, Misc. Edmonds v. Nash, Warden.
Rogers v. United States
No. 927. Rogers et al. v. United States. William R. Bagby for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer, Harry Baum and Joseph Kovner for the United States.
Witt v. United States
No. 942. Witt v. United States. Russell E. Parsons for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Field v. Commissioner
No. 934. Field et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Burton W. Ranter for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and I. Henry Kutz for respondent.
Ledford v. Curran
No. 752, Misc. Ledford v. Curran, U. S. District Judge. Frederick Bernays Wiener for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick and Alan S. Rosenthal for respondent.
Irvin v. Dowd
IRVIN v. DOWD, WARDEN. No. 41. Argued November 9, 1960.— Decided June 6, 1961. James D. Lopp and Theodore Lockyear, Jr. argued the cause for petitioner. With them on the brief was James D. Naje. Richard M. Oivan, Assistant Attorney General
Noto v. United States
NOTO v. UNITED STATES. No. 9. Argued October 10-11, 1960. Decided June 5, 1961. John J. Abt argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Kevin T. Maroney and John F. Davis argued the cause for the United States. With Mr. Maroney on th
Scales v. United States
SCALES v. UNITED STATES. No. 1. Argued April 29, 1959. Reargued October 10, 1960.— Decided June 5, 1961. Telford Taylor reargued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was McNeill Smith. John F. Davis reargued the cause for the Un
Communist Party v. Subversive Activities Control Board
COMMUNIST PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES v. SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES CONTROL BOARD. No. 12. Argued October 11-12, 1960.— Decided June 5, 1961. John J. Abt and Joseph Foret argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin
Moses Lake Homes, Inc. v. Grant County
No. 212. No. 584. No. 715. No. 726. No. 136, Misc. No. 655, Misc. No. 890, Misc. Moses Lake Homes, Inc., et al. v. Grant County, Yale Transport Corp. et al. v. United States et al., Clawson v. United States, Coduto v. United States, Duncan
Smith v. United States
No. 905, Misc. Smith v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Felicia Dubrovsky for the United States.
Orme v. Orme
No. 926. Orme v. Orme et al. Carl L. Shipley and Thomas A. Ziebarth for petitioner. Bernard I. Nordlinger and Ward H. Oehmann for respondents. Reported below: _ U. S. App. D. C. _, _ F. 2d _.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.