US Case Law Library

Find court opinions that match your case.

Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.

313,007+
Court Opinions
266
1754–2019 Span
265
Courts Represented
7,507+
Attorneys with Cases

Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions

The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.

1962 Cases

563 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.

Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Outcome n/a Employment Law 1962

Badamo v. New Jersey

No. 975, Misc. Badamo v. New Jersey.

369 U.S. 846 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Outcome n/a 1962

Woodbury v. New York

No. 583, Misc. Woodbury v. New York. Petitioner pro se. Manuel W. Levine for respondent.

369 U.S. 845 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Outcome n/a 1962

Order of Railway Conductors & Brakemen v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad

No. 745. Order of Railway Conductors and Brakemen et al. v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Co. Burke Williamson, Jack A. Williamson and Harry Wilmarth for petitioners. James P. Reedy for respondent.

369 U.S. 844 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Outcome n/a 1962

Shotwell Manufacturing Co. v. United States

April 9, 1962. No. 142. Shotwell Manufacturing Co. et al. v. United States. George T. Christensen and William T. Kirby for petitioners.

369 U.S. 843 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Remanded 1962

Kerr Steamship Co. v. United States

KERR STEAMSHIP CO., INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 29. Decided April 9, 1962. Herman Goldman, Elkan Turk and Elkan Turk, Jr. for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox and Robert E. Mitchell for respondents.

369 U.S. 422 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Outcome n/a Employment Law 1962

National Labor Relations Board v. Walton Manufacturing Co.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. WALTON MANUFACTURING CO. et al. No. 77. Argued March 19, 1962. Decided April 9, 1962. Norton J. Come argued the cause for petitioner in both cases. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Cox, Stuart

369 U.S. 404 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Vacated 1962

Crawford v. Circuit Court of Kalamazoo

No. 581, Misc. Crawford v. Circuit Court of Kalamazoo et al.

369 U.S. 842 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Outcome n/a 1962

Stinson v. United States

No. 943, Misc. Stinson v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.

369 U.S. 841 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Outcome n/a 1962

Washington v. Heinze

No. 671, Misc. Washington v. Heinze, Warden. Petitioner pro se. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

369 U.S. 840 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Outcome n/a Civil Rights 1962

Washington State Board Against Discrimination v. O'Meara

No. 727. No. 730. Washington State Board Against Discrimination et al. v. O'Meara et al.; and Jones et al. v. O’Meara et al. The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted, the judgment vacate

369 U.S. 839 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Outcome n/a 1962

Torres v. California

No. 725. Torres v. California. Russell E. Parsons for petitioner.

369 U.S. 838 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Outcome n/a 1962

Wolf v. Weinstein

No. 739. Wolf et al. v. Weinstein et al. Melvin Lloyd Robbins for petitioners. Harold Harper, Arnold A. Weinstein, Alex L. Rosen and Marvin N. Rosen for respondents.

369 U.S. 837 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Outcome n/a 1962

Presser v. United States

No. 278. Presser v. United States. Argued March 22, 26, 1962. John C. Cardinal argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Edwin Knachel and Robert E. Freed. Richard J. Medalie argued the cause for the United States. On the

369 U.S. 836 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Outcome n/a 1962

United States v. Gilmore

No. 255. United States v. Gilmore et al. Argued March 27-28, 1962. Wayne G. Barnett argued the cause for the United States. On the briefs were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer, Richard J. Medalie, Melva M. Graney

369 U.S. 835 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Outcome n/a 1962

Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Committee

No. 70. Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Committee. Argued December 5,1961. Robert L. Carter argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Frank D. Reeves. Mark R. Hawes argued the cause for respondent. With him on t

369 U.S. 834 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Outcome n/a 1962

National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Gray

No. 44. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Gray, Attorney General of Virginia, et al. Argued November 8, 1961. Robert L. Carter argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Oliver W. Hill, Herbert

369 U.S. 833 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Remanded 1962

Greene v. United States

GREENE et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 687. Decided April 2, 1962. Richard E. Moot for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Joseph M. Howard for the United States.

369 U.S. 403 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Remanded 1962

Murphy v. United States

MURPHY et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 317. Decided April 2, 1962. Albert A. Fiok for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

369 U.S. 402 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Remanded 1962

Grant v. United States

GRANT et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 297. Decided April 2, 1962. Joseph W. Burns for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorjer and Joseph Kovner for the United States.

369 U.S. 401 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Outcome n/a 1962

In re Zipkin

IN RE ZIPKIN. No. 288. Argued March 28-29, 1962. Decided April 2, 1962. Reported below: - S. W. 2d -. Heywood H. Davis argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was William J. Burrell. Richmond C. Coburn argued the cause for re

369 U.S. 400 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Outcome n/a 1962

Rusk v. Cort

RUSK, SECRETARY OF STATE, v. CORT. No. 20. Argued October 11, 1961. Decided April 2, 1962. Oscar H. Davis argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenbe

369 U.S. 367 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Outcome n/a 1962

Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Ellerman Lines, Ltd.

ATLANTIC & GULF STEVEDORES, INC., v. ELLERMAN LINES, LTD., et al. No. 282. Argued February 20, 1962. Decided April 2, 1962. Francis E. Marshall argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was James J. Davis, Jr. Thomas E. Byrne,

369 U.S. 355 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Outcome n/a Estate Planning & Probate 1962

Gullo v. Gullo

No. 647. No. 212, Misc. No. 574, Misc. No. 659, Misc. No. 699, Misc. No. 819, Misc. No. 835, Misc. Gullo v. Gullo, Clinton v. United States, Banks v. United States, Sliva v. Pennsylvania et al., Scott v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

369 U.S. 832 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Outcome n/a 1962

Wolfe v. United States

No. 836, Misc. Wolfe v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.

369 U.S. 831 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Need an attorney for a case like these?

Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.