Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1962 Cases
563 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Torrance v. Callenius
TORRANCE v. CALLENIUS et al., MEMBERS OF THE IOWA BOARD OF CONTROL, et al. No. 227, Misc. Decided May 14, 1962.
Best v. City of Toledo
BEST v. CITY OF TOLEDO. No. 1048, Misc. Decided May 14, 1962. James W. Cowell for appellant. Louis R. Young and Lewis W. Combest for appellee.
Mattox v. Sacks
MATTOX v. SACKS, WARDEN. No. 584, Misc. Decided May 14, 1962. Petitioner pro se. Mark McElroy, Attorney General of Ohio, and Aubrey A. Wendt, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
United States v. Diebold, Inc.
UNITED STATES v. DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED. No. 286. Argued April 23, 1962. Decided May 14, 1962. Daniel M. Friedman argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger
Malone v. Bowdoin
MALONE v. BOWDOIN et al. No. 113. Argued March 20, 1962. Decided May 14, 1962. Daniel M. Friedman argued the cause for petitioner. On the briefs were Solicitor General Cox and Roger P. Marquis. William Buford Mitchell argued the cause for r
Hutcheson v. United States
HUTCHESON v. UNITED STATES. No. 46. Argued November 6, 1961. Decided May 14, 1962. Frederick Bernays Wiener argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Charles H. Tuttle and Joseph P. Tumulty, Jr. Solicitor General Cox argu
Goldblatt v. Town of Hempstead
GOLDBLATT et al. v. TOWN OF HEMPSTEAD. No. 78. Argued January 15-16, 1962. Decided May 14, 1962. Milton I. Newman argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were John J. Bennett and Edward M. Miller. William C. Mattison argued
Beck v. Washington
BECK v. WASHINGTON. No. 40. Argued November 14, 1961. Decided May 14, 1962. Charles S. Burdell argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner. Donald McL. Davidson entered an appearance for petitioner. James E. Kennedy argued the cause fo
Vaughan v. Atkinson
VAUGHAN v. ATKINSON et al. No. 323. Argued March 22, 1962. Decided May 14, 1962. Jacob L. Morewitz argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Walter B. Martin, Jr. argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Barron F
Perry v. Illinois
No. 1064, Misc. Perry v. Illinois.
Hayes v. United States
No. 834, Misc. Hayes v. United States. Stanley M. Rosenblum for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Jerome M. Feit for the United States.
Cox v. Ellis
No. 92, Misc. Cox v. Ellis, Corrections Director. Petitioner pro se. Will Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, and Sam B. Wilson, Leon F. Pesek and Charles Lind, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
Miles Laboratories, Inc. v. Frolich
No. 812. Miles Laboratories, Inc., v. Frolich, doing business as Encino Chemicals. William T. Woodson, Beverly W. Patti-shall and Reginald E. Caughey for petitioner. Respondent pro se.
Adams v. Federal Trade Commission
No. 741. Adams et al. v. Federal Trade Commission. James C. Wilson for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Richard A. Solomon, James Mcl. Henderson and Alvin L. Berman for respondent.
Simpson v. United States
SIMPSON, doing business as MID-SEVEN TRANSPORTATION CO., v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 748. Decided April 30, 1962. D. C. Nolan for appellant. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane a
Friedberg v. Silberglitt
FRIEDBERG v. SILBERGLITT, WARDEN. No. 777. Decided April 30, 1962. Gilbert S. Rosenthal for appellant. Frank S. Hogan and H. Richard Uviller for appellee.
Carnley v. Cochran
CARNLEY v. COCHRAN, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR. No. 158. Argued February 20-21, 1962. Decided April 30, 1962. By appointment of the Court, 368 U. S. 806, Harold A. Ward III argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner. James O. Mahorner, Assi
Commissioner v. Bilder
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. BILDER, EXECUTRIX. No. 384. Argued March 29, 1962. Decided April 30, 1962. Stephen J. Poliak argued the cause for petitioner. On the briefs were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorje
California v. Federal Power Commission
CALIFORNIA v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION et al. No. 187. Argued March 1, 1962. Decided April 30, 1962. William, M. Bennett argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox argued the cause for the Federal Power Commissi
Dairy Queen, Inc. v. Wood
DAIRY QUEEN, INC., v. WOOD, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE, et al. No. 244. Argued February 19-20, 1962. Decided April 30, 1962. Michael H. Egnal argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Wallace D. Newcomb. Owen J. Ooms argued the
Goldlawr, Inc. v. Heiman
GOLDLAWR, INC., v. HEIMAN et al. No. 101. Argued March 19, 1962. Decided April 30, 1962. Edwin P. Rome argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner. C. Russell Phillips argued the cause for Select Operating Corp. et al., respondents. Wi
Coppedge v. United States
COPPEDGE v. UNITED STATES. No. 157. Argued December 12, 1961. Decided April 30, 1962. Bennett Boskey argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Carl W. Belcher argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor Gene
Drake v. United States
No. 1056, Misc. Drake v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
Daniels v. Missouri
No. 632, Misc. Daniels v. Missouri.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.