Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1967 Cases
756 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Cascade Natural Gas Corp. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.
CASCADE NATURAL GAS CORP. v. EL PASO NATURAL GAS CO. et al. No. 4. Argued January 12, 1967. Decided February 27, 1967. Richard B. Hooper argued the cause for appellant in No. 4. With him on the brief were H. B. Jones, Jr., and Wilbert Carl
Lewis v. United States
No. 36. No. 53. No. 758. No. 761. No. 803. No. 830. No. 841. No. 645, No. 705, No. 767, No. 982, Lewis v. United States, National Labor Relations Board v. C & C Plywood Corp., Nehring v. City of DeKalb et al., Littell v. Udall, Secretary of
Lewis v. Illinois
No. 1155, Misc. Lewis, aka Ehrlich v. Illinois et al.
Pelletier v. Parker
No. 1143, Misc. Pelletier v. Parker, Warden. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Mervyn-Hamburg for respondent.
Esteban v. Chappell
No. 1085, Misc. Esteban v. Chappell, Chairman, U. S. Board of Parole. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for respondent.
Graves v. Wainwright
No. 854, Misc. Graves v. Wainwright. Petitioner pro se. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and Stanley D. Kupiszeioski, Jr., Assistant. Attorney General, for respondent.
Hickey v. Illinois Central Railroad
No. 945. Hickey et al. v. Illinois Central Railroad Leonard R. Hartenfeld for petitioners. Thomas M. Thomas, Robert Mitten and William M. Rice for respondent.
Mitsubishi International Corp. v. Andersen
No. 927. No. 933. No. 934. Mitsubishi International Corp. et al. v. A. O. Andersen & Co. et al.; China Union Lines, Ltd. v. A. O. Andersen & Co. et al.; and Lan Jing-Chau et al. v. A. O. Andersen & Co. et al. Sweeney J. Doehnng for Mitsubis
Patterson v. United States
No. 819. Patterson v. United States. Frank B. Stow for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co. v. Hoisting & Portable Engineers Local Union No. 701
No. 891. Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co. et al. v. Hoisting & Portable Engineers Local Union No. 701 et al.
Kimbro v. Heer
KIMBRO v. HEER, WARDEN. No. 751, Mise. Decided February 20, 1967. Petitioner pro se. George F. McCanless., Attorney General of Tennessee, and Henry C. Fdutch and Paul E. Jennings, Assistant Attorneys General, for. respondent.
MacDonald v. California
MacDONALD v. CALIFORNIA. No. 503, Mise. Decided February 20, 1967. Vasken Minasian for appellant.
Kilgarlin v. Hill
KILGARLIN et al. v. HILL, SECRETARY OF STATE OF TEXAS, et al. No. 235. Decided February 20, 1967. William E. Wright for appellants. Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, Hawthorne Phillips, First Assistant Attorney General, and Mary K.
Giles v. Maryland
GILES et al. v. MARYLAND. No. 27. Argued October 12, 1966. Decided February 20, 1967. Joseph Forer argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs was Hal Witt. Donald Needle, Assistant Attorney General of Maryland, and Robert C. M
Cooper v. California
COOPER v. CALIFORNIA. No. 103. Argued December 8, 1966. Decided February 20, 1967. Michael Traynor, by appointment of the Court, 384 U. S. 948, argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner. Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney Gene
Chapman v. California
CHAPMAN et al. v. CALIFORNIA. No. 95. Argued December 7-8, 1966. Decided February 20, 1967. Morris Lavine argued the cause and filed briefs for' petitioners. Arlo E. Smith, Chief Assistant Attorney General of California, argued the cause fo
Soape v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.
No. 622. Soape et ux. v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. et al.,
Booker v. Illinois
No. 109, Misc. Booker v. Illinois. Richard F. Watt for petitioner. William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and Richard A. Michael, Assistant .Attorney General, for respondent. Reported below: 34 Ill. 2d 16, 213 N. E. 2d 542.
Howard v. Texas
No. 6. Howard v. Texas. Petitioner pro se. Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, Hawthorne Phillips, First Assistant Attorney General, T. B. Wright, Executive Assistant Attorney General, and Howard M. Fender, Gilbert J. Pena and Charles
Warden v. Beto
No. 17, Misc. Warden v. Beto, Corrections Director. Petitioner pro se. Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, Hav)thorne Phillips, First Assistant Attorney General, T. B. Wright, Executive Assistant Attorney General, and Howard M. Fender
Goodspeed v. Beto
No. 2, Misc. Goodspeed v. Beto, Corrections Director. Petitioner pro se. Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, Hawthorne Phillips, Eirst Assistant Attorney General, T. B. Wright, Executive Assistant Attorney General, and Howard M. Fende
Gatewood v. Hendrick
No. 1113, Misc. Gatewood v. Hendrick, County Prisons Superintendent.
Ford v. Wilson
No. 1083, Misc. Ford v. Wilson, Warden.
Banks v. California
No. 1054, Misc. Banks v. California.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.