Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1964 Cases
641 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Pate v. Page
No. 972, Misc. Pate v. Page, Warden. Melvin L. Wulf for petitioner. Charles Nesbitt, Attorney General of Oklahoma, and Jack A. Swidensky, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Reagan v. Sinclair Refining Co.
No. 945, Misc. Reagan v. Sinclair Refining Co. W. A. Combs for petitioner. Leroy Denman Moody for respondent.
Enos v. Zuckert
No. 846, Misc. Enos v. Zuckert, Secretary of the Air Force, et al. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Douglas and Sherman L. Cohn for respondents.
Southern Pilots Ass'n v. Civil Aeronautics Board
No. 743. Southern Pilots Association et al. v. Civil Aeronautics Board et al. Philip F. Herrick and Nicholas E. Allen for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Joseph B. Goldman, O. D. Ozm
Berstein v. Missouri
No. 816. Berstein, alias Berns, v. Missouri. Bernard J. Mellman for petitioner.
Loyal Protective Life Insurance Co. v. Monarch Life Insurance Co.
No. 796. Loyal Protective Life Insurance Co. v. Monarch Life Insurance Co. Donald M. Dunn and Eugene Z. DuBose for petitioner. Herbert Brownell for respondent.
Federal Employees' Distributing Co. v. United States
No. 778. Federal Employees’ Distributing Co. v. United States. Edward L. Butterworth for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox and Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer for the United States.
Gorsuch v. DePinto
No. 709. No. 790. No. 802. Gorsuch et al. v. DePinto et al.; Duhame v. Provident Security Life Insurance Co. et al.; and DePinto v. Provident Security Life Insurance Co. et al. James Wm. Moore, William Lee McLane and Nola Mc-Lane for petiti
Turner v. Louisiana
No. 763, Misc. Turner v. Louisiana. Burrell J. Carter for appellant. Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, and Michael E. Culligan, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
National Council on the Facts of Overpopulation v. Sirica
No. 966, Misc. National Council on the Facts of Overpopulation v. Sirica, U. S. District Judge. A. Lincoln Green for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Meyer Roth-wacks for respondent.
Garrison v. Louisiana
March 23, 1964. No. 400. Garrison v. Louisiana. Eberhard P. Deutsch on the motion.
Auclair Transportation, Inc. v. United States
AUCLAIR TRANSPORTATION, INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 724. Decided March 23, 1964. Peter T. Beardsley and Richard R. Sigmon for appellants. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Or-rick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. G
Fawcett Publications, Inc. v. Morris
FAWCETT PUBLICATIONS, INC., v. MORRIS. No. 57. Decided March 23, 1964. Howard Ellis, Perry S. Patterson, Don H. Reuben and Thomas A. Diskin for appellant. C. E. Ram Morrison for appellee.
Kirk v. Boehm
KIRK v. BOEHM, SUPERINTENDENT, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, PENNSYLVANIA, et al. No. 753. Decided March 23, 1964. Appellant pro se. John D. Killian III, Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Lewis B. Beatty, Jr. for appellees.
Jackson v. United States
JACKSON et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 361. Argued March 4, 1964. Decided March 23, 1964. Paul Burks argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Edward L. Compton and John C. Argue. John B. Jones, Jr. argued the cause for th
United Steelworkers v. National Labor Relations Board
UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, et al. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD et al. No. 89. Argued February 19, 1964. Decided March 23, 1964. Jerry D. Anker argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were David E. Feller,
Stoner v. California
STONER v. CALIFORNIA. No. 209. Argued February 25, 1964. Decided March 23, 1964. William H. Dempsey, Jr., by appointment of the Court, 375 U. S. 805, argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner. Arlo E. Smith, Chief Assistant Attorney
Boire v. Greyhound Corp.
BOIRE, REGIONAL DIRECTOR, TWELFTH REGION, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, v. GREYHOUND CORPORATION. No. 77. Argued February 17, 1964. Decided March 23, 1964. Norton J. Come argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicit
Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino
BANCO NACIONAL de CUBA v. SABBATINO, RECEIVER, et al. No. 16. Argued October 22-23, 1963. Decided March 23, 1964. Victor Rabinowitz argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Leonard B. Boudin. C. Dickerman Williams argued
United States v. J. B. Montgomery, Inc.
UNITED STATES et al. v. J. B. MONTGOMERY, INC. No. 66. Argued January 8, 1964. Decided March 23, 1964. Frank I. Goodman, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, argued the cause for the United States et al. With him on the briefs were Soli
A. L. Mechling Barge Lines, Inc. v. United States
A. L. MECHLING BARGE LINES, INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 58. Argued February 18, 1964. Decided March 23, 1964. Edward B. Hayes argued the cause and filed briefs for appellants in No. 58. Harold E. Spencer argued the cause for ap
Humble Pipe Line Co. v. Waggonner
HUMBLE PIPE LINE CO. v. WAGGONNER, SHERIFF. No. 329. Argued March 4, 1964. Decided March 23, 1964. Leon O’Quin argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner in No. 329. Clarence L. Yancey argued the cause for petitioners in No. 354. With
Preston v. United States
PRESTON v. UNITED STATES. No. 163. Argued February 25, 1964. Decided March 23, 1964. Francis M. Shea, by appointment of the Court, 374 U. S. 823, argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner. Sidney M. Glazer argued the cause for the Un
Bruning v. United States
BRUNING v. UNITED STATES. No. 423. Argued March 3, 1964. Decided March 23, 1964. Ernest R. Mortenson argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Philip B. Heymann argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Sol
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.