Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1966 Cases
682 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States v. Standard Oil Co.
UNITED STATES v. STANDARD OIL CO. No. 291. Argued January 25, 1966. Decided May 23, 1966. Nathan Lewin argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beat
Mills v. Alabama
MILLS v. ALABAMA. No. 597. Argued April 19, 1966. Decided May 23, 1966. Kenneth Perrine and Alfred Swedlaw argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant. Leslie Hall, Assistant Attorney General of Alabama, and Burgin Hatokins argued the
Mattel, Inc. v. Louis Marx & Co.
May 18, 1966. No. 1094. Mattel, Inc. v. Louis Marx & Co., Inc. Louis Nizer for petitioner. Harold I. Kaplan for respondent.
Kelly v. United States
No. 730, Misc. Kelly v. United States. Edward Bennett Williams and Harold Ungar for petitioner. Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.
Armstrong v. United States
No. 1377, Misc. Armstrong v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
Crooks v. American Mutual Liability Insurance
No. 1066, Misc. Crooks v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co. et al. Petitioner pro se. John L. Pitts for respondents.
Stahlman v. Rhay
No. 705, Misc. Stahlman v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent. Petitioner pro se. John J. O’Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Stephen C. Way and Paul J. Murphy, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
Brown & Root, Inc. v. American Home Assurance Co.
No. 1193. Brown & Root, Inc. v. American Home Assurance Co. Robert Eikel for petitioner. Carl G. Stearns for respondent.
Smith v. United States
No. 1163. Smith v. United States. John N. Crudup for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Donald I. Bierman for the United States.
Schmeusser v. Katzenbach
No. 1148. Schmeusser v. Katzenbach, Attorney General, et al. Leslie L. Conner and James M. Little for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall for respondents.
Euclid-Tennessee, Inc. v. Commissioner
No. 1060. Euclid-Tennessee, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. William Waller for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin and Harry Baum for respondent.
Benrus Watch Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
No. 1080. No. 1081. Benrus Watch Co., Inc., et al. v. Federal Trade Commission; and Seigmeister v. Federal Trade Commission. Harry I. Rand for petitioners in No. 1080. Harold W. Wolfram for petitioner in No. 1081. Solicitor General Marshall
Pierson v. Ray
No. 1074. No. 1155. Pierson et al. v. Ray et al.; and Ray et al. v. Pierson et al. Carl Rachlin and Melvin Wulf for petitioners in No. 1074. Thomas H. Watkins for petitioners in No. 1155 and for respondents in No. 1074.
Senfour Investment Co. v. King County
No. 1141. Senfour Investment Co., Inc. v. King County.
United States v. Louisiana
May 16, 1966. No. 9, Original. United States v. Louisiana et al. Solicitor General Marshall, Archibald Cox, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, Louis F. Claiborne and George S. Swarth for the United States. Jack P. F. Gremillion, Att
Illinois ex rel. Musso v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
ILLINOIS ex rel. MUSSO, MADISON COUNTY TREASURER v. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILROAD CO. et al. No. 1046. Decided May 16, 1966. Burton C. Bernard for appellant. Hugh J. Dobbs, John F. Schlafly, Louis F. Gillespie, Gordon Burroughs, Eld
United States v. Fisher
UNITED STATES v. FISHER. No. 700. Decided May 16, 1966. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Ronald L. Gainer for the United States. Joseph H. Stamler for appellee.
Hanson v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
HANSON et al. v. CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY. No. 1170. Decided May 16, 1966. Robert O. Ellis, Jr., for petitioners. William, C. Beatty and Amos A. Bolen for respondent.
Toombs v. Fortson
TOOMBS et al. v. FORTSON, SECRETARY OF STATE OF GEORGIA, et al. No. 1205. Decided May 16, 1966. Francis Shackelford, Edward S. White, Emmet J. Bondumnt II, Israel Katz and Hamilton Lokey for appellants. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General of
Simmons v. Seelatsee
SIMMONS et al. v. SEELATSEE, CHAIRMAN OF THE YAKIMA TRIBAL COUNCIL, et al. No. 1112. Decided May 16, 1966. L. Frederick Paul for appellants. James B. Hovis for appellees Seelatsee et al. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney Genera
Barrios v. Florida
BARRIOS et al. v. FLORIDA. No. 722. Decided May 16, 1966. Leonard B. Boudin, Victor Rabinowitz, Tobias Simon and Michael B. Standard for appellants. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and Edward D. Coioart, Assistant Attorney Gene
Pure Oil Co. v. Suarez
PURE OIL CO. v. SUAREZ. No. 692. Argued April 19, 1966. Decided May 16, 1966. Eberhard P. Deutsch argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was René H. Himel, Jr. Arthur Roth argued the cause for respondent. With him on the br
Ashton v. Kentucky
ASHTON v. KENTUCKY. No. 619. Argued April 28, 1966. Decided May 16, 1966. Ephraim London argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Dan Jack Combs and Melvin L. Wulf. John B. Browning, Assistant Attorney General of Kentucky
Securities & Exchange Commission v. New England Electric System
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. NEW ENGLAND ELECTRIC SYSTEM et al. No. 636. Argued March 23, 1966. Decided May 16, 1966. Philip A. Loomis, Jr., argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Marshall, Da
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.