Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1962 Cases
563 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Lassiter v. United States
LASSITER et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 116. Decided October 8, 1962. Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, George Ponder and William P. Schuler, Assistant Attorneys General, and Albín P. Lassiter for appellants. Solicit
Georgia v. United States
GEORGIA et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 114. Decided October 8, 1962. Eugene Cook, Attorney General of Georgia, and Paul Rodgers, Assistant Attorney General, for appellants. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Har
Readey v. St. Louis County Water Co.
READEY et al. v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY WATER CO. et al. No. 105. Decided October 8, 1962. J. L. London for appellants. Richard E. Crowe, Dan D. Weiner and William J. Becker for appellees.
Harris v. Florida Real Estate Commission
HARRIS v. FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION et al. No. 100. Decided October 8, 1962. M. H. Rosenhouse for appellant. Benjamin T. Shuman for appellees.
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. United States
ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 247. Decided October 8, 1962. Albert B. Russ, Jr., C. Baxter Jones, Herman Heyman, W. L. Grubbs, Prime F. Osborn and Homer S. Carpenter for appellants. Solicitor General Co
Fairview Public Utility District No. One v. City of Anchorage
FAIRVIEW PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NUMBER ONE et al. v. CITY OF ANCHORAGE. No. 223. Decided October 8, 1962. George E. C. Hayes for appellants. Charles S. Rhyne for appellee.
Cannata v. City of New York
CANNATA et al. v. CITY OF NEW YORK. No. 163. Decided October 8, 1962. Raphael H. Weissman for appellants. Leo A. Larkin and Pauline K. Berger for appellee.
Ragan v. City of Seattle
RAGAN v. CITY OF SEATTLE et al. No. 121. Decided October 8, 1962. Francis Hoague for appellant. A. C. Van Soelen for City of Seattle, appellee. J. Duane Vance and William S. Howard, Jr. for Washington Music Merchants, Inc., intervening appe
Bel Oil Corp. v. Cocreham
BEL OIL CORP. v. COCREHAM, COLLECTOR OF REVENUE OF LOUISIANA. No. 123. Decided October 8, 1962. Howard B. Gist for appellant. Chapman L. Sanford for appellee.
Honeywood v. Rockefeller
HONEYWOOD et al. v. ROCKEFELLER, GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK, et al. No. 177. Decided October 8, 1962. Moses M. Falk for appellants. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, Irving G
Holmes v. Mississippi Shipping Co.
No. 268, Misc. Holmes v. Mississippi Shipping Co., Inc. August 23, 1962. Samuel C. Oainsburgh and Raymond H. Kierr for petitioner.
Lentz v. United States
No. 66, Misc. Lentz v. United States. July 24, 1962. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox for the United States.
Thomas v. Patterson
No. 109. Thomas et ux. v. Patterson, District Director of Internal Revenue,
Morgan v. California
No. 1252, Mise. Morgan v. California. William A. Carver for petitioner.
Titmus v. Tinsley
No. 880, Mise. Titmus v. Tinsley, Warden. Petitioner pro se. Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, and J. F. Brauer, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
In re Snebold
No. 1431, Mise. In re Snebold.
Blocker v. California
No. 1353, Mise. Blocker v. California et al.
Case v. North Carolina
No. 1333, Mise. Case v. North Carolina. Petitioner pro se. T. W. Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Harry W. McGalliard, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Williams v. New York
No. 1318, Mise. Williams v. New York.
Krawitz v. McShane
No. 1302, Mise. Krawitz v. McShane, U. S. Marshal, et al. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick and Alan S. Rosenthal for respondents.
Cedillo v. Texas
No. 1285, Mise. Cedillo v. Texas.
Koptik v. United States
No. 1267, Mise. Koptik v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Theodore George Gilinsky for the United
Graves v. Maryland
No. 1251, Mise. Graves v. Maryland. Emmett McKenzie.for petitioner.
Huffman v. United States
No. 1233, Mise. Huffman v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.