Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1967 Cases
756 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Stewart v. Industrial Commission of Illinois
STEWART et al. v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ILLINOIS et al. No. 1034. Decided April 17, 1967. Bernard Kleiman, Gilbert A. Cornfield, Gilbert Feld-man, Jason Gesmer and Alton Sharpe for appellants. Harlan L. Hackbert for appellees.
Laverne v. Incorporated Village of Laurel Hollow
LAVERNE et al. v. INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF LAUREL HOLLOW et al. No. 984. Decided April 17, 1967. Monroe H. Freedman for appellants.
Thorpe v. Housing Authority of Durham
THORPE v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF DURHAM. No. 712. Argued March 21, 1967. Decided April 17, 1967. James M. Nabrit III argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Jack Greenberg, Charles Stephen -Ralston,■ Charles H
Houston Insulation Contractors Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board
HOUSTON INSULATION CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD. No. 206. Argued January 19, 1967. Decided April 17, 1967. W. D. Deakins, Jr., argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner in No. 206 and for respondent in No
National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board
NATIONAL WOODWORK MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION et al. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD. No. 110. Argued January 18 and 19, 1967. Decided April 17, 1967. Charles B. Mahin argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioners in No. 110 and for res
Specht v. Patterson
SPECHT v. PATTERSON, WARDEN, et al. No. 831. Argued March 21, 1967. Decided April 11, 1967. Michael A. Williams, by appointment of the Court, 385 U. S. 997, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Hugh A. Burns. John E. B
Federal Trade Commission v. Procter & Gamble Co.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. PROCTER & GAMBLE CO. No. 342. Argued February 13, 1967. Decided April 11, 1967. Solicitor General Marshall argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Assistant Attorney General Turner, Richard A
Pierson v. Ray
PIERSON et al. v. RAY et al. No. 79. Argued January 11, 1967. Decided April 11, 1967. Carl Rachlin argued the cause for petitioners in No. 79 and for respondents in No. 94. With him on the briefs was Melvin L. Wulf. Elizabeth Watkins Rulen
Lan Jing-Chau v. Andersen
No. 934. No. 945. No. 948. No. 960. No. 973. No. 992. No. 15, No. 684, No. 1176, No. 1180, No. 1231, Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Lan Jing-Chau et al. v. A. O. Andersen & Co. et al., Hickey et al. v. Illinois Central Railroad Co., Duke v.
In re Disbarment of Rhodes
No. 1312, Misc. In re Disbarment of Rhodes.
Best v. Fay
No. 1293, Mise. Best v. Fay, Warden. Anthony F. Marra for petitioner.
O'Day v. United States
No. 1261, Mise. O’Day v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Pritchett v. Florida
No. 538, Mise. Pritchett v. Florida. Petitioner pro se. Earl Fair cloth, Attorney General of Florida, and George R. Georgieff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Clifton v. United States
No. 1070, Mise. Clifton v. United States. Donald L. Hardison for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Mervyn Hamburg for the Uftited States.
Woods v. Georgia
No. 790, Mise. Woods v. Georgia. Charles Morgan, Jr., for petitioner. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General of Georgia, G. Ernest Tidwell, Executive Assistant Attorney General, and A. Joseph Nardone, Jr., Deputy Assistant Attorney General, for
Lee v. City of Jesup
No. 1079. Lee et al. v. City of Jesup. Aaron Kravitch for petitioners..
Stickler v. Tehan
No. 1075. Stickler v. Tehan, Sheriff. Bernard A. Berkman, Larry S. Gordon and Joshua J. Kancelbaum for petitioner. Melvin G. Rueger and Fred J. Gartolano for respondent.
Bennett v. Labat
No. 956. Bennett, Acting Warden v. Labat et al. Jack P, F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, William P. Schuler, Second Assistant Attorney General, and John E. Jackson, Jr., and Dorothy D. Wolbrette, Assistant Attorneys General, fo
Brenner v. Hofstetter
No. 1002. Brenner, Commissioner of Patents v. Hofstetter. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Sanders and Morton Hollander for petitioner. Paul N. Kokulis and Lawrence A. Hymo for respondent.
United States v. Sealy, Inc.
No. 9. United States v. Sealy, Inc. Sigmund Timberg on the motion.
Cross v. California
CROSS v. CALIFORNIA. No. 1295, Mise. Decided April 10, 1967.
D'Amico v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
D’AMICO v. BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD CO. No. 1028. Decided April 10, 1967. Appellant pro se. Sydney R. Prince, Jr., for appellee.
Nowakowski v. Maroney
NOWAKOWSKI v. MARONEY, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT. No. 222. Argued March 13, 1967. Decided April 10, 1967. Daniel J. O’Hern, by appointment of the Court, 385 U. S. 804, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. William E. Pfadt ar
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Tashire
STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO. et al. v. TASHIRE et al. No. 391. Argued February 14-15, 1967. Decided April 10, 1967. Otto R. Skopil, Jr., and John Gordon Gearin argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioners. Nick Chaivoe and James B. G
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.