Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1967 Cases
756 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Whitus v. Georgia
WHITUS et al. v. GEORGIA. No. 650. Argued December 7, 1966. Decided January 23, 1967. Charles Morgan, Jr., and P. Walter Jones argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioners in both cases. Fred B. Hand, Jr., Solicitor General of Georgia,
Sims v. Georgia
SIMS v. GEORGIA. No. 251. Argued December 6-7, 1966. Decided January 23, 1967. Jack Greenberg argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were James M. Nabrit III, Anthony G. Amsterdam and Howard Moore, Jr. Dewey Hayes, Solicitor
Sitton v. American Title Co.
No. 502. Sitton et ux. v. American Title Co. of Dallas et al.,
Peace v. New York
No. 930, Mise. Peace et al. v. New York. Leon B. Polsky for petitioners. Aaron E. Koota for respondent.
Fields v. New York
No. 970, Mise. Fields v. New York.
Jennings v. United States
No. 908, Mise. Jennings v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
Cachoian v. United States
No. 731, Mise. Cachoian v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Jimenez v. California
No. 611, Mise. Jimenez v. California. Petitioner pro se. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Daniel J. Kremer and Edsel W. Haws, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondent.
Cole v. United States
No. 701. Cole et al. v. United States. R. Eugene Pincham, Charles B. Evins and Sam Adam for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Parker v. Commissioner
No. 812. Parker et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Horace J. Donnelly, Jr., for petitioner Foundation for Divine Meditation, Inc. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin, Lee A. Jackson and Gilbert E. Andrews
Duke Power Co. v. United States
No. 777. Duke Power Co. v. United States. William I. Ward, Jr., for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Roger P. Marquis, Howard 0. Sigmond and Edmund B. Clark for the United States.
Waldron v. Cities Service Co.
No. 744. Waldron, Executrix v. Cities Service Co. Samuel M. Lane for petitioner. Simon H. Rifkind and Edward N. Costikyan for respondent.
Board of Supervisors of Suffolk County v. Bianchi
No. 491. Board of Supervisors of Suffolk County et al. v. Bianchi et al. Richard C. Cahn for appellees Sammis et al. on the motion. Stanley S. Corwin for Board of Supervisors of Suffolk County, and Pierre G. Lundberg for Town of Southampton
Short v. Ness Produce Co.
SHORT et al. v. NESS PRODUCE CO. No. 779. Decided January 16, 1967. Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and Harold E. Burke and Don Parker, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellants. J. Bradley Colburn and Theodore B. Jensen f
Alexander v. Board of Review
ALEXANDER v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY OF NEW JERSEY. No. 892, Misc. Decided January 16, 1967. Appellant pro se. Dominic J. Hart for appellee.
McLeod v. General Electric Co.
McLEOD, REGIONAL DIRECTOR, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. et al. No. 645. Decided January 16, 1967. Solicitor General Marshall, Richard A. Posner, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for petitioner i
Spevack v. Klein
SPEVACK v. KLEIN. No. 62. Argued November 7, 1966. Decided January 16, 1967. Lawrence J. Latt'o argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were William H. Dempsey, Jr., and Martin J. Flynn. Solomon A. Klein, respondent, pro se,
Garrity v. New Jersey
GARRITY et al. v. NEW JERSEY. No. 13. Argued November 10, 1966. Decided January 16, 1967. Daniel L. O’Connor argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief was Eugene Gressman. Alan B. Handler, First Assistant Attorney General of Ne
Pioneer National Title Insurance v. United States
January 11, 1967. No. 402. Pioneer National Title Insurance Co. v. United States et al. Leo F. Tierney, Robert L. Stern and Warren M. Christopher for appellant. Solicitor General Marshall, Donald F. Turner, Robert B. Hummel and Milton J. Gr
Travis v. United States
TRAVIS v. UNITED STATES. No. 67. Argued November 15-16, 1966. Decided January 10, 1967. John T. McTernan argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was A. L. Wirin. Nathan Lewin argued the cause for the United States. With him
United States v. Laub
UNITED STATES v. LAUB et al. No. 176. Argued November 16, 1966. Decided January 10, 1967. Nathan Lewin argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Yeagley, Kevin
Lassen v. Arizona ex rel. Arizona Highway Department
LASSEN, COMMISSIONER, STATE LAND DEPARTMENT v. ARIZONA ex rel. ARIZONA HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT. No. 84. Argued November 16, 1966. Decided January 10, 1967. John P. Frank argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Darrell F. Smi
Layton v. Selb Manufacturing Co.
No. 469. No. 471. No. 486. No. 505. No. 509. No. 524. No. 559. No. 565. No. 800. No. 169, Mise. No. 174, Mise. No. 220, Mise. No. 394, Mise. No. 439, Mise. No. 507, Mise. No. 620, Mise. No. 692, Mise. No. 711, Mise. No. 786, Mise. Layton et
Rodriguez v. Johnston
No. 922, Mise. Rodriguez, aka Giles v. Johnston, State Hospital Superintendent, et al.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.