Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1968 Cases
767 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Rao v. United States
No. 319. No. 321. No. 334. No. 343. No. 359. No. 126, No. 172, No. 405, No. 424, Mise. Mise. Mise. Mise. Rao v. United States, Hart v. Hedrick, Trustee in Bankruptcy, Mizner v. Mizner, United States v. An Article of Drug . . . Bacto-Unidisk
Starrett v. Bruce
No. 380, Mise. Starrett v. Bruce, dba Bruce Trucking Co. Raymond C. Jopling, Jr., for respondent.
Brewer v. Washington
No. 601, Mise. Brewer v. Washington.
Dismuke v. Nelson
No. 580, Mise. Dismuke v. Nelson, Warden.
Sgarlato v. Klein
No. 510. Sgarlato v. Klein. Morton Liftin for petitioner. Solomon A. Klein, respondent, pro se.
Curry v. United States
No. 527. Curry et ux. v. United States. Nicholas J. Capuano for petitioners. Solicitor General Griswold and Assistant Attorney General Rogovin for the United States.
Kelley v. United States
No. 426. Kelley v. United States. Solicitor General Grisvoold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Marshall Tamor Golding for the United States.
Crowder v. Federal Communications Commission
No. 522. Crowder, trading as Harriman Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission et al. Vincent A. Pepper for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold and Henry Getter for Federal Communications Commission, and Arthur H. Schroeder
Grey v. First National Bank in Dallas
No. 513. Grey et al. v. First National Bank in Dallas et al. Gerald Meyer for petitioners. Henry C. Coke, Jr., John N. Jackson, J. Edwin Fleming, and Ernest E. Figari, Jr., for First National Bank in Dallas; E. Taylor Armstrong for First Na
Calvary Bible Presbyterian Church v. Board of Regents
No. 165. Calvary Bible Presbyterian Church of Seattle et al. v. Board of Regents of the University of Washington. William H. Botser for petitioners. John J. O’Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and James B. Wilson, Assistant Attorney
Cardinale v. Louisiana
No. 76. Cardinale v. Louisiana. Nathan Greenberg for petitioner. Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, William P. Schuler, Second Assistant Attorney General, Leander H. Perez, Jr., and Preston H. Hufjt for respondent.
Zaffarano v. Fitzpatrick
November 25, 1968. No. -. Zaffarano v. Fitzpatrick, Warden. Irving Spieler for applicant.
Stamler v. Willis
STAMLER et al. v. WILLIS et al. No. 478. Decided November 25, 1968. Albert E. Jenner, Jr., Thomas P. Sullivan, and Arthur Kinoy for appellants in No. 478. Mr. Jenner for appellant in No. 479. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney G
Farbenfabriken Bayer A. G. v. United States
FARBENFABRIKEN BAYER A. G. v. UNITED STATES. No. 504. Decided November 25, 1968. Allen F. Maulsby, Arnold M. Lerman, Max 0. Truitt, Jr., and Daniel K. Mayers for appellant. Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
Collins v. Commissioner
COLLINS v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. No. 134. Decided November 25, 1968. Donald P. Moyers for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin, Jonathan S. Cohen, and Robert J. Campbell for respondent.
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United States
ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 520. Decided November 25, 1968. S. R. Brittingham, Jr., for Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co., and Albert E. Jenner, Jr., Thomas P. Sullivan, William R. McDowe
United States v. Concentrated Phosphate Export Ass'n
UNITED STATES v. CONCENTRATED PHOSPHATE EXPORT ASSN., INC., et al. No. 29. Argued October 24, 1968. Decided November 25, 1968. Deputy Attorney General Christopher argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor General G
Universal Interpretive Shuttle Corp. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission
UNIVERSAL INTERPRETIVE SHUTTLE CORP. v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT COMMISSION et al. No. 19. Argued October 21-22, 1968. Decided November 25, 1968. Jeffrey L. Nagin argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Alle
Carroll v. President & Commissioners of Princess Anne
CARROLL et al. v. PRESIDENT AND COMMISSIONERS OF PRINCESS ANNE et al. No. 6. Argued October 21, 1968. Decided November 19, 1968. Eleanor Holmes Norton and William H. Zinman argued the cause for petitioners. With them on the brief were Melvi
World Airways, Inc. v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
No. 800, No. 969, October Term, 1967. October Term, 1967. World Airways, Inc., et al. v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., et al.; and American Society of Travel Agents, Inc. v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., et al.,
Mixon v. New York
No. 682, Mise. Mixon v. New York.
Haines v. Kingsley
No. 592, Mise. Haines et al. v. Kingsley.
Newark Stereotypers' Union No. 18 v. Newark Morning Ledger Co.
No. 498. Newark Stereotypers’ Union No. 18 v. Newark Morning Ledger Co. et al. William B. Meagher and Thomas L. Morrissey for petitioner. Bernard G. Segal, Samuel D. Slade, and Donald A. Robinson for respondents.
Van Den Wymelenberg v. United States
No. 489. Van Den Wymelenberg, Executor v. United States. Roger C. Minahan for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin, and Jonathan S. Cohen for the United States.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.