Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1961 Cases
544 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Hubbard v. Board of Education
HUBBARD v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF NEW YORK CITY. No. 307, Misc. Decided October 9, 1961.
Shapiro v. Elbar Realty, Inc.
No. 163, Misc. Shapiro v. Elbar Realty, Inc. Appellant pro se. Edward C. Park for appellee.
Antipas v. United States
No. 42, Misc. Antipas v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox for the United States.
Commissioner v. Schlude
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. SCHLUDE et ux. No. 629. Decided June 19, 1961. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General-Rice, Harry Baum and George F. Lynch for petitioner. Robert Ash and Carl F. Bauersfeld for respondents.
Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. Johnson
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO. v. JOHNSON, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 906. Decided June 19, 1961. George D. Gibson and John W. Riely for appellant. Thomas Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Peyton B. Abb
Swift & Co. v. United States
SWIFT & CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 875. Decided June 19, 1961. John T. Chadwell, Richard S. Rhodes, Arthur C. O’Meara, John C. Berghoff, Weymouth Kirkland, E. Houston Harsha, George E. Leonard, Jr., John P. Doyle, Frederick T. Barrett
Denny v. Bush
DENNY et al. v. BUSH et al. No. 868. Decided June 19, 1961. Gerard A. Rault for appellants. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall and Harold H. Greene for the United States, as amicus curiae, urging affirmance.
Trubek v. Ullman
TRUBEK et al. v. ULLMAN, STATE’S ATTORNEY. No. 847. Decided June 19, 1961. Fowler V. Harper for appellants.
Commissioner v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. MILWAUKEE & SUBURBAN TRANSPORT CORP. No. 843. Decided June 19, 1961. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer, Harry Baum and Joseph Kovner for petitioner. Richard R. Teschner and Warr
Broughton v. Ohio
BROUGHTON v. OHIO. No. 554. Decided June 19, 1961. Robert L. Merritt for appellant. Jack G. Day filed a brief for Ohio Civil Liberties Union, as amicus curiae, in support of appellant.
Carolina Amusement Co. v. Martin
CAROLINA AMUSEMENT CO. et al. v. MARTIN, SHERIFF, et al. No. 424. Decided June 19, 1961. J. D. Todd, Jr. and Chester D. Ward, Jr. for appellants.
Bargaintown, U. S. A., Inc. v. Whitman
BARGAINTOWN, U. S. A., INC., et al. v. WHITMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LEBANON COUNTY, PA., et al. No. 76. Decided June 19, 1961. — F. Supp. —, affirmed. David G. Bress and Leonard Braman for appellants. Anne X. Alpern, Attorney General of Pe
Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroy
CAFETERIA & RESTAURANT WORKERS UNION, LOCAL 473, AFL-CIO, et al. v. McELROY et al. No. 97. Argued January 12, 1961.— Decided June 19, 1961. Bernard Dunau argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioners. John F. Davis argued the cause for
Lathrop v. Donohue
LATHROP v. DONOHUE. No. 200. Argued January 18, 1961. Decided June 19, 1961. Trayton L. Lathrop and Leon E. Isaksen argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant. John W. Reynolds, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and Gordon Sinykin argued
International Ass'n of Machinists v. Street
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS et al. v. STREET et al. No. 4. Argued April 21, 1960. Set for reargument June 20, 1960. Reargued January 17-18, 1961. Decided June 19, 1961. Lester P. Schoene and Milton Kramer reargued the cause and
Marcus v. Search Warrant of Property
MARCUS et al. v. SEARCH WARRANT OF PROPERTY AT 104 EAST TENTH STREET, KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI, et al. No. 225. Argued March 30, 1961. Decided June 19, 1961. Sidney M. Glazer argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were Morris A
American Automobile Ass'n v. United States
AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION v. UNITED STATES. No. 288. Argued April 17, 1961. Decided June 19, 1961. Fleming Bomar argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Joseph E. McAndrews. Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer arg
Mapp v. Ohio
MAPP v. OHIO. No. 236. Argued March 29, 1961. Decided June 19, 1961. A. L. Kearns argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Walter L. Greene. Gertrude Bauer Mahon argued the cause for appellee. With her on the brief was John
Culombe v. Connecticut
CULOMBE v. CONNECTICUT. No. 161. Argued January 19, 1961. Decided June 19, 1961. Alexander A. Goldfarb argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. John D. LaBelle argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent. John J. Hunt filed
Piemonte v. United States
PIEMONTE v. UNITED STATES. No. 122. Argued March 21, 1961. Decided June 19, 1961. Melvin B. Lewis argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Theodore George Gilinsky argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs wer
Poe v. Ullman
POE et al. v. ULLMAN, STATE’S ATTORNEY. No. 60. Argued March 1-2, 1961. Decided June 19, 1961 Fowler V. Harper argued the cause and filed a brief for appellants. Raymond J. Cannon, Assistant Attorney General of Connecticut, argued the cause
Torcaso v. Watkins
TORCASO v. WATKINS, CLERK. No. 373. Argued April 24, 1961. Decided June 19, 1961. Leo Pfeffer and Lawrence Speiser argued the cause foi appellant. With them on the briefs were Joseph A. Sickles, Carlton R. Sickles, Bruce N. Goldberg, Rowlan
Baker v. Colorado
No. 1198, Misc. Baker v. Colorado.
Outen v. South Carolina
No. 1207, Misc. Outen v. South Carolina.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.