Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1965 Cases
584 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Rogers v. Paul
ROGERS et al. v. PAUL et al. No. 532. Decided December 6, 1965. Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Derrick A. Bell, Jr., and George Howard, Jr., for petitioners. John P. Woods for respondents.
United States v. Huck Manufacturing Co.
UNITED STATES v. HUCK MANUFACTURING CO. et al. No. 8. Argued November 15, 1965. Decided December 6, 1965. Assistant Attorney General Turner argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Spritzer
Hanna Mining Co. v. District 2, Marine Engineers Beneficial Ass'n
HANNA MINING CO. et al. v. DISTRICT 2, MARINE ENGINEERS BENEFICIAL ASSOCIATION, AFL-CIO, et al. No. 7. Argued October 12, 1965. Decided December 6, 1965. John H. Hanninen argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Lucian Y.
Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food Machinery & Chemical Corp.
WALKER PROCESS EQUIPMENT, INC. v. FOOD MACHINERY & CHEMICAL CORP. No. 13. Argued October 12-13, 1965. Decided December 6, 1965. Charles J. Merriam argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Edward A. Haight and Louis Rober
Harris v. United States
HARRIS v. UNITED STATES. No. 6. Argued October 11-12, 1965. Decided December 6, 1965. Ronald L. Goldfarb argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were E. David Rosen and Jacob Kossman. Ralph S. Spritzer argued the cause for t
Wilson v. United States
No. 253, No. 298, No. 511, Misc. Misc. Misc. Wilson v. United States, Thacker v. Ward Markham Co., In re Duarte,
List v. Lerner
No. 66. No. 80. No. 83. No. 105. No. 119. No. 142. No. 152. No. 173. No. 189. No. 199. No. 210. No. 290. No. 278. No. 330. No. 334. No. 403. No. 405. No. 45, No. 186, No. 192, Misc. Misc. Misc. List v. Lerner, dba Lerner & Co., et al., Ring
Burton v. United States
No. 646, Misc. Burton v. United States. Frances Kahn for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
Yates v. Mississippi
No. 591, Misc. Yates v. Mississippi. Lawrence Speiser and Bernard Roa-zen for petitioner.
Montoya v. California
No. 257, Misc. Montoya v. California. Petitioner pro se. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Robert R. Granucci and John F. Kraetzer, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondent.
Martin v. Texas
No. 149. Nos. 345 and 508. Martin v. Texas; McClelland v. Texas. Clyde W. Woody and Marian S. Rosen for petitioner in No. 149. J. Edwin Smith and Byron Skelton for petitioner in Nos. 345 and 508. Samuel H. Robertson, Jr., and Carl E. F. Dal
Gardens of Faith, Inc. v. Commissioner
No. 530. Gardens of Faith, Inc., et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. John Y. Merrell for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Roberts and Melva M. Graney for respondent.
Oling v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n
No. 518. Oling et al. v. Air Line Pilots Association et al. I. J. Gromfine and Herman Sternstein for petitioners. Samuel J. Cohen and Herbert A. Levy for Air Line Pilots Association, and Stuart Bernstein for United Air Lines, Inc., responde
United States v. Catto
No. 535. United States v. Catto et al. Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Jones, Acting Assistant Attorney General Roberts, Jack S. Levin and Melva M. Graney for the United States. Ben F. Foster for Catto et al.,
In re Disbarment of Harris
No. 56, Misc. In re Disbarment of Harris.
Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. United States
FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY CO. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 541. Decided November 22, 1965. A. Alvis Layne and Fred H. Kent for appellant. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert B. Hummel and Robert W. Ginnane
Reynolds Metals Co. v. Washington
REYNOLDS METALS CO. v. WASHINGTON et al. No. 537. Decided November 22, 1965. DeWitt Williams for appellant. John J. O’Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and James A. Furber and Henry W. Wager, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee
United States v. Maryland ex rel. Meyer
UNITED STATES v. MARYLAND FOR THE USE OF MEYER et al. No. 543, October Term, 1963. Certiorari denied December 16, 1963. — Rehearing denied December 7, 1964.- Rehearing and certiorari granted and case decided November 22, 1965. Solicitor Gen
Seaboard Air Line Railroad v. United States
SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILROAD CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 425. Decided November 22, 1965. Paul A. Porter, Dennis G. Lyons, Harold J. Gallagher, Walter H. Brown, Jr., Richard A. Hollander, Edwin H. Burgess, Prime F. Osborn, Albert B.
United Steelworkers of America v. R. H. Bouligny, Inc.
UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO v. R. H. BOULIGNY, INC. No. 19. Argued October 21, 1965. Decided November 22, 1965. Michael H. Gottesman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were David E. Feller, Bernard Kleiman,
United States v. Romano
UNITED STATES v. ROMANO et al. No. 2. Argued October 14, 1965. Decided November 22, 1965. Louis F. Claiborne argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Bea
Swift & Co. v. Wickham
SWIFT & CO., INC., et al. v. WICKHAM, COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE & MARKETS OF NEW YORK. No. 9. Argued October 13, 1965. Decided November 22, 1965. William J. Condon argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were William J. Col
General Auto Supplies, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
November 16, 1965. No. 579. General Auto Supplies, Inc., et al. v. Federal Trade Commission. Bernard Mellitz, Malcolm I. Frank and Telford B. Orbison for petitioners.
Waltham Watch Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
No. 107. No. 174. No. 296. No. 308. No. 41, No. 42, No. 101, No. 109, No. 133, No. 166, No. 170, No. 179, No. 227, No. 314, No. 342, No. 426, No. 431, No. 436, Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Mi
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.