Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1967 Cases
756 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Crown Coat Front Co. v. United States
CROWN COAT FRONT CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES. No. 371. Argued February 13-14, 1967. Decided April 10, 1967. Edwin J. McDermott, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. David L. Rose argued the cause for the United States. With him
Honda v. Clark
HONDA et al. v. CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL. No. 164. Argued February 14, 1967. Decided April 10, 1967. Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were John Silard, A. L. Wirin, Fred Okrand and Benjamin V. Coh
Gamez v. Texas
No. 718, No. 1074, No. 1138, No. 1155, Mise. Mise. Mise. Mise. Gamez v. Texas, Soots et ux. v. Attorney General of the United States, Dukes v. United States, Lewis, aka Ehrlich v. Illinois et al.,
Seymour v. United States
No. 1273, Mise. Seymour v. United States. Petitioner pro se: Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Philip R. Monahan for the United States.
Hicks v. Illinois
No. 1252, Mise. Hicks v. Illinois. John R. Snively for petitioner.
Copeland v. Myers
No. 960, Mise. Copeland v. Myers, Correctional Superintendent. Petitioner pro se. Arlen Specter for respondent.
Molinas v. Mancusi
No. 1026. Molinas v. Mancusi, Warden. Thomas R. Newman for petitioner.
Christofalos v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
No. 1054. Christofalos v. Immigration and Naturalization Service. Nathan T. Nothin for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Bea-/ trice Rosenberg for respondent.
Ostendorff v. United States
No. 1043. Ostendorff v. United States. Ernest J. Howard for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin,and Joseph M. Howard for the United States.
CBN Corp. v. States
No. 954. CBN Corp., formerly Columbian Carbon Co. v. United States. Robert J. Casey for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin and Grant W. Wiprud for the United States.
Berger v. New York
March 27, 1967. No. 615. Berger v. New York. John J. McAvoy on the motion.
Connor v. Johnson
CONNOR et al. v. JOHNSON, GOVERNOR OF MISSISSIPPI, et al. No. 999. Decided March 27, 1967. Carl Bachlin, Marvin M. Karpatkin, Arthur Kinoy, Melvin L. Wulf, Alvin J. Bronstein and Robert B. McKay for appellants. Joe T. Patterson, Attorney Ge
Cross v. Palo Alto-Mountain View Municipal Court
CROSS et al. v. PALO ALTO-MOUNTAIN VIEW MUNICIPAL COURT et al. No. 1246, Mise. Decided March 27, 1967. Appellants pro se. Hugh Stewart Center for appellees Ebnother et al.
Berman v. Board of Elections
BERMAN v. BOARD OF ELECTIONS, CITY OF NEW YORK, et al. No. 1019. Decided March 27, 1967. Appellant pro se. J. Lee Rankin for appellees. Mason Hampton, Jr., for the National Information Bureau for Jewish Life, Inc., as amicus curiae, in supp
Colonial Refrigerated Transportation, Inc. v. United States
COLONIAL REFRIGERATED TRANSPORTATION, INC. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 894. Decided March 27, 1967. S. Eason Batch, for appellant. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Nahum
Bostick v. South Carolina
BOSTICK v. SOUTH CAROLINA et al. No. 647. Argued March 20, 1967. Decided March 27, 1967. Matthew J. Perry argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Charles E. Washington, Jr. Everett N. Brandon, Assistant Attorney General o
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United States
BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 642. Argued January 9-10, 1967. Decided March 27, 1967. Howard J. Trienens, Lloyd N. Cutler, Edward W. Bourne, Harry G. Silleck, Jr., Leon H. Keyserling and Gordon P. MacDouga
United States v. First City National Bank of Houston
UNITED STATES v. FIRST CITY NATIONAL BANK OF HOUSTON et al. No. 914. Argued February 20-21, 1967. Decided March 27, 1967. Assistant Attorney General Turner argued the cause for the United States in both cases. With him on the brief were Sol
Railroad Transfer Service, Inc. v. City of Chicago
RAILROAD TRANSFER SERVICE, INC. v. CITY OF CHICAGO et al. No. 209. Argued February 13, 1967. Decided March 27, 1967. Amos M. Mathews argued the cause for petitioner. With him or the briefs was David Axelrod. Raymond F. Simon argued the caus
United States v. Louisiana
No. 9, Orig. United States v. Louisiana et al. Solicitor General Marshall, Louis F. Claiborne, Roger P. Marquis and George S. Swarth for the United States. [For earlier actions, see, e. g., 364 U» S 502,3S2 U. S. 288.]
Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
No. 703. No. 793. No. 862. No. 870. No. 871. No. 890, No. 1037, No. 1046, No. 1093, No. 1110, No. 1116, Fred Meyer, Inc., et al. v. Federal Trade Commission, Fein v. New York, Magnus v. United States, Curtis et al. v. Boeger, Warden, Grand
Sturm v. California Adult Authority
No. 1235, Mise. Sturm v. California Adult Authority et al.
Harden v. New York
No. 915, Mise. Harden v. New York.
Sterling v. United States
No. 763, Mise. Sterling v. United States. Leon B. Polsky for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Anthony P. Nugent, Jr., for the United States.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.