Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1964 Cases
641 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States v. Barnett
UNITED STATES v. BARNETT et al. No. 107. Argued October 21-22, 1963. Decided April 6, 1964. Solicitor General Cox and Leon Jaworski argued the cause for the United States. With them on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Lou
United States v. First National Bank & Trust Co.
UNITED STATES v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK & TRUST CO. OF LEXINGTON et al. No. 36. Argued March 4-5, 1964. Decided April 6, 1964. Daniel M. Friedman argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorn
United States v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.
UNITED STATES v. EL PASO NATURAL GAS CO. et al. No. 94. Argued February 25-26, 1964. Decided April 6, 1964. Solicitor General Cox argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Robert L. Wright, Frank Goodman and Robert
Standley v. United States
No. 624, Misc. No. 818, Misc. No. 868, Misc. No. 902, Misc. No. 941, Misc. Standley v. United States, Franco v. United States, Magee et al. v. California, Dandy v. Myers, Correctional Superintendent, Karl v. Richardson, Warden,
Camplain v. Oklahoma
No. 1068, Misc. Camplain v. Oklahoma et al.
Twining v. United States
No. 857, Misc. Twining v. United States. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Ronald L. Gainer for the United States.
Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners Local Union 1780
No. 725. No. 827. Pan American World Airways, Inc., v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local Union 1780, et al.; and United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local Union 1780, et al. v. Pan American Worl
Waller v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
No. 829. Waller v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. Charles B. Nye for petitioner.
Cosmark v. Struthers Wells Corp.
No. 751. Cosmark et al. v. Struthers Wells Corp. et al. George J. Barco and Yolanda G. Barco for petitioners. John C. Bane, Jr. and John G. Wayman for Struthers Wells Corp., and Louis Sherman and Laurence J. Cohen for International Brotherh
Grove Press, Inc. v. Gerstein
No. 718. Grove Press, Inc., v. Gerstein et al. Edward de Grazia and Richard Yale Feder for petitioner on the motion.
Hamilton v. Alabama
HAMILTON v. ALABAMA. No. 793. Decided March 30, 1964. Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III and Oscar W. Adams, Jr. for petitioner. Richmond M. Flowers, Attorney General of Alabama, and Bernard F. Sykes and Owen Bridges, Assistant Attorneys G
Sells v. Welsh
SELLS et al. v. WELSH, GOVERNOR OF INDIANA, et al. No. 803. Decided March 30, 1964. Lloyd L. DeWester, Jr. and J. Albert Woll for appellants. Alan W. Boyd for appellees.
Suburban Telephone Co. v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.
SUBURBAN TELEPHONE CO. v. MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. et al. No. 800. Decided March 30, 1964. J. Kenneth Baird and Robert A. Sprecher for appellant. J. H. Shepherd for Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co., and Julian S. E
In re Crow
IN RE CROW. No. 767. Decided March 30, 1964. Appellant pro se. William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, for the Supreme Court of Ohio, in opposition.
Van Dusen v. Barrack
VAN DUSEN, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE, et al. v. BARRACK, ADMINISTRATRIX, et al. Nos. 56 and 80. Argued January 8-9, 1964. Decided March 30, 1964. Owen B. Rhoads argued the cause for petitioners in No. 56. With him on the briefs were George J. Mi
Rabinowitz v. Kennedy
RABINOWITZ et al. v. KENNEDY, ATTORNEY GENERAL. No. 287. Argued March 2, 1964. Decided March 30, 1964. David Rein argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioners. Stephen J. Pollak argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief we
Ungar v. Sarafite
UNGAR v. SARAFITE, JUDGE OF THE COURT OF GENERAL SESSIONS OF THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK. No. 167. Argued February 24, 1964. Decided March 30, 1964. Osmond K. Fraenkel and Emanuel Redfield argued the cause for appellant. Mr. Redfield also filed
Mrvica v. Esperdy
MRVICA v. ESPERDY, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE. No. 353. Argued March 5, 1964. Decided March 30, 1964. Edith Lowenstein argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Richard W. Schmude argued the cause for
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Livingston
JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC., v. LIVINGSTON, PRESIDENT OF DISTRICT 65, RETAIL, WHOLESALE AND DEPARTMENT STORE UNION, AFL-CIO. No. 91. Argued January 9, 13, 1964. Decided March 30, 1964. Charles H. Lieb argued the cause for petitioner. With him o
Rugendorf v. United States
RUGENDORF v. UNITED STATES. No. 223. Argued February 27, 1964. Decided March 30, 1964. Julius Lucius Echeles argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Melvin B. Lewis and Howard W. Minn. David C. Acheson argued the cause
Federal Power Commission v. Hunt
FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION v. HUNT et al. No. 273. Argued March 2, 1964. Decided March 30, 1964. Richard A. Solomon argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Cox, Ralph S. Spritzer, Howard E. Wahrenbrock an
Williamson v. Peurifoy
No. 574. Williamson et al., Executors, v. Peurifoy, Judge,
Causey v. California
No. 1070, Misc. Causey v. California.
Wright v. Rhay
No. 970, Misc. Wright v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.