Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1968 Cases
767 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
National Labor Relations Board v. United Insurance Co. of America
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. UNITED INSURANCE CO. OF AMERICA et al. No. 178. Argued January 23-24, 1968. Decided March 6, 1968. Dominick L. Manoli argued the cause for the National Labor Relations Board, petitioner in No. 178 and respo
Federal Maritime Commission v. Aktiebolaget Svenska Amerika Linien
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION et al. v. AKTIEBOLAGET SVENSKA AMERIKA LINIEN (SWEDISH AMERICAN LINE) et al. No. 257. Argued January 25, 1968. Decided March 6, 1968. Irwin A. Seibel argued the cause for petitioners in No. 257. With him on the b
Harris v. United States
HARRIS v. UNITED STATES. No. 92. Argued January 18, 1968. Decided March 5, 1968. Paul H. Weinstein argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Laurence Levitan. Francis X. Beytagh, Jr., argued the cause for the United States.
United States v. Neifert-White Co.
UNITED STATES v. NEIFERT-WHITE CO. No. 267. Argued January 18, 1968. Decided March 5, 1968. John S. Martin, Jr., argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Weis
United States v. Habig
UNITED STATES v. HABIG et al. No. 107. Argued January 17, 1968. Decided March 5, 1968. Harris Weinstein argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin, Josep
Securities & Exchange Commission v. New England Electric System
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. NEW ENGLAND ELECTRIC SYSTEM et al. No. 305. Argued January 18, 1968.— Decided March 5, 1968. Daniel M. Friedman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Griswold, R
Sobell v. United States
No. 791. Sobell v. United States,
Epton v. New York
No. 502, No. 771, No. 702, No. 706, No. 777, No. 800, No. 803, No. 864, Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Epton v. New York, Epton v. New York, Rogers v. Stanley, State Hospital Director, Butterfield v. Gazelle, Naegle et ux.
Japanese War Notes Claimants Ass'n of the Philippines, Inc. v. United States
No. 581. No. 668. No. 720. No. 735. No. 753. No. 758. No. 768. No. 769. No. 790. No. 815. No. 820. No. 821. No. 840. No. 843. No. 850. No. 865. No. 927. No. 928. Japanese War Notes Claimants Association of the Philippines, Inc. v. United St
Armijo v. United States
No. 917, Misc. Armijo v. United States. James F. Hewitt for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Jerome M. Feit for the United States.
Comley v. United States
No. 971, Misc. Comley v. United States. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.
Levine v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.
No. 1110, Misc. Levine v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. et al.
Duarte v. California
No. 1037, Misc. Duarte v. California.
McCabe v. United States
No. 996, Misc. McCabe v. United States.
Purifoy v. Wainwright
No. 976, Misc. Purifoy v. Wainwright, Corrections Director.
Sweet v. Washington
No. 959, Misc. Sweet v. Washington.
Shurney v. Ohio.
No. 935, Misc. Shurney v. Ohio.
Ewing v. Rundle
No. 911, Misc. Ewing v. Rundle, Correctional Superintendent.
Bell v. United States
No. 895, Misc. Bell v. United States. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Hoffer v. United States
No. 881, Misc. Hoffer v. United States.
Aiello v. Ohio
No. 859, Misc. Aiello et al. v. Ohio. James R. Willis for petitioners. John T. Corrigan and Harvey R. Monck for respondent.
Brown v. United States
No. 823, Misc. Brown v. United States. Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
Brandl v. Burke
No. 628, Misc. Brandl v. Burke, Warden. Bronson C. La Follette, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and William A. Platz and Thomas A. Lockyear, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
Biot v. New York
No. 459, Misc. Biot v. New York. 0. John Rogge for petitioner. Isidore Dollmger and Daniel J. Sullivan for respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.