Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1966 Cases
682 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Worthy v. United States
WORTHY v. UNITED STATES. No. 1107, Misc. Decided June 20, 1966. David B. Isbell for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.
Griffin v. Maryland
GRIFFIN v. MARYLAND. No. 289, Misc. Decided June 20, 1966. Petitioner pro se. Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General of Maryland, for respondent.
Miller v. Rhay
MILLER v. RHAY, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT. No. 1180. Decided June 20, 1966. Charles Horowitz, by appointment of the Court, post, p. 902, for petitioner. John J. O’Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Stephen C. Way, Assistant Atto
Wallace v. Virginia
WALLACE et al. v. VIRGINIA. No. 1011. Decided June 20, 1966. George E. Allen, Sr., Anthony G. Amsterdam, Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Charles Stephen Ralston, S. W. Tucker and Henry L. Marsh III for petitioners. Frederick T. Gray fo
Baines v. City of Danville
BAINES et al. v. CITY OF DANVILLE. No. 959. Decided June 20, 1966. Arthur Kinoy, William M. Kunstler and J. L. Williams for petitioners. Rutledge C. Clement for respondent.
New Jersey v. Russo
NEW JERSEY et al. v. RUSSO et al. No. 834. Decided June 20, 1966. Brendan T. Byrne for petitioners. Raymond A. Brown and Irving I. Vogelman for respondent Russo. Respondent Bisignano, pro se. Briefs of amici curiae, in support of the petiti
United States v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
UNITED STATES et al. v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO. et al. No. 576. Decided June 20, 1966. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert B. Hummel, Jerry Z. Pruzansky, Robert W. Ginnane and Arthur J. Cerr
Lomenzo v. WMCA, Inc.
LOMENZO, SECRETARY OF STATE OF NEW YORK, et al. v. WMCA, INC., et al. No. 81. Decided June 20, 1966. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Thomas E. Dewey, Leonard Joseph and Malcolm H. Bell for appellants. Leo A. Larkin, Jack B
Castaldi v. United States
CASTALDI v. UNITED STATES. No. 33. Decided June 20, 1966. Daniel H. Greenberg for petitioner in No. 33. Philip R. Edelbaum for petitioner in No. 218. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Richard W
England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners
ENGLAND et al. v. LOUISIANA STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS et al. No. 1288. Decided June 20, 1966. J. Minos Simon and Floyd J. Reed for appellants.
Lucignano v. United States
LUCIGNANO et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 1058. Decided June 20, 1966. Michael A. Querques and Daniel E. Isles for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Marshall Tamor Golding for th
National Dairy Products Corp. v. United States
NATIONAL DAIRY PRODUCTS CORP. v. UNITED STATES. No. 758. Decided June 20, 1966. John T. Chadwell, Richard W. McLaren and Martin J. Purcell for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro and
Leon v. United States
LEON v. UNITED STATES. No. 573. Decided June 20, 1966. Edward L. Carey and Walter E. Gillcrist for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Dennis v. United States
DENNIS et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 502. Argued April 20, 1966. Decided June 20, 1966. Telford Taylor argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Nathan Witt and George J. Francis. Nathan Lewin argued the cause for the Uni
City of Greenwood v. Peacock
CITY OF GREENWOOD v. PEACOCK et al. No. 471. Argued April 26, 1966. Decided June 20, 1966. Hardy Lott argued the cause for petitioner in No. 471 and for respondent in No. 649. With him on the briefs was Aubrey H. Bell. Benjamin E. Smith arg
Georgia v. Rachel
GEORGIA v. RACHEL et al. No. 147. Argued April 25-26, 1966. Decided June 20, 1966. George K. McPherson, Jr., and J. Robert Sparks, Assistant Solicitors General of Georgia, argued the cause for petitioner. With them on the brief were Arthur
Schmerber v. California
SCHMERBER v. CALIFORNIA. No. 658. Argued April 25, 1966. Decided June 20, 1966. Thomas M. McGurrin argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Edward L. Davenport argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Roger Amebergh and
Davis v. North Carolina
DAVIS v. NORTH CAROLINA. No. 815. Argued April 28, 1966. Decided June 20, 1966. Charles V. Bell argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Walter B. Nivens and Calvin Brown. James F. Bullock, Assistant Attorney General of N
Johnson v. New Jersey
JOHNSON et al. v. NEW JERSEY. No. 762. Argued February 28, March 1-2, 1966. Decided June 20, 1966. Stanford, Shmukler and M. Gene Haeberle argued the cause for petitioners. With them on the briefs was Curtis R. Reitz. Norman Heine argued th
Howard v. Kentucky
June 14, 1966. No. 921. Howard v. Kentucky. John Y. Brown for petitioner. Robert Matthews, Attorney General of Kentucky, and Charles W. Runyan, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Hightower v. United States
No. 1628, Misc. Hightower v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
Iles v. Kentucky
No. 1579, Misc. Iles v. Kentucky.
Clonce v. United States
No. 1444, Misc. Clonce v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg■ and Donald I. Bierman for the United States.
Vida v. Armstrong
No. 1272, Misc. Vida v. Armstrong, Judge, et al.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.