Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1965 Cases
590 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Skolnick v. Martin
No. 1069. Skolnick v. Martin et al. Petitioner pro se. Walter T. Fisher for respondent Martin.
Zimmerman v. Lehmann
No. 1041. Zimmerman v. Lehmann, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service. Maurice J. Walsh and Anna R. Lavin for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for respond
Avgikos v. Louisiana
No. 832. Avgikos v. Louisiana. Chester E. Wallace for petitioner. Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, and M. E. Culligan and Harry J. Kron, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
Lishey v. California
No. 1167, Misc. Lishey v. California et al.
McLeod v. Ohio
McLEOD v. OHIO. No. 1117, Misc. Decided May 24, 1965. Petitioner pro se. James V. Barbuto and John D. Smith for respondent.
Walker v. Georgia
WALKER v. GEORGIA. No. 1072. Decided May 24, 1965. Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III and Donald L. Hollowell for petitioner. Lewis B. Slaton and Carter Goode for respondent.
Samara v. Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Authority
SAMARA et al. v. OKLAHOMA CAPITOL IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY. No. 1002. Decided May 24, 1965. Leroy Powers and Gus Rinehart for appellants. Charles Nesbitt, Attorney General of Oklahoma, and Harvey H. Cody and Joseph C. Muskrat, Assistant Attorn
Baxa v. United States
BAXA et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 957. Decided May 24, 1965. Melvin B. Lewis and Howard W. Minn for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Kirby W. Patterson for the United State
Columbia Artists Management Inc. v. United States
COLUMBIA ARTISTS MANAGEMENT INC. et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 775. Decided May 24, 1965. Seymour D. Lewis and Ralph F. Colin for appellants. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum and Elliott H. Mo
Case v. Nebraska
CASE v. NEBRASKA. No. 843. Argued April 28, 1965. Decided May 24, 1965. Daniel J. Meador, by appointment of the Court, 379 U. S. 995, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Melvin Kent Kammerlohr, Assistant Attorney General of N
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. New Jersey Wood Finishing Co.
MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO. v. NEW JERSEY WOOD FINISHING CO. No. 291. Argued April 29, 1965. Decided May 24, 1965. Sidney P. Howell, Jr., argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Charles C. Trelease and Edwin E.
Lamont v. Postmaster General
LAMONT, dba BASIC PAMPHLETS v. POSTMASTER GENERAL. No. 491. Argued April 26, 1965. Decided May 24, 1965. Leonard B. Boudin argued the cause for appellant in No. 491. With him on the briefs were Victor Rabino-witz, Norman Dorsen and Henry Wi
Federal Communications Commission v. Schreiber
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION v. SCHREIBER et al. No. 482. Argued April 27, 1965. Decided May 24, 1965. Assistant Attorney General Douglas argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Cox, Nathan Lewin,
McCarty v. Anderson
May 19, 1965. No. 1051, Misc. McCarty v. Anderson, Jail Superintendent. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox for respondent.
Thomas v. United States
No. 113. No. 193. No. 865. No. 897. No. 886, No. 893, Misc. Misc. Thomas et ux. v. United States, Romano et al. v. United States, Patsis, aka Nickas v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Casida et al. v. International Union of Operatin
Lane v. United States
No. 1131, Misc. Lane v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox for the United States.
Kerns v. United States
No. 1034, Misc. Kerns v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Ronald L. Gainer for the United States.
Basha v. Michigan
No. 986, Misc. Basha v. Michigan.
Cook v. Maxwell
No. 869, Misc. Cook v. Maxwell, Warden. Petitioner pro se. William, B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, and Leo J. Conway, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Peoples v. United States
No. 692, Misc. Peoples v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Julia P. Cooper for the United States.
Harrington v. Texaco, Inc.
No. 1058. Harrington v. Texaco, Inc. Petitioner pro se. William, Alan Mudgett and Jack W. Flock for respondent.
Plaza Liquor Store, Inc. v. City of Atlanta
No. 1038. Plaza Liquor Store, Inc. v. City of Atlanta. Robert L. Mitchell for petitioner. Henry L. Bowden, Martin McFarland and Lewis R. Slaton for respondent.
Dinsio v. Ohio
No. 1008. Dinsio v. Ohio. Lawrence V. Cregan and Ben F. Kelly for petitioner.
Fore v. United States
No. 927. Fore v. United States. Larry W. Morris and Bennett B. Patterson for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Joseph Kovner for the United States.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.