Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1966 Cases
682 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Leslie v. California
No. 1131, Misc. Leslie v. California. Petitioner pro se. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, Bradley A. Stoutt, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
Joyce v. United States
No. 1268. Joyce v. United States. John J. Gibbons for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Mervyn Hamburg for the United States.
McGuire v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.
No. 1265. McGuire et al. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co. Samuel J. Cohen for petitioners. John H. Morse for respondent.
Grossman v. Pearlman
No. 1250. Grossman et vir v. Pearlman et al.
Dunning v. United States
No. 1138. Dunning et ux. v. United States. Albert F. Hillix and Richard H. Brown for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin and Lee A. Jackson for the United States.
Gilbert v. California
No. 1600, Misc. Gilbert v. California.
Schack v. Bogart
No. 904, Misc. Schack v. Bogart, Clerk, et al.
Black v. United States
No. 1029. Black v. United States. Memorandum for the United States filed by Solicitor General Marshall.
Great Lakes Pipe Line Co. v. Commissioner of Taxation
GREAT LAKES PIPE LINE CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION. No. 1240. Decided June 13, 1966. Hayner N. Larson, Erwin A. Goldstein and Leon B. Seek for appellant. Robert W. Mattson, Attorney General of Minnesota, Perry Voidness, Deputy Attorney G
Gojack v. United States
GOJACK v. UNITED STATES. No. 594. Argued April 21, 1966. Decided June 13, 1966. Frank J. Dormer argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Edward J. Ennis, Osmond K. Fraenkel, Melvin L. Wulf and David Rein. Assistant Attorn
Nicholas v. United States
NICHOLAS, TRUSTEE v. UNITED STATES. No. 650. Argued April 19, 1966. Decided June 13, 1966. John H. Gunn argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner. C. Moxley Featherston argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solici
Cardona v. Power
CARDONA v. POWER et al. No. 673. Argued April 18, 1966. Decided June 13, 1966. Paul O’Dwyer argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was W. Bernard Richland. Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General of New York, a
Katzenbach v. Morgan
KATZENBACH, ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al. v. MORGAN et ux. No. 847. Argued April 18, 1966. Decided June 13, 1966. Solicitor General Marshall argued the cause for appellants in No. 847. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Doar,
Federal Trade Commission v. Dean Foods Co.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. DEAN FOODS CO. et al. No. 970. Argued March 28, 1966. Decided June 13, 1966. Solicitor General Marshall argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Turner, Richard A. Po
United States v. Grinnell Corp.
UNITED STATES v. GRINNELL CORP. et al. No. 73. Argued March 28-29, 1966. Decided June 13, 1966. Daniel M. Friedman argued the cause for the United States in all cases. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorne
United States v. Pabst Brewing Co.
UNITED STATES v. PABST BREWING CO. et al. No. 404. Argued April 27, 1966. Decided June 13, 1966. Edwin M. Zimmerman argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General T
Miranda v. Arizona
MIRANDA v. ARIZONA. No. 759. Argued February 28-March 1, 1966. Decided June 13, 1966 John J. Flynn argued the cause for petitioner in No. 759. With him on the brief was John P. Frank. Victor M. Earle III argued the cause and filed a brief f
Zizzo v. United States
No. 834, October Term, 1964. Zizzo et al. v. United States,
Florida ex rel. Worthington v. Cannon
No. 1551, Misc. Florida ex rel. Worthington v. Cannon, Judge. Hilton R. Carr, Jr., and Herbert A. Warren, Jr., for petitioner.
Miller v. Sigler
No. 1532, Misc. Miller v. Sigler, Warden.
Ruby v. Secretary of the United States Navy
No. 1504, Misc. Ruby v. Secretary of the United States Navy. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for respondent.
Ames v. Myers
No. 1480, Misc. Ames v. Myers, Correctional Superintendent.
Ortega v. Cox
No. 1442, Misc. Ortega v. Cox, Warden.
Charlton v. Cox
No. 1405, Misc. Charlton v. Cox, Warden.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.