Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1966 Cases
682 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Hoffa v. United States
No. 794. No. 795. No. 796. No. 797. Hoffa v. United States; Parks v. United States; Campbell v. United States; and King v. United States. Morris A. Shenker and Joseph A. Fanelli for petitioner in No. 794. Jacques M. Schiffer for petitioner
Adderley v. Florida
No. 506. Adderley et al. v. Florida. Richard Yale Feder and Tobias Simon for petitioners. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and William D. Roth, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Illinois v. Missouri
January 31, 1966. No. 18, Original. Illinois v. Missouri. William O. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, Richard A. Michael, Assistant Attorney General, and Terence F. MacCarthy, Special Assistant Attorney General, for plaintiff. [For earl
Platt v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
PLATT, CHIEF JUDGE, U. S. DISTRICT COURT v. MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO. No. 274. Decided January 31, 1966. Solicitor General Marshall, former Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Wright and Lionel Kestenbaum for
Rainsberger v. Nevada
RAINSBERGER v. NEVADA. No. 368, Misc. Decided January 31, 1966. Samuel S. Lionel for appellant. Paul C. Parraguirre for appellee.
United States v. Wilson & Co.
UNITED STATES et al. v. WILSON & CO., INC., et al. No. 56. Decided January 31, 1966. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States et al. Howard J. Trienens for respondents American Telephone & Telegraph Có. et al.
United States v. California
UNITED STATES v. CALIFORNIA. No. 5, Original. Decided June 23, 1947, and May 17, 1965. — Order and Decree Entered October 27, 1947. Supplemental Decree Entered January 31, 1966. Solicitor General Marshall, Louis F. Claiborne and George S. S
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad
BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS et al. v. CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND & PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. et al. No. 69. Argued December 8-9, 1965. Decided January 31, 1966. James E. Youngdahl argued the cause for appellants in No. 69. With him on the brie
Taylor v. Walker
No. 988, Misc. Taylor v. Walker, Warden.
Hollis v. Beto
No. 954, Misc. Hollis v. Beto, Corrections Director.
Mundt v. Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
No. 944, Misc. Mundt et al. v. Home Federal Savings & Loan Association et al.
Trest v. United States
No. 885, Misc. Trest v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.
Robbins v. California
No. 819, Misc. Robbins v. California.
Nichols v. Randolph
No. 688, Misc. Nichols v. Randolph, Warden. Petitioner pro se. William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and Richard A. Michael and Philip J. Rock, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
Gardner v. United States
No. 514, Misc. Gardner v. United States. Charles L. Decker for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Sidney M. Gla-zer for the United States.
Melton v. Colorado
No. 396, Misc. Melton v. Colorado. Petitioner pro se. Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, and John P. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Quintana v. Colorado
No. 788. Quintana v. Colorado. Edward S. Barlock for petitioner. Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, and John E. Bush, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Estate of Geiger v. Commissioner
No. 813. Estate of Geiger et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Phillip Steve Dandos and James M. McNally for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Roberts and Harold C. Wilkenfeld for respondent.
Halko v. Anderson
No. 785. Halko v. Anderson. Joseph Nissley for petitioner.
Natural Resources, Inc. v. Wineberg
No. 778. Natural Resources, Inc., et al. v. Wineberg. James C. Dezendorf for petitioners.
Portelli v. New York
No. 269. No. 270. Portelli v. New York; and Rosenberg v. New York. William Sonenshine for-.petitioner in No. 269. Maurice Edelbaum for petitioner in No. 270. Aaron E. Koota and Aaron Nussbaum for respondent in both cases.
Cardona v. Power
No. 673. Cardona v. Power et al. Paul O’Dwyer and W. Bernard Richland for appellant. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowits, First Assistant Attorney General, George C. Mantzoros and Barry J. Lipson, Assistan
Garvey v. Eyman
No. 77, Misc. Garvey v. Eyman, Warden. Petitioner pro se. Darrell F. Smith, Attorney General of Arizona, for respondent.
Green v. Public Utilities Commission
January 24, 1966. No. 945, Misc. Green, dba Jim Green's Trucking Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of California. Thomas S. Tobin for petitioner. Mary Moran Pajalich for respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.