Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1967 Cases
756 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Hanshaw v. Eyman
No. 1038, Misc. Hanshaw v. Eyman, Warden, et al.
Smith v. Oliver
No. 1008, Misc. Smith v. Oliver, Warden, et al.
Vanella v. United States
No. 979, Misc. Vanella v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
Bennett v. United States
No. 945, Misc. Bennett v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Candelario v. California
No. 704, Misc. Candelario v. California. Petitioner pro se. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Edsel W. Haws and Roger E. Venturi, Deputy Attorneys General, and Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Jones v. Comstock
No. 364, Misc. Jones v. Comstock, Superintendent, et al. Petitioner pro se. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, and Daniel J. Kremer, Deputy Attorney General, for respondents.
Otten v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
No. 921. Otten v. Immigration and Naturalization Service. H. Gordon Davis for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for respondent.
Lafargue v. Samuel
No. 939. Lafargue et vir v. Samuel et al. John D. Lambert, Jr., for petitioners. Thomas L. Stennis II for respondents.
Matanuska Valley Lines, Inc. v. Molitor
No. 922. Matanuska Valley Lines, Inc. v. Molitor. Edgar Paul Boyko for petitioner.
Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. Guarantee Reserve Life Insurance Co.
No. 908. Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. Guarantee Reserve Life Insurance Co. of Hammond et al. William T. Kirby for petitioner. Claude A. Roth for respondents.
Yates v. Hodges
No. 898. Yates et al. v. Hodges et ux. Malcolm B. Montgomery for petitioners. W. H. Jolly for respondents.
Marshall v. Russell
No. 874. Marshall v. Russell, Executrix, et al. G. Hughel Harrison and Thomas M„. Odom for petitioner.
Kennedy v. Powell
No. 880. Kennedy, Treasurer of Arizona, et al. v. Powell, Trustee in Bankruptcy. Darrell F. Smith, Attorney General of Arizona, and John V. Riggs, Assistant Attorney General, for. petitioners Kennedy et al. Louise C. W. Powell, respondent,
Russo v. Virginia
No. 844. Russo v. Virginia. Stuart A. Barbour, Jr., for petitioner.
Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
No. 703. Fred Meyer, Inc., et al. v. Federal Trade Commission. Edward F. Howrey, Terrence C. Sheehy and George W. Mead for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner and James Mel. Henderson for respondent.
Mempa v. Rhay
No. 424. Mempa v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent. Donald A., Schmechel for petitioner. John J. O’Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Stephen C. Way, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
United States v. Penn-Olin Chemical Co.
No. 760. United States v. Penn-Olin Chemical Co. et al. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner and Edwin M. Zimmerman for the-United States. William S. Potter, Albert R. Connelly and H. Francis DeLone for appellees.
In re Disbarment of Rekeweg
No. 1346, Misc. In re Disbarment of Rekeweg.
Schack v. Florida
No. 851, Misc. Schack v. Florida et al. Petitioner pro se. Earl Fair doth, Attorney General of Florida, and George R. Georgieff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.
National Labor Relations Board v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.
No. 216. National Labor Relations Board v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co. et al. Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., John Silard and Stephen I. Schlossberg on the motion.
Illinois v. Missouri
No. 18, Original. Illinois v. Missouri.
Kaye v. Co-Ordinating Committee on Discipline of the Ass'n of the Bar
KAYE v. CO-ORDINATING COMMITTEE ON DISCIPLINE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK. No. 300. Decided February 13, 1967. Morton Lif tin for petitioner. Angelo T. Cometa for respondent.
Barlow v. Texas
BARLOW v. TEXAS. No. 109. Decided February 13, 1967. Alto B. Cervin for appellant. Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, Hawthorne Phillips, First Assistant Attorney General, T. B. Wright, Executive Assistant Attorney General, and Howar
Zuckerman v. Greason
ZUCKERMAN et al. v. GREASON. No. 71. Decided February 13, 1967. Leonard Feldman for petitioners. Samuel Greason, respondent, pro se.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.