Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1966 Cases
682 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Amell v. United States
AMELL et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 282. Argued January 24, 1966. Decided May 16, 1966. David Scribner argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Lee Pressman and Joan Stern Kiok. John C. Eldridge argued the cause for the U
Patterson v. Florida
May 6, 1966. No. 1569, Misc. Patterson v. Florida.
O'Connor v. United States
No. 1253, Misc. O’Connor v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
Mattel, Inc. v. Duncan
No. 1145. Mattel, Inc. v. Duncan et al. Albert M. Herzig for petitioner. Collins Mason for respondents.
Lance v. Plummer
No. 1096. Lance v. Plummer et al. Chester Bedell and Hamilton D. Upchurch for petitioner. Jack Greenberg, Leroy D. Clark and Tobias Simon for respondents.
Richmond v. Weiner
No. 1119. Richmond v. Weiner, Executor. Morris Lavine for petitioner.
Lesser v. Commissioner
No. 1028. Lesser et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. George T. Altman for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Bogovin and Gilbert E. Andrews for respondent.
Lassen v. Arizona ex rel. Arizona Highway Department
No. 1109. Lassen, Commissioner, State Land Department v. Arizona ex rel. Arizona Highway Department. Darrell F. Smith, Attorney General of Arizona, by Dale R. Shum-way, John P. Frank and Dix W. Price, Special Assistant Attorneys General, fo
National Labor Relations Board v. Acme Industrial Co.
No. 876. National Labor Relations Board v. Acme Industrial Co. Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., John Silard and Harriett T. Taylor on the motion.
Illinois v. Missouri
May 2, 1966. No. 18, Original. Illinois v. Missouri. [For earlier orders herein, see 379 U. S. 952; 380 U. S. 901, 969; and 382 U. S. 803, 1022.]
Children of Israel v. Tamarkin
CHILDREN OF ISRAEL et al. v. TAMARKIN et al. No. 1054. Decided May 2, 1966. Martin S. Goldberg for appellants. C. Kenneth Clark for appellees.
Clayton v. United States
CLAYTON, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. UNITED STATES. No. 893. Decided May 2, 1966. Thomas Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, Peyton B. Abbott, Deputy Attorney General, and Charles D. Barham, Jr., Assistant Atto
Texas v. United States
TEXAS v. UNITED STATES. No. 1218. Decided May 2, 1966. Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, Hawthorne Phillips, First Assistant Attorney General, and Mary K. Wall, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant. Solicitor General Marshall f
Baer v. New York
BAER v. NEW YORK. No. 1077. Decided May 2, 1966. Isadore Greenberg for appellant.
Riggan v. Virginia
RIGGAN v. VIRGINIA. No. 887. Decided May 2, 1966. H. Clifford Allder for petitioner. Robert Y. Button, Attorney General of Virginia, and M. Harris Parker, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Westbrook v. Arizona
WESTBROOK v. ARIZONA. No. 1250, Misc. Decided May 2, 1966. W. Edward, Morgan for petitioner. Darrell F. Smith, Attorney General of Arizona, and Paul G. Rosenblatt, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
United States v. General Motors Corp.
UNITED STATES v. GENERAL MOTORS CORP. et al. No. 46. Argued December 9, 1965. Decided April 28, 1966. Daniel M. Friedman argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner
National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Overstreet
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE et al. v. OVERSTREET. No. 505. Argued March 29, 1966. Decided April 27, 1966. Robert L. Carter argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Anne Gross Feldman, Maria
United States v. Catto
UNITED STATES v. CATTO et al. No. 535. Argued March 22-23, 1966. Decided April 26, 1966. Jack S. Levin argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorneys General Feathe
Carter v. California
No. 1350, Misc. Carter v. California et al.
Barrientos v. California
No. 1181, Misc. Barrientos v. California.
Lovell v. Tennessee
No. 1119, Misc. Lovell v. Tennessee. John F. Dugger for petitioner. George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Robert F. Hedgepath, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Anastasiadis v. Little John
No. 467, Misc. Anastasiadis v. The Little John. Arthur J. Mandell for petitioner. Leroy Denman Moody for respondent. Reported below: 346 F. 2d 281; 347 F. 2d 823.
Weinhart v. United States
No. 1123. Weinhart v. United States. Earl T. Prosser for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.