Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1962 Cases
563 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Adkins v. United States
No. 1222, Misc. Adkins v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Richard W. Schmude for the United States.
Young v. United States
No. 1209, Misc. Young v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Sidney M. Glazer for the United States.
Mitchell v. United States
No. 1202, Misc. Mitchell v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
Johnson v. Zimmer
No. 1187, Misc. Johnson v. Zimmer et al.
Spady v. Rhay
No. 1173, Misc. Spady v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent.
Griffin v. United States
No. 1162, Misc. Griffin v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Richard W. Schmude for the United States.
Wright v. Rhay
No. 1149, Misc. Wright v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent, et al.
Owens v. Illinois
No. 1032, Misc. Owens v. Illinois. Petitioner pro se. William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, for respondent.
Morrison v. Illinois
No. 986, Misc. Morrison v. Illinois. Petitioner pro se. William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, for respondent.
Caldwell v. Wilkins
No. 738, Misc. Caldwell v. Wilkins, Warden.
Soblen v. United States
No. 957. Soblen v. United States. Ephraim London and Leonard B. Boudin for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Yeag-ley and Kevin T. Maroney for the United States. William E. Haudek for Dr. Bernard Diamond et al. N
N. V. Handelsbureau La Mola v. Kennedy
No. 907. N. V. Handelsbureau La Mola v. Kennedy, Attorney General. Lawrence S. Lesser and Dinsmore Adams for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, John G. Laughlin, Jr. and Pauline B. Heller for respondent.
Jack Daniel Distillery v. Hoffman Distilling Co.
No. 950. Jack Daniel Distillery, Lem Motlow, Prop., Inc., v. Hoffman Distilling Co. et al. John J. Hooker, Joe - E. Daniels and Chauncey P. Carter for petitioner. Charles B. Cannon, John K. Skaggs, Jr. and James E. Fahey for respondents.
Slavitt v. United States
No. 943. Slavitt v. United States. Charlotte Slavitt pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick and John G. Laughlin, Jr. for the United States. Reported below: -Ct. Cl.-.
Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc. v. Richardson
No. 722. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc., v. Richardson, Executrix, et al. Eugene Underwood for petitioner. Henry N. Longley, Benjamin H. Siff, Bernard Rolnick and Louis R. Harolds for respondents.
Delano-Earlimart Irrigation District v. Rank
No. 966. Delano-Earlimart Irrigation District et al. v. Rank et al. Denver C. Peckinpah, Adolph Moskovitz, James K. Abercrombie, Irl Davis Brett and J. 0. Reavis for petitioners. John H. Lauten and Claude L. Rowe for respondents.
Griffin v. Maryland
No. 287. Griffin et al. v. Maryland. Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., John Silard, Thurgood Marshall, Jack Green-berg and James M. Nabrit III for petitioners. Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General of Maryland, and Clayton A. Dietrich, Assistant Attorney Ge
Willner v. Committee on Character & Fitness, Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department
No. 995. Willner v. Committee on Character and Fitness, Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department. Henry Wald-man for petitioner. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, F
Koaches v. Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County
No. 997, No. 1283, No. 1296, No. 1376, No. 1444, Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Koaches v. Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania; Watts v. Castle, Circuit Judge; Watson v. Hooper, Judge; Webb v. Compton, Chief Justice of th
Gideon v. Cochran
No. 1011. Gideon v. Cochran, Corrections Director.
Yellin v. United States
No. 477. Yellin v. United States. Argued April 18-19, 1962. Victor Ra-binowitz argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Leonard B. Boudin. Bruce J. Terris argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs wer
Arizona v. California
No. 8, Original. Arizona v. California et al. [For earlier orders herein, see 344 U. S. 806, 919; 345 U. S. 914, 968; 347 U. S. 985, 986; 348 U. S. 947; 350 U. S. 114, 812, 880, 955; 351 U. S. 977; 354 U. S. 918; 357 U. S. 902; 364 U. S. 94
Whitus v. Balkcom
WHITUS v. BALKCOM, WARDEN. No. 1357, Misc. Decided June 25, 1962. Petitioner pro se. Eugene Cook, Attorney General of Georgia, and Howard P. Wallace, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Gilliam v. United States
GILLIAM v. UNITED STATES. No. 1274, Misc. Decided June 25, 1962. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox for the United States.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.