Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1963 Cases
685 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino
No. 403. Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, Receiver, et al. James A. Dixon on the motion.
Parker v. United States
PARKER v. UNITED STATES. No. 516. Decided April 1, 1963. Francis Heisler for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Ralph S. Spritzer, Beatrice Rosenberg and Richard W. Schmude for the United States.
Harshman v. United States
HARSHMAN v. UNITED STATES. No. 515. Decided April 1, 1963. Francis Heisler for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Ralph S. Spritzer, Beatrice Rosenberg and Richard W. Schmude for the United States.
State Tax Commission v. Pacific States Cast Iron Pipe Co.
STATE TAX COMMISSION OF UTAH v. PACIFIC STATES CAST IRON PIPE CO. No. 178. Argued March 20, 1963. Decided April 1, 1963. F. Burton Howard, Assistant Attorney General of Utah, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was A. Pra
Weyerhaeuser Steamship Co. v. United States
WEYERHAEUSER STEAMSHIP CO. v. UNITED STATES. No. 65. Argued February 18, 1963. Decided April 1, 1963. Henry R. Rolph argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Chalmers G. Graham. Anthony L. Mondello argued the cause for th
Castle v. United States
No. 714, Misc. Castle v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Richard W. Schmude for the United States.
Rosoto v. California
No. 749, Misc. Rosoto et al. v. California. A. L. Wirin and Fred Okrand for petitioners. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Gordon Ringer, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
Baker v. United States
No. 843. Baker v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Borden Co. v. Liddy
No. 804. Borden Company v. Liddy, Secretary of Agriculture of Iowa. Maxwell A. O’Brien for petitioner.
Retail Clerks International Ass'n, Local 1625 v. Schermerhorn
No. 368. Retail Clerks International Association, Local 1625, AFL-CIO, et al. v. Schermerhorn et al. Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion. William, B. Barton and Harry J. Lambeth on the motion.
Tar Asphalt Trucking Co. v. United States
TAR ASPHALT TRUCKING CO., INC., v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 762. Decided March 25, 1963. John J. Corcoran, Jr. for appellant. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel, Elliott H. Moyer and Robert W. Ginn
Michigan National Bank v. Robertson
MICHIGAN NATIONAL BANK v. ROBERTSON et ux. No. 55. Decided March 25, 1963. Thomas M. Davies and Robert A. Barlow for petitioner in both cases. Robert A. Nelson and J. Max Harding for respondents in No. 64. Together with No. 64, Michigan Nat
Bush v. Texas
BUSH v. TEXAS. No. 511. Argued February 26, 1963. Decided March 25, 1963. Charles Alan Wright argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Billy J. Moore. Bruce Allen and Alio B. Crow, Jr., Assistant Attorney-General of Texas
Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Committee
GIBSON v. FLORIDA LEGISLATIVE INVESTIGATION COMMITTEE. No. 6. Argued December 5, 1961. Restored to the calendar for reargument April 2, 1962. Reargued October 10-11, 1962. Decided March 25, 1963. Robert L. Carter reargued the cause for peti
Lynumn v. Illinois
LYNUMN v. ILLINOIS. No. 9. Argued February 19, 1963. Decided March 25, 1963. Jewel Lafontant argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. William C. Wines, Assistant Attorney General of Illinois, argued the cause for respondent. With
Laudate v. Massachusetts
March 21, 1963. No. 760. Laudate v. Massachusetts. Paul T. Smith for petitioner. Ediuard W. Brooke, Attorney General of Massachusetts, for respondent.
Loucks v. Randolph
No. 881, Misc. Loucks v. Randolph, Warden.
Burris v. Texas
No. 866, Misc. Burris v. Texas.
DeLucia v. Yeager
No. 831, Misc. DeLucia v. Yeager, Warden.
Underwood v. New Jersey
No. 808, Misc. Underwood v. New Jersey.
Williams v. United States
No. 734, Misc. Williams v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Felicia Dubrovsky for the United States.
Flight Engineers' International Ass'n, EAL Chapter v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.
No. 776. Flight Engineers’ International Association, EAL Chapter, AFL-CIO, v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc. I. J. Gromfine and Herman Stern-stein for petitioner. Burton A. Zorn, Marvin E. Frankel, William Roth and W. Glen Harlan for respondent.
United States v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.
No. 862. United States v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc., et al. Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Douglas and Alan S. Rosenthal for the United States. J. Franklin Fort, Frank B. Ober and T. S. L. Perlman for respondents
Amalgamated Lithographers of America v. National Labor Relations Board
No. 794. Amalgamated Lithographers of America (Ind.) et al. v. National Labor Relations Board et al. Carl Slater for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Stuart Rothman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for the National Labor Relations
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.