Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1965 Cases
584 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Gunther v. San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway Co.
GUNTHER v. SAN DIEGO & ARIZONA EASTERN RAILWAY CO. No. 27. Argued November 8, 1965. Decided December 8, 1965. Charles W. Decker argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Clifton Hildebrand. Waldron A. Gregory argued the cau
Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. Brenner
HAZELTINE RESEARCH, INC., et al. v. BRENNER, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS. No. 57. Argued November 17, 1965. Decided December 8, 1965. Laurence B. Dodds argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs was George R. Jones. J. William Doo
Western Pacific Railroad v. United States
WESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 12. Argued October 19, 1965. Decided December 7, 1965. Paul Bender, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, and Walter G. Treanor argued the cause for appellants. With Mr. Ben
United Gas Improvement Co. v. Callery Properties, Inc.
UNITED GAS IMPROVEMENT CO. et al. v. CALLERY PROPERTIES, INC., et al. No. 21. Argued October 18-19, 1965. Decided December 7, 1965 Richard A. Solomon argued the cause for the Federal Power Commission. With him on the brief were Acting Solic
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers, Local 283 v. Scofield
INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE & AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 283 v. SCOFIELD et al. No. 18. Argued October 20, 1965. Decided December 7, 1965 Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., argued the cause for petitio
Millwood v. California
No. 733, Misc. Millwood v. California et al.
Kemp v. Florida
No. 725, Misc. Kemp v. Florida. Marco Loffredo for petitioner.
Lamma v. United States
No. 627, Misc. Lamma v. United States. J. Robert Lunney for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, and Philip R. Monahan for the United States.
Palomera v. Willingham
No. 480, Misc. Palomera v. Willingham, Warden. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Doar, David Rubin and Gerald P. Choppin for respondent.
Rance v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.
No. 582. Rance et al. v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co. John H. Cantrell for petitioners. Samuel M. Lane, Claus Motulsky and G. M. Fuller for respondent.
Maxwell v. Stephens
No. 429. Maxwell v. Stephens, Penitentiary Superintendent. Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Michael Meltsner, Anthony G. Amsterdam, George Howard, Jr., and Harold B. Anderson for petitioner. Bruce Bennett, Attorney General of Arkansas,
Rhodes v. Edwards
No. 602. Rhodes v. Edwards et al.
Hagel v. Illinois
No. 585. Hagel v. Illinois. Albert E. Jenner, Jr., for petitioner.
Pittman v. United States
No. 578. Pittman v. United States. Fred Okrand for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Douglas and David L. Rose for the United States.
Thomson v. Carman
No. 559. Thomson et al. v. Carman et al. Alexander H. Schullman for petitioners. Michael G. Luddy for Carman et al., Charles G. Bakaly, Jr., for Association of Motion Picture Producers, Inc., et al., respondents.
Chance v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
No. 546. Chance v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. Anthony P. Nugent, Sr., for petitioner. George L. Gordon, Jr., for respondent.
Lauritzen v. Spann
No. 352. Lauritzen v. Spann. J. Ward O’Neill and Francis X. Byrn for petitioner. Philip Dorfman and John Dorfman for respondent. Cornelius P. Coughlan, J. Steward Harrison and Scott H. Elder for American Merchant Marine Institute, Inc., et
National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Overstreet
No. 505. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People et al. v. Overstreet. Donald L. Holloioell, Robert L. Carter and Maria L. Marcus for petitioners. Hugh P. Futrell, Jr., for respondent.
United States v. General Motors Corp.
No. 46. United States v. General Motors Corp. et al. Thomas A. Rothwell and William C. Hillman on the motion.
Wisconsin v. Minnesota
No. 21, Original. Wisconsin v. Minnesota et al. Bronson C. La Follette, Attorney General of Wisconsin, John H. Bowers, Deputy Attorney General, and A. J. Feijarek and Roy G. Tulane, Assistant Attorneys General, for plaintiff. Robert W. Matt
Solomon v. South Carolina
SOLOMON v. SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 588. Decided December 6, 1965. Ellis Lyons for appellant. Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and E. N. Brandon, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Misani v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.
MISANI v. ORTHO PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. et al. No. 595. Decided December 6, 1965. Appellant pro se. Clyde A. Szuch and Stanley C. Smoyer for appellees.
California Democratic Council v. Arnebergh
CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC COUNCIL et al. v. ARNEBERGH et al. No. 583. Decided December 6, 1965. Leon M. Cooper for appellants. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Charles A. Barrett, Assistant Attorney General, Sanford N. Gruskin,
George F. Hazelwood Co. v. Pitsenbarger
GEORGE F. HAZELWOOD CO. v. PITSENBARGER, ASSESSOR. No. 567. Decided December 6, 1965. Joseph A. Blundon for appellant. C. Donald Robertson, Attorney General of West Virginia, and George H. Mitchell and J. Patrick Bower, Assistant Attorneys
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.