Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1966 Cases
682 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY CO. et al. v. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILROAD CO. et al. No. 751. Decided January 24, 1966. Jordan Jay Hillman, Bryce L. Hamilton and John C. Danielson for appellants in No. 751. Robert W. Ginnane and L
Pew v. Commandant
PEW v. COMMANDANT, U. S. COAST GUARD. No. 824, Misc. Decided January 24, 1966. Appellant pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for appellee.
Banks v. California
BANKS v. CALIFORNIA. No. 87, Misc. Decided January 24, 1966. Petitioner pro se. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and Charles W. Rumph, Deputy Attorney General, for responden
Tehan v. United States ex rel. Shott
TEHAN, SHERIFF v. UNITED STATES ex rel. SHOTT. No. 52. Argued November 18, 1965. Decided January 19, 1966. Calvin W. Prem argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Melvin G. Rueger. Thurman Arnold argued the cause for respo
Giaccio v. Pennsylvania
GIACCIO v. PENNSYLVANIA. No. 47. Argued December 6, 1965. Decided January 19, 1966. Peter Hearn argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were James C. N. Paul and Paul J. Mishkin. John S. Halsted argued the cause for appellee.
Snapp v. Neal
SNAPP v. NEAL, STATE AUDITOR, et al. No. 16. Argued November 15-16, 1965. Decided January 18, 1966. Leon D. Hubert, Jr., argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Carl J. Felth. Martin R. McLendon, Assistant Attorney Gener
California v. Buzard
CALIFORNIA v. BUZARD. No. 40. Argued November 16, 1965. Decided January 18, 1966. Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General of California, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs were Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, and
Segal v. Rochelle
SEGAL, dba SEGAL COTTON PRODUCTS, et al. v. ROCHELLE, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY. No. 44. Argued November 17, 1965. Decided January 18, 1966. Henry Klepak argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioners. William J. Rochelle, Jr., argued the c
Harvey v. Lyons
No. 513. Harvey v. Lyons et al.,
Rosenblatt v. American Cyanamid Co.
No. 501. Rosenblatt v. American Cyanamid Co.,
Viking Theatre Corp. v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp.
No. 481, October Term, 1963. Viking Theatre Corp. v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp. et al.,
Losinger v. Michigan
No. 926, Misc. Losinger v. Michigan.
Chapman v. Russell
No. 845, Misc. Chapman v. Russell, Correctional Superintendent.
Russell v. Maxwell
No. 808, Misc. Russell v. Maxwell, Warden.
Rector v. Heinze
No. 797, Misc. Rector v. Heinze, Warden.
Vida v. Roth
No. 772, Misc. Vida v. Roth, U. S. District Judge. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for respondent.
Ward v. Peyton
No. 755, Misc. Ward v. Peyton, Penitentiary Superintendent.
Butler v. Weakley
No. 694, Misc. Butler v. Weakley et al. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Doar and David L. Norman for respondents.
Reed v. United States
No. 509, Misc. Reed v. United States et al.
Wilson v. Maroney
No. 478, Misc. Wilson v. Maroney, Correctional Superintendent. Petitioner pro se. William A. Peiffer for respondent.
Armstrong v. Alabama
No. 295, Misc. Armstrong v. Alabama. Petitioner pro se. Richmond M. Flowers, Attorney General of Alabama, and Leslie Hall and W. Mark Anderson III, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
Sullivan v. New Jersey
No. 212, Misc. Sullivan v. New Jersey. Petitioner pro se. Leo Kap-lowitz and Ralph de Vita for respondent.
Gray v. California
No. 741. Gray et al. v. California. David Arthur Binder for petitioners. Roger Arnebergh and Philip E. Grey for respondent.
Overlakes Corp. v. Commissioner
No. 682. Overlakes Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Mr. Justice Brennan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. William, L. Hanaway and Thomas R. Moore for petitioner. Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Act
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.