Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1965 Cases
590 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad
No. 1054. No. 1070. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers et al. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co. et al.; and Hardin et al. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co. et al. James E. Youngdahl for appellants in No. 1054. Bru
Texas v. New Jersey
No. 13, Original. Texas v. New Jersey et al. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, Alan B. Handler, First Assistant Attorney General, and Charles J. Kehoe, Deputy Attorney General, on the motion.
Knowles v. Florida
KNOWLES v. FLORIDA. No. 884, Misc. Decided June 7, 1965. Petitioner pro se. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and George R. Georgieff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Federal Power Commission v. Pan American Petroleum Corp.
FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION v. PAN AMERICAN PETROLEUM CORP. No. 1024. Decided June 7, 1965. Solicitor General Cox, Richard A. Solomon, Howard E. Wahrenbrock, Robert L. Russell and Peter H. Schiff for petitioner in No. 1024. Herbert E. Squires
Associated Food Retailers of Greater Chicago, Inc. v. Jewel Tea Co.
ASSOCIATED FOOD RETAILERS OF GREATER CHICAGO, INC., et al. v. JEWEL TEA CO., INC. No. 321. Decided June 7, 1965. Eugene Kart for petitioners. George B. Christensen, Fred H. Daugherty, Theodore A. Groenke and Samuel Weisbard for respondent.
California v. Hurst
CALIFORNIA v. HURST. No. 45. Decided June 7, 1965. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, and Edsel W. Haws, Deputy Attorney General, for petitioner.
Cameron v. Johnson
CAMERON et al. v. JOHNSON, GOVERNOR OF MISSISSIPPI, et al. No. 587, Misc. Decided June 7, 1965. Arthur Kinoy, William M. Kunstler, Benjamin E. Smith, Bruce C. Waltzer, Melvin Wulf and Morton Stavis for appellants. Joe T. Patterson, Attorney
Federal Trade Commission v. Texaco, Inc.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. TEXACO, INC., et al. No. 635. Decided June 7, 1965. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, James Mel. Henderson, Alvin L. Berman and Louis R. Harding for petitioner. Milton H
Local Union No. 189, Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen v. Jewel Tea Co.
LOCAL UNION NO. 189, AMALGAMATED MEAT CUTTERS & BUTCHER WORKMEN OF NORTH AMERICA, AFL-CIO, et al. v. JEWEL TEA CO., INC. No. 240. Argued January 27-28, 1965. Decided June 7, 1965. Bernard, Dunau argued the cause for petitioners. With him on
United Mine Workers v. Pennington
UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA v. PENNINGTON et al. No. 48. Argued January 27, 1965. Decided June 7, 1965. Harrison Combs argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were E. H. Bayson, R. R. Kramer and M. E. Boiarsky. John A. Ro
Angelet v. Fay
ANGELET v. FAY, WARDEN. No. 578. Argued March 11, 1965. Decided June 7, 1965. Leon B. Polsky argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Gray Thoron argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney Gene
Linkletter v. Walker
LINKLETTER v. WALKER, WARDEN. No. 95. Argued March 11, 1965. Decided June 7, 1965. Euel A. Screios, Jr., argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Truman Hobbs. Teddy W. Airhart, Jr., Assistant Attorney General of Louisiana
Estes v. Texas
ESTES v. TEXAS. No. 256. Argued April 1, 1965. Decided June 7, 1965. John D. Cofer and Hume Cofer argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, and Leon Jaworski, Special Assistant Attorney Gen
Griswold v. Connecticut
GRISWOLD et al. v. CONNECTICUT. No. 496. Argued March 29-30, 1965. Decided June 7, 1965. Thomas I. Emerson argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs was Catherine O. Roraback. Joseph B. Clark argued the cause for appellee. Wit
United States v. Brown
UNITED STATES v. BROWN. No. 399. Argued March 29, 1965. Decided June 7, 1965. Solicitor General Cox argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Yeagley, Nathan Lewin, Kevin T. Maroney and Ge
Johnson v. California
No. 1251, Misc. Johnson v. California.
Newkirk v. New York
No. 1207, Misc. Newkirk v. New York.
Headrick v. Illinois
No. 1177, Misc. Headrick v. Illinois. John R. Snively for petitioner.
O'Neill v. Rundle
No. 1149, Misc. O’Neill v. Rundle, Warden.
Clark v. Payne
No. 1122, Misc. Clark v. Payne.
Douglas v. Rhay
No. 1098, Misc. Douglas v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent.
Hilbrich v. United States
No. 1055, No. 1159, Misc. Misc. Hilbrich v. United States; and Uselding v. United States. George L. Saunders, Jr., for petitioner in No. 1055, Misc. James E. Knox, Jr., for petitioner in No. 1159, Misc. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Atto
Barkan v. United States
No. 967, Misc. Barkan v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.
Ratke v. United States
No. 1106. Ratke et al. v. United States. Milton A. Bass and Solomon H. Friend for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.