Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1964 Cases
641 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Honeywood v. Rockefeller
HONEYWOOD et al. v. ROCKEFELLER, GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK, et al. No. 267. Decided March 2, 1964. Moses M. Falk for appellants. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Irving Galt, Assistant Solicitor General, Sheldon Raab, Assistant
Kreznar v. United States
KREZNAR et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 85. Decided March 2, 1964. Sidney Dickstein, David I. Shapiro and George Kauf-mann for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Douglas and Alan S. Rosenthal for the United S
Federal Power Commission v. Southern California Edison Co.
FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION v. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. et al. No. 71. Argued January 14, 1964. Decided March 2, 1964. Ralph S. Spritzer argued the cause for petitioner in No. 71. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Cox, Frank
Rhoads v. Washington
No. 962, Misc. Rhoads v. Washington.
Evans v. Thomas
No. 933, Misc. Evans v. Thomas, Warden.
Abreu v. Heritage
No. 668, Misc. Abreu v. Heritage, Warden. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Harold H. Greene and Howard A. Glickstein for respondent.
Mishne v. Ohio
No. 744. Mishne et al. v. Ohio. Adrian B. Fink, Jr. for petitioners. William Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, for respondent.
Evanston-North Shore Board of Realtors v. United States
No. 736. Evanston-North Shore Board of Realtors v. United States. Theodore A. Groenke for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorjer and Melva M. Graney for the United States.
Ginsburg v. Stern
No. 234. Ginsburg v. Stern et al. Paul Ginsburg on the motion.
Wolfsohn v. Hankin
WOLFSOHN, EXECUTRIX, v. HANKIN et al. No. 680. Decided February 24, 1964. Fred I. Simon for petitioner. Gregory Hankin, pro se, and John V. Long for respondent Hankin.
Neill v. Cook
NEILL et al. v. COOK et al. No. 691. Decided February 24, 1964. A. B. Culbertson for appellants. Joe A. Moss for appellees.
Diamond v. Louisiana
DIAMOND v. LOUISIANA. No. 100. Argued February 20, 1964. Decided February 24, 1964. James M. Nabrit III argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Jack Greenberg, Wiley A. Branton and Johnnie A. Jones. Ralph L. Roy argued t
United States v. Merz
UNITED STATES v. MERZ et al. No. 65. Argued January 13-14, 1964. Decided February 24, 1964. Roger P. Marquis argued the cause for the United States in No. 65. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Cox and Raymond N. Zagone. Denver W.
Tyrell v. Berdecia
No. 219. No. 479. No. 506. No. 531. No. 538. No. 598. No. 616. No. 528, Misc. No. 653, Misc. No. 693, Misc. No. 704, Misc. Tyrell et al. v. Berdecia, Beck v. United States, Frank Adams & Co. et al. v. United States et al., Cooper v. United
King v. Washington
No. 918, Misc. King v. Washington et al.
Bowen v. Illinois
No. 894, Misc. Bowen v. Illinois.
Cortez v. California
No. 871, Misc. Cortez v. California.
Leibowitz v. LaVallee
No. 855, Misc. Leibowitz v. LaVallee, Warden. Joseph Aronstein for petitioner. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, and Anthony J. Lokot, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Burd v. Wilkins
No. 835, Misc. Burd v. Wilkins, Warden. Petitioner pro se. Louis J. Lefkowits, Attorney General of New York, Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, and Winifred C. Stanley, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Doyon v. Robbins
No. 822, Misc. Doyon v. Robbins, Warden. Petitioner pro se. Frank E. Hancock, Attorney General of Maine, and John W. Benoit, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Ramsey v. Boles
No. 809, Misc. Ramsey v. Boles, Warden.
Reynolds v. United States
No. 787, Misc. Reynolds v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Sidney M. Glazer for the United States.
Mavity v. Associates Discount Corp.
No. 779, Misc. Mavity v. Associates Discount Corp. Harold H. Gearinger and Charles C. Moore for petitioner. Robert Edward Surles for respondent.
Mora v. United States
No. 709, Misc. Mora v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Richard W. Schmude for the United States.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.