Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1963 Cases
685 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
National Bank of Washington v. McGettigan
No. 487. National Bank of Washington et al. v. McGettigan et al. Paul R. Connolly for petitioners. Harry W. Goldberg and Morris Altman for respondents.
Lamonge v. Ohio
No. 474. Lamonge v. Ohio. John R. Spain for petitioner. Lynn B. Griffith, Jr. and David F. McLain for respondent.
DeGillio v. Michigan
No. 263. DeGillio et al. v. Michigan. Albert A. Goldfarb for petitioners. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of Michigan, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and Donald T. Kane, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
United States v. Vermont
No. 509. United States v. Vermont et al. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorjer, Daniel M. Friedman and Joseph Kovner for the United States. Charles E. Gibson, Jr., Attorney General of Vermont, for respondents.
Hudson Distributors, Inc. v. Eli Lilly & Co.
No. 490. Hudson Distributors, Inc., v. Eli Lilly & Co. Myron N. Krotinger and Morton L. Stone for appellant. Louis S. Peirce for appellee.
Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor
No. 138. Murphy et al. v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor. William P. Sirignano on the motion. Harold Krieger for petitioners, in opposition.
Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Virginia ex rel. Virginia State Bar
December 9, 1963. No. 34. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Virginia ex rel. Virginia State Bar. Wayland B. Cedarquist on the motion.
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes v. United States
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 510. Decided December 9, 1963. Clarence M. Mulholland, Richard R. Lyman, Edward J. Hickey, Jr., William O. Mahoney and Harry A. Carson for appellants in No. 510.
Frank Adams & Co. v. United States
FRANK ADAMS & CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 506. Decided December 9, 1963. Howard Gould for appellants. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Or-rick, Robert B. Hummel, Irwin A. Seibel, Robert W. Ginnane and H. Neil Gar
Kaye v. Spence Chapin Adoption Home
KAYE v. SPENCE CHAPIN ADOPTION HOME. No. 478. Decided December 9, 1963. Appellant pro se. Richard Jones for appellee.
Dennis v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad
DENNIS v. DENVER & RIO GRANDE WESTERN RAILROAD CO. No. 25. Argued November 19, 1963. —Decided December 9, 1963. Wayne L. Black argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Calvin W. Raiolings, Harold E. Wallace, Brigham E. Ro
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. CAPITAL GAINS RESEARCH BUREAU, INC., et al. No. 42. Argued October 21, 1963. Decided December 9, 1963. David Ferber argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Cox, Dan
Corey v. United States
COREY v. UNITED STATES. No. 31. Argued October 17, 1963. —Decided December 9, 1963. Russell Morton Brown argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Maurice C. Goodpasture. Louis F. Claiborne argued the cause for the United S
United States v. Behrens
UNITED STATES v. BEHRENS. No. 86. Argued October 17, 1963. Decided December 9, 1963. Louis F. Claiborne argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Ralph S. Spritzer, B
Williams v. City of Wichita
No. 132. No. 162. No. 200. No. 216. No. 234. No. 261. No. 90, No. 131, No. 188, No. 236, No. 257, No. 282, No. 310, No. 480, Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Williams v. City of Wichita, Averitt et al. v. Mississippi, Tipton
Thom v. Eyman
No. 662, Misc. Thom v. Eyman, Warden.
Studemeyer v. Macy
No. 621, Misc. Studemeyer v. Macy, Chairman, U. S. Civil Service Commission, et al. Claude L. Dawson for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Douglas and Sherman L. Cohn for respondents.
Stello v. United States
No. 465, Misc. Stello v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
Levine v. Lacy
No. 435. Levine v. Lacy. John A. Beck and A. Andrew Giangreco for petitioner. Marshall A. Martin, Jr. and J. Frederick Larrick for respondent.
Texas v. Ashley
No. 458. Texas v. Ashley et al. Carl E. F. Dally for petitioner.
Shell Co. (Puerto Rico), Ltd. v. Secretary of the Treasury of Puerto Rico
No. 445. Shell Co. (Puerto Rico), Ltd., v. Secretary of the Treasury of Puerto Rico. Fernando Ruis-Suria for petitioner. J. B. Fernandez Badillo, Solicitor General of Puerto Rico, and Americo Berra, Assistant Solicitor General, for responde
Clay v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd.
No. 470. Clay v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd. Paschal C. Reese for petitioner. Bert Cotton and Hortense Mound for respondent.
Texas v. New Jersey
No. 13, Original. Texas v. New Jersey et al. [For earlier orders herein, see 369 U. S. 869; 370 U. S. 929; 371 U. S. 873; 372 U. S. 926, 973.]
United States v. California
December 2, 1963. No. 5, Original. United States v. California. Solicitor General Cox and George S. Swarth for the United States. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Charles E. Corker and Howard S. Goldin, Assistant Attorneys Gene
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.