Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1964 Cases
641 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Bynum v. United States
No. 368, Misc. Bynum v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox for the United States.
Martinez v. United States
No. 321, Misc. Martinez v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox for the United States.
Collins v. Klinger
No. 327, Misc. Collins v. Klinger.
Nickens v. United States
No. 220, Misc. Nickens v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox for the United States.
Lapin v. Shulton, Inc.
No. 428. Lapin et al. v. Shulton, Inc., et al. Francis George Staple-ton for petitioners. Melvin H. Siegel for respondents.
Halio v. New York
No. 421. Halio v. New York. Maurice Edelbaum for petitioner. William Cahn for respondent.
Lapensohn v. Pennsylvania
No. 419. No. 420. Lapensohn v. Pennsylvania; and Cohen et al. v. Pennsylvania. Morton Within and Stanford Shmukler for petitioner in No. 419. Edward Davis, John Patrick Walsh and John Rogers Carroll for petitioners in No. 420. Arlen Specter
Hanchey v. Collins
No. 407. Hanchey, Warden v. Collins. Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, for petitioner;
Kleinman v. Saminsky
No. 392. Kleinman et al. v. Saminsky et al. Alex Elson, Willard J. Lassers and Aaron S. Wolff for petiT tioners. A If red Jaretzki, Jr., Marvin Schwartz, James M. Tunnell, Jr., and William S. Megonigal, Jr., for respondents.
Todd v. Joint Apprenticeship Committee
No. 380. Todd et al. v. Joint Apprenticeship Committee et al.
Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor
No. 138, October Term, 1963. Murphy et al. v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor. William P. Sirignano on the motion. Harold Krieger for petitioners, in opposition.
Dombrowski v. Pfister
No. 52. Dombrowski et al. v. Pfister, Chairman, Joint Legislative Committee on Un-American Activities of the Louisiana Legislature, et al. Jack Greenberg, Derrick A. Bell, Jr., and Jay.H. Topkis for NAACP Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.
Hill v. New York
November 9, 1964. No. 914, Misc., October Term, 1963. Hill v. New York.
Trautwein v. Community Redevelopment Agency
TRAUTWEIN et al. v. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF LOS ANGELES. No. 416. Decided November 9, 1964. Frank Wickhem for appellants in No. 416. Appellants pro se in No. 426. Henry O. Duque for appellee in both cases. Austin Clapp for John Sw
Hooper v. Duncan
HOOPER v. DUNCAN, SUPERINTENDENT, DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR LICENSES AND CONTROL OF ARIZONA, et al. No. 393. Decided November 9, 1964. Alfred C. Marquez for appellant.
Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employes v. United Air Lines, Inc.
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY & STEAMSHIP CLERKS, FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS & STATION EMPLOYES v. UNITED AIR LINES, INC. No. 31. Argued October 22, 1964. Decided November 9, 1964. James L. Highsaw, Jr., argued the cause for petitioner. With him on
National Labor Relations Board v. Burnup & Sims, Inc.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. BURNUP & SIMS, INC. No. 15. Argued October 15, 1964. Decided November 9, 1964. Arnold Ordman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Cox, Dominick L. Manóli and Norton
Carbonaro v. New York
No. 423, Misc. Carbonaro et al. v. New York. Leon B. Polsky for petitioners. Frank S. Hogan and H. Richard Uviller for respondent.
Gonzalez v. California Adult Authority
No. 244, Misc. Gonzalez v. California Adult Authority.
Duffy v. New York
No. 143, Misc. Duffy v. New York. Petitioner pro se. Isidore Dollinger and Bertram R. Gelfand for respondent.
Bantom v. United States
No. 382. Bantom et al. v. United States. Claude L. Dawson and Donald M. Murtha for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Douglas and Sherman L. Cohn for the United States.
Anthony P. Miller, Inc. v. Walter S. Kozdranski Co.
No. 368. Anthony P. Miller, Inc., et al. v. Walter S. Kozdranski Co., Inc., et al. John W. Cragun, Paul M. Rhodes and Charles A. Hobbs for petitioners. John E. Ruñáis for respondents.
Philip Carey Manufacturing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
No. 366. Philip Carey Manufacturing Co. (Miami Cabinet Division) v. National Labor Relations Board et al. John B. Hol-lister for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Arnold Ord-man, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for respondent Nationa
General Motors Corp. v. District of Columbia
No. 352. General Motors Corp. v. District of Columbia. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit granted. Aloysius F. Power, Donald K. Barnes, Thomas J. Hughes and E. Barrett
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.