Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1962 Cases
563 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Trueblood v. Tinsley
No. 1132, Misc. Trueblood v. Tinsley, Warden. Samuel D. Menin for petitioner. J. F. Brauer, Assistant Attorney General of Colorado, for respondent.
Pate v. United States
No. 1128, Misc. Pate v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Broughton v. New York
No. 895, Misc. Broughton v. New York. Petitioner pro se. Frank S. Hogan and Harold Roland Shapiro for respondent.
Foster v. Boles
No. 267, Misc. Foster v. Boles, Warden. Petitioner pro se. C. Donald Robertson, Attorney General of West Virginia, George H. Mitchell and Simon M. Bailey, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
Abbrescia v. United States
No. 716. No. 895. No. 956. Abbrescia v. United States; Doran v. United States; and Grieco v. United States. Julius Lucius Echeles for petitioners in Nos. 716 and 895. Frank W. Oliver for petitioner in No. 956. Solicitor General Cox, Assista
Alamance Industries, Inc. v. Triumph Hosiery Mills, Inc.
No. 954. Alamance Industries, Inc., et al. v. Triumph Hosiery Mills, Inc., et al. Jay H. Topkis for petitioners. Thornton H. Brooks, John W. Malley and Carl G. Love for respondents.
Gulf Power Co. v. Shahid
No. 926. Gulf Power Co. v. Shahid et al. E. Dixie Beggs for petitioner.
Anchor Line, Ltd. v. Federal Maritime Commission
No. 913. Anchor Line, Ltd., et al. v. Federal Maritime Commission et al. Ronald A. Capone, Cletus Keating and Elmer C. Maddy for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Irwin A. Seibel, Robert E. Mitchell a
Parmer v. Illinois
June 18, 1962. No. 1049, Misc. Parmer v. Illinois. Petitioner pro se. William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, for respondent. Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of cases in which orders were this d
Seelig v. United States
SEELIG v. UNITED STATES. No. 841, Misc. Decided June 18, 1962. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Harold H. Greene and Howard A. Glickstein for the United -States.
Milutin v. Bouchard
MILUTIN v. BOUCHARD, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE. No. 782. Decided June 18, 1962. Alfred W. Charles for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox for respondent.
Hall v. Heard
HALL v. HEARD, ACTING CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR. No. 1269, Misc. Decided June 18, 1962.
Valenzuela v. Eyman
VALENZUELA v. EYMAN, WARDEN, et al. No. 1144, Misc. Decided June 18, 1962.
Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Reily
KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. v. REILY, COLLECTOR OF REVENUE OF LOUISIANA. No. 918. Decided June 18, 1962. W. Scott Wilkinson, Milton W. Schober and Pike Hall, Jr. for appellant. Emmett E. Batson for appellee.
Grumman v. United States
GRUMMAN v. UNITED STATES. No. 436. Argued April 19, 1962. Decided June 18, 1962. David Rein argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Joseph Forer. Bruce J. Terris argued the cause for the United States. With him on the br
Rudolph v. United States
RUDOLPH et ux. v. UNITED STATES. No. 396. Argued April 3, 1962. Decided June 18, 1962. Richard A. Freling argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs was Felix Atwood. John B. Jones, Jr. argued the cause for the United States.
Drake Bakeries Inc. v. Local 50, American Bakery & Confectionery Workers International
DRAKE BAKERIES INCORPORATED v. LOCAL 50, AMERICAN BAKERY & CONFECTIONERY WORKERS INTERNATIONAL, AFL-CIO, et al. No. 598. Argued April 18, 1962. Decided June 18, 1962. Robert Abelow argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs wer
Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co.
ATKINSON et al. v. SINCLAIR REFINING CO. No. 430. Argued April 18, 1962. Decided June 18, 1962. Gilbert A. Cornfield argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Gilbert Feldman and William E. Rentfro. George B. Christensen
In re McConnell
IN RE McCONNELL. No. 498. Argued April 10, 1962. Decided June 18, 1962. Thomas C. McConnell, petitioner, argued the cause and filed briefs pro se. Philip R. Monahan argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicito
Sinclair Refining Co. v. Atkinson
SINCLAIR REFINING CO. v. ATKINSON et al. No. 434. Argued April 18, 1962. Decided June 18, 1962. George B. Christensen argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Fred H. Daugherty and Richard W. Austin. Gilbert A. Cornfield
Freeman v. Armour & Co.
No. 952. Freeman, Secretary of Agriculture, et al. v. Armour & Co. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, John G. Laughlin, Jr. and Sherman L. Cohn for petitioners. Herbert Brownell, Thomas F. Daly, Harry A. Inman and Geo
Philamon Laboratories, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
No. 909. Philamon Laboratories, Inc., v. National Labor Relations Board. Sanford H. Markham for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Stuart Rothman, Dominick L. Maholi and Norton J. Come for respondent.
Hecla Mining Co. v. United States
No. 902. Hecla Mining Co. v. United States. Valentine Brookes and Paul E. Anderson for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer, Lee A. Jackson and Harry Marselli for the United States.
Winckler & Smith Citrus Products Co. v. Sunkist Growers, Inc.
No. 275. Winckler & Smith Citrus Products Co. et al. v. Sunkist Growers, Inc., et al. William, C. Dixon and Holmes Bald-ridge for petitioners. Ross C. Fisher and Herman F. Selvin for respondents.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.