Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1963 Cases
685 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Bogan v. New York
No. 677, Misc. Bogan v. New York.
Latham v. Crouse
No. 666, Misc. Latham et al. v. Crouse, Warden. Lawrence Speiser and Bernard Roazen for petitioners. William M. Ferguson, Attorney General of Kansas, and J. Richard Foth and Park McGee, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
Mahi v. Heinze
No. 466, Misc. Mahi v. Heinze, Warden. Petitioner pro se. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, and Edsel W. Haws, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
Arnebergh v. Zeitlin
No. 584. Arnebergh v. Zeitlin et al. Roger Arnebergh, pro se, Philip E. Grey and Wm. E. Doran for petitioner. Charles H. Keating, Jr. for Citizens for Decent Literature, Inc., et al.
Roy v. Minnesota
No. 542. Roy v. Minnesota.
Ng Kam Fook v. Esperdy
No. 483. Ng Kam Fook et al. v. Esperdy, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service. Abraham Lebenkoff for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox for respondent.
G. L. Christian & Associates v. United States
No. 538. G. L. Christian & Associates v. United States. Gilbert A. Cuneo, Norman R. Crozier, Jr., Chester H. Johnson, William L. Hillyer, Wilson Johnston, Eldon H. Crowell and Ashley Sellers for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant
Ivey v. United States
No. 533. Ivey et al. v. United States. Eugene H. Phillips for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Richard W. Schmude for the United States.
Committee Appointed by the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County v. Battelle Memorial Institute
No. 505. Committee Appointed by the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County, Ohio, v. Battelle Memorial Institute. Albert R. Teare for petitioner. Francis J. Wright and Harry Wright III for respondent.
Artell v. Texas
No. 284. Artell v. Texas. Clyde W. Woody for petitioner. Carl E. F. Dally for respondent.
Willner v. Committee on Character & Fitness
December 16, 1963. No. 140, October Term, 1962. Willner v. Committee on Character and Fitness, Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, Henry Waldman on the motion.
McAllister v. Louisiana
McALLISTER v. LOUISIANA. No. 721, Misc. Decided December 16, 1963. Ernest A. Carrere, Jr. for appellant.
Smith v. California
SMITH v. CALIFORNIA. No. 72. Decided December 16, 1963. Stanley Fleishman and Sam Rosenwein for petitioner. Roger Amebergh, Philip E. Grey and Wm. E. Doran for respondent. Briefs of amici curiae, urging reversal, were filed by Edward de Gra
Fair Drain Taxation, Inc. v. City of St. Clair Shores
FAIR DRAIN TAXATION, INC., et al. v. CITY OF ST. CLAIR SHORES et al. No. 604. Decided December 16, 1963. Wilson M. Jackson, William L. Sanders and Raymond M. Jacobson for appellants. John H. Yoe and Charles R. Moon for appellees.
Eichel v. New York Central Railroad
EICHEL v. NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. No. 480. Decided December 16, 1963. Arnold B. Elkind and Richard C. Machcinski for petitioner. Gerald E. Dwyer for respondent.
Fields v. City of Fairfield
FIELDS et al. v. CITY OF FAIRFIELD. No. 30. Argued December 10-11, 1963. —Decided December 16, 1963. Melvin L. Wulf argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were Charles Morgan, Jr. and Richard J. Medalie. Frank B. Parsons arg
Meyer v. United States
MEYER v. UNITED STATES. No. 61. Argued October 24, 1963. Decided December 16, 1963. Samuel W. Sherman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Martin A. Oettinger. Joseph Kovner argued the cause for the United States. With
Foti v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
FOTI v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE. No. 28. Argued October 17, 21, 1963. —Decided December 16, 1963. James J. Catty argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Philip R. Monahan argued the cause for respondent. With him o
Tinsley v. Ohio
No. 486, Misc. Tinsley v. Ohio. Petitioner pro se. John T. Corrigan for respondent.
Wanamaker v. New Jersey
No. 627, Misc. Wanamaker v. New Jersey.
Chapman v. Beto
No. 358, Misc. Chapman v. Beto, Corrections Director, et al. Petitioner pro se. Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, and Howard Fender, Gilbert J. Pena and Alio B. Crow, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for respondents.
Caputo v. Salzhandler
No. 282. Caputo et al. v. Salzhandler. Herbert S. Thatcher and George Pollack for petitioners. Burton H. Hall for respondent.
Most Worshipful Universal Grand Lodge v. Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge
No. 514. Most Worshipful Universal Grand Lodge, A. F. & A. M., of Washington, et al. v. Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Washington and its Jurisdiction, F. & A. M., et al. Lary Regal for petitioners.
Shavin v. United States
No. 493. Shavin v. United States. Eugene Gressman, William T. Kirby and Anna R. Lavin for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer, Joseph M. Howard and Burton Berkley for the United States.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.