Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1963 Cases
685 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Allied Paint & Color Works, Inc. v. United States
No. 63. Allied Paint & Color Works, Inc., v. United States. Robert D. Witte and Daniel H. Greenberg for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox for the United States.
Rugendorf v. United States
No. 223. Rugendorf v. United States. Melvin B. Lewis and Julius Lucius Echeles for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Jerome M. Feit for the United States.
Rabinowitz v. Kennedy
No. 287. Rabinowitz et al. v. Kennedy, Attorney General. David Rein for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Yeagley and George B. Searls for respondent.
National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama ex rel. Flowers
No. 169. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama ex rel. Flowers, Attorney General. Robert L. Carter, Fred D. Gray and Arthur D. Shores for petitioner. Richmond M. Flowers, Attorney General of Alabama, and Gord
Ungar v. Sarafite
No. 167. Ungar v. Sarafite, Judge. Emanuel Red field for appellant. Frank S. Hogan and H. Richard Uviller for appellee.
Cauer v. Justices of the United States Court of Customs & Patent Appeals
No. 268, Misc. Cauer et al. v. Justices of the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. Robert H. Riñes and Nelson H. Shapiro for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Douglas and Alan S. Rosenthal for res
Mantzouranis v. Heinze
No. 9, Misc. Mantzouranis v. Heinze, Warden. Petitioner pro se. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Fallen v. United States
No. 210. Fallen v. United States.
Smith v. California
No. 72. Smith v. California. Stanley Fleishman for petitioner. Roger Arnebergh, Philip E. Grey and Wm. E. Doran for respondent.
Foti v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
No. 28. Foti v. Immigration and Naturalization Service. Jack Wasserman and David Carliner on the motions.
Louisiana v. Mississippi
No. 14, Original. Louisiana v. Mississippi et al. Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, Carroll Buck, First Assistant Attorney General, and Edward, M. Carmouche and John L. Madden, Assistant Attorneys General, for plaintiff.
Barnes v. North Carolina
BARNES v. NORTH CAROLINA. No. 385, Misc. Decided October 14, 1963. Samuel S. Mitchell for petitioner. Thomas Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and James F. Bullock, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Tabb v. California
TABB v. CALIFORNIA. No. 83, Misc. Decided October 14, 1963. Petitioner pro se. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Herrera v. Heinze
HERRERA v. HEINZE, WARDEN. No. 82, Misc. Decided October 14, 1963. Petitioner pro se. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, and Edsel W. Haws, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
Nicholson v. Boles
NICHOLSON v. BOLES, WARDEN. No. 68, Misc. Decided October 14, 1963. Petitioner pro se. C. Donald Robertson, Attorney General of West Virginia, and George H. Mitchell and J. Patrick Bower, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
Ausbie v. California
AUSBIE v. CALIFORNIA. No. 52, Misc. Decided October 14, 1963. Petitioner pro se. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Cooper v. Alabama
COOPER v. ALABAMA. No. 32, Misc. Decided October 14, 1963. Petitioner pro se. Richmond M. Flowers, Attorney General of Alabama, and David W. Clark, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Shockey v. Illinois
SHOCKEY v. ILLINOIS. No. 20, Misc. Decided October 14, 1963. John R. Snively for petitioner. William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, for respondent.
Newsome v. North Carolina
NEWSOME v. NORTH CAROLINA. No. 11, Misc. Decided October 14, 1963. Petitioner pro se. Thomas Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Ralph Moody, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Scarnato v. LaVallee
SCARNATO v. LaVALLEE, WARDEN. No. 8, Misc. Decided October 14, 1963. Petitioner pro se. Louis J. Lejkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, and Winifred C. Stanley, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Wabaningo Boy Scout Camp v. Michigan Tax Commission
WABANINGO BOY SCOUT CAMP v. MICHIGAN TAX COMMISSION. No. 231. Decided October 14, 1963. Amos M. Mathews and Alban Weber for appellant in each case. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of Michigan, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and
Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago & Illinois Midland Railway Co.
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMEN et al. v. CHICAGO & ILLINOIS MIDLAND RAILWAY CO. No. 225. Decided October 14, 1963. Robert A. Stuart for petitioners.
King v. King
KING et al. v. KING et al. No. 153, Misc. Decided October 14, 1963. Appellants pro se. William K. Meadow and Robert B. Troutman for appellees.
Reatz v. New York
REATZ v. NEW YORK. No. 50, Misc. Decided October 14, 1963. Petitioner pro se. William I. Siegel for respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.