Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1968 Cases
767 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Odes v. Civil Service Commission of Chicago
No. 696, No. 698, Mise. Mise. Odes v. Civil Service Commission of the City of Chicago et al., Johnson v. California,
Studenroth v. Pennsylvania
No. 843, Mise. Studenroth v. Pennsylvania.
Hollis v. Wisconsin
No. 814, Mise. Hollis v. Wisconsin.
Warner v. New York
No. 690, Mise. Warner v. New York. Peter L. F. Sabbatino for petitioner. William Cahn for respondent.
Sheldon v. Iowa
No. 531, Mise. Sheldon v. Iowa. Richard C. Turner, Attorney General of Iowa, and David A. Elderkin, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Jones v. Schneckloth
No. 258, Mise. Jones v. Schneckloth, Conservation Center Superintendent, et al. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, and Arnold 0. Overoye, Deputy Attorney General, for respondents.
McArthur v. Clifford
No. 613. McArthur et al. v. Clifford, Secretary of Defense, et al. Philip J. Hirschkop for petitioners. Solicitor General Griswold for respondents.
Younger v. Superior Court of California
No. 687. Younger, District Attorney of County of Los Angeles v. Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles (Sirhan, real party in interest). Evelle J. Younger, petitioner, pro se. Joseph A. Ball for respondent.
Continental Nut Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
No. 603. Continental Nut Co. v. National Labor Relations Board. Kenneth C. McGuiness for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, and Norton J. Come for respondent.
Porter v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.
No. 593. Porter, Administratrix v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. Frank E. Everett, Jr., for petitioner. C. R. Bolton, E. D. Grinnell, and W. W. Dalton for respondent.
Williams v. City of Oklahoma City
No. 167, Mise. Williams v. City of Oklahoma City et al. Giles K. Ratcliffe for respondents.
National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co.
No. 573. No. 691. National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co., Inc., et al.; and Food Store Employees Union, Local No. 347, Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America, AFL-CIO v. Gissel Packing Co., Inc. Solicitor
O'Callahan v. Parker
No. 646. O’Callahan v. Parker, Warden. Victor Ra-binowitz on the motion.
Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.
No. 49. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc., et al. [For earlier orders herein, see, e. g., ante, p. 958.]
Great Northern Railway Merger Case
No. -. Great Northern Railway Merger Case. Solicitor General Griswold for the United States, and Robert L. Wald and Joel E. Hoffman for the City of Auburn on the applications. Valentine B. Deale for Livingston Anti-Merger Committee in suppo
Standard Oil Co. of California v. City of Los Angeles
STANDARD OIL CO. OF CALIFORNIA v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al. No. 609. Decided December 16, 1968. Francis R. Kirkham, Francis N. Marshall, and Marcus Mattson for appellant. Roger Arnebergh, Gilmore Tillman, Henry E. Kappler, and Ellis J. Hor
Wilson v. Kelley
WILSON et al. v. KELLEY, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, et al. No. 561. Decided December 16, 1968. Charles Morgan, Jr., Reber F. Boult, Jr., Howard Moore, Jr., P. Walter Jones, Arthur Kinoy, Melvin L. Wulf, and Martin Garbus for appellants. Arthur K
Household Goods Carriers' Bureau v. United States
HOUSEHOLD GOODS CARRIERS' BUREAU et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 615. Decided December 16, 1968. Homer S. Carpenter for appellants. Alan F. Wohlstetter for Household Goods Forwarders Association of America, Inc., et al., intervening defe
Clark v. Gabriel
CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al. v. GABRIEL. No. 572. Decided December 16, 1968. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Morton Hollander, and Robert V. Zener for appellants. Norman Leonard for appellee.
Johnson v. Bennett
JOHNSON v. BENNETT, WARDEN. No. 32. Argued November 13-14, 1968. Decided December 16, 1968. Ronald L. Carlson argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner. William A. Claerhout, Assistant Attorney General of Iowa, argued the cause for r
Oestereich v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 11
OESTEREICH v. SELECTIVE SERVICE SYSTEM LOCAL BOARD NO. 11, CHEYENNE, WYOMING, et al. No. 46. Argued October 24, 1968. Decided December 16, 1968. Melvin L. Wulf argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Alan H. Levine, John
Federal Trade Commission v. Texaco Inc.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. TEXACO INC. et al. No. 24. Argued November 13, 1968. Decided December 16, 1968. Daniel M. Friedman argued the cause for petitioner. On the brief were Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner,
Mengelkoch v. Industrial Welfare Commission
No. 375. Mengelkoch et al. v. Industrial Welfare Commission et al.,
Lingo v. Georgia
No. 725, Mise. Lingo v. Georgia. Charles Morgan, Jr., Reber F. Boult, Albert M. Horn, Melvin L. Wulf, Eleanor Norton, and Martin Garbus for petitioner. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General of Georgia, Marion 0. Gordon, Assistant Attorney Gene
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.