US Case Law Library

Find court opinions that match your case.

Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.

313,007+
Court Opinions
266
1754–2019 Span
265
Courts Represented
7,507+
Attorneys with Cases

Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions

The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.

1964 Cases

641 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.

Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Outcome n/a 1964

Dombrowski v. Pfister

No. 52. Dombrowski et al. v. Pfister, Chairman, Joint Legislative Committee on Un-American Activities of the Louisiana Legislature, et al. Jack N. Rogers and Robert H. Reiter for appellees on the motion.

379 U.S. 919 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Dismissed Tax Law 1964

McCulloch v. California Franchise Tax Board

McCULLOCH v. CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD. No. 472. Decided November 23, 1964. Walter L. Nossaman for appellant. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Dan Kaufmann, Assistant Attorney General, and Ernest P. Goodman and Harry W.

379 U.S. 133 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Affirmed 1964

Northwestern Pacific Railroad v. Interstate Commerce Commission

NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION et al. No. 381. Decided November 23, 1964. Randolph Kan for appellant. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Arthur J. Murphy, Jr., an

379 U.S. 132 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Outcome n/a Employment Law 1964

Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. State Corp. Commission

COLORADO INTERSTATE GAS CO. v. STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF KANSAS et al. No. 75. Decided November 23, 1964. Lewis M. Poe, Jr., James Lawrence White and Malcolm Miller for appellant in No. 75. F. Vinson Roach, Patrick J. McCarthy, Mark H

379 U.S. 131 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Affirmed 1964

Independent Petroleum Workers of America, Inc. v. American Oil Co.

INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM WORKERS OF AMERICA, INC. v. AMERICAN OIL CO. No. 55. Argued November 9, 1964. Decided November 23, 1964. David E. Feller argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were William Belshaw, Benedict R. Danko,

379 U.S. 130 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Outcome n/a 1964

Schlagenhauf v. Holder

SCHLAGENHAUF v. HOLDER, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA. No. 8. Argued October 13, 1964. Decided November 23, 1964. Robert S. Smith argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Wilbert Mclnerney. Eri

379 U.S. 104 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Outcome n/a 1964

Beck v. Ohio

BECK v. OHIO. No. 18. Argued October 15, 1964. Decided November 23, 1964. James R. Willis argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Jay B. White. William T. McKnight argued the cause for respondent. With .him on the brief w

379 U.S. 89 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Outcome n/a 1964

Garrison v. Louisiana

GARRISON v. LOUISIANA. No. 4. Argued April 22, 1964. Restored to the calendar for reargument June 22, 1964. Reargued October 19, 1964. Decided November 23, 1964. Eberhard P. D&utsch reargued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs w

379 U.S. 64 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Outcome n/a 1964

Ryan v. United States

RYAN v. UNITED STATES. No. 12. Argued October 14, 1964. Decided November 23, 1964. William R. Bagby argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner. Bruce J. Terris argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor Genera

379 U.S. 61 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Outcome n/a 1964

United States v. Powell

UNITED STATES et al. v. POWELL et al. No. 54. Argued October 14-15, 1964. Decided November 23, 1964. Bruce 3. Terris argued the cause for the United States et al. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General

379 U.S. 48 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Outcome n/a 1964

Creek Nation East v. United States

No. 102. Creek Nation East of the Mississippi v. United States,

379 U.S. 918 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Outcome n/a 1964

Emanuelson v. Minnesota

No. 355, Misc. Emanuelson v. Minnesota.

379 U.S. 917 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Outcome n/a Employment Law 1964

Truck Drivers Union Local No. 413, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. National Labor Relations Board

No. 453. Truck Drivers Union Local No. 413, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, et al. v. National Labor Relations Board. David Previant, Herbert S. Thatcher and L. N. D. Wells, Jr.,for pet

379 U.S. 916 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Outcome n/a 1964

Rhodes v. Meyer

No. 450. Rhodes v. Meyer et al. Petitioner pro se. Clarence A. H. Meyer, Attorney General of Nebraska, and Robert A. Nelson, Special Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.

379 U.S. 915 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Outcome n/a 1964

Murdock v. Maryland

No. 435. Murdock v. Maryland. Michael F. X. Dolan for petitioner.

379 U.S. 914 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Outcome n/a 1964

Burnett v. New York Central Railroad

No. 437. Burnett v. New York Central Railroad Co. Otto F. Put-nick for petitioner. Robert M. Dennis for respondent.

379 U.S. 913 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Outcome n/a 1964

Federal Trade Commission v. Consolidated Foods Corp.

No. 422. Federal Trade Commission v. Consolidated Foods Corp. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant .Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel and James Mel. Henderson for petitioner. Anderson A, Owen and Daniel Walker for respondent. Bruce Gris

379 U.S. 912 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Outcome n/a 1964

Nebraska v. Iowa

No. 17, Original. Nebraska v. Iowa. Roy M. Harrop, pro se, on the motion.

379 U.S. 911 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Dismissed 1964

Boyer v. Elkins

BOYER et al. v. ELKINS et al. No. 438. Decided November 16, 1964. George J. Francis for appellants. Frank A. Bruno and H. D. Reed for appellees.

379 U.S. 47 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Remanded 1964

Boles v. Stevenson

BOLES, WARDEN v. STEVENSON. No. 298. Decided November 16, 1964. Charles Robert Sarver and Claude A. Joyce, Assistant Attorneys General of West Virginia, for petitioner. Daniel J. Meador for respondent.

379 U.S. 43 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Remanded 1964

Scranton v. Drew

SCRANTON, GOVERNOR OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al. v. DREW et al. No. 201. Decided November 16, 1964. Walter E. Alessandroni, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Edward Friedman and Alan Miles Ruben, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellants. Marv

379 U.S. 40 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Outcome n/a 1964

Brulotte v. Thys Co.

BRULOTTE et al. v. THYS CO. No. 20. Argued October 20, 1964. Decided November 16, 1964. Edward S. Irons argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs was Charles C. Countryman.- Elwood Hutcheson argued the cause for respondent. W

379 U.S. 29 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Outcome n/a Tax Law 1964

Strite v. McGinnes

No. 258. No. 66, No. 82, No. 85, No. 129, No. 172, Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Strite et al., Executors v. McGinnes, District Director of Internal Revenue, Hipp v. Smith et al., Johnson v. Shovlin, State Hospital Superintendent, Matthewso

379 U.S. 910 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion
Outcome n/a 1964

Nutt v. United States

No. 369, Misc. Nutt v. United States. Wm. J. Holloway, Jr., for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.

379 U.S. 909 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Need an attorney for a case like these?

Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.