Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1968 Cases
767 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad
No. 859. No. 861. No. 862. No. 863. No. 933. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad Co. et al.; Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen et al. v. Akron & Barberton Belt Railroad Co. et al.; Order of Railway Co
Radio Television News Directors Ass'n v. United States
No. 993. Radio Television News Directors Assn. et al. v. United States et al. Archibald Cox, W. Theodore Pierson, Robert'M. Lichtman, Lloyd N. Cutler, J. Roger Wollenberg, Timothy B. Dyk, Lawrence J. McKay, Raymond L. Falls, Jr., Maurice Ro
Uniweld Products, Inc. v. Union Carbide Corp.
No. 903. Uniweld Products, Inc., et al. v. Union Carbide Corp. Philip J. Hirschkop for petitioners. Darrey A. Davis, Walter J. Holliday and Donald E. Van Koughnet for respondent.
Transcontinental Bus System, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board
No. 818. Transcontinental Bus System, Inc., et al. v. Civil Aeronautics Board. Howard S. Boros and Robert C. Lester for petitioners. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Joseph B. Goldman, O. D.
World Airways, Inc. v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
No. 800. No. 946. No. 969. World Airways, Inc., et al. v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., et al.; Civil Aeronautics Board v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., et al.; and American Society of Travel Agents, Inc. v. Pan American World Airwa
Daniel v. Port
No. 747, No. 864, Misc. Misc. Daniel v. Port, Judge; and Taylor v. Burke, Warden, et al.
Detenber v. American Universal Insurance
No. 483. Detenber et al., Administratrices v. American Universal Insurance Co.,
Alitalia-Linee Aeree Italiane, S. p. A. v. Lisi
No. 70. Alitalia-Linee Aeree Italiane, S. p. A. v. Lisi et al. Lee S. Kreindler on the motion.
Williamson v. Peurifoy
No. 574, October Term, 1963. Williamson et al., Executors v. Peurifoy, Judge.
McSurely v. Ratliff
January 29, 1968. No. -. McSurely et al. v. Ratliff et al. Dan Jack Combs, William M. Kunstler, Arthur Kinoy and Morton Stavis for applicants. Solicitor General Griswold for the United States in opposition.
Garafolo v. United States
GARAFOLO v. UNITED STATES. No. 866. Decided January 29, 1968.
Smith v. Noble Drilling Corp.
SMITH v. NOBLE DRILLING CORP. No. 648. Decided January 29, 1968. Samuel C. Gainsburgh for petitioner. W. Ford Reese for respondent.
Teitel Film Corp. v. Cusack
TEITEL FILM CORP. et al. v. CUSACK et al., MEMBERS OF THE MOTION PICTURE APPEAL BOARD OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO. No. 787. Decided January 29, 1968. Elmer Gertz and Leon N. Miller for appellants. Raymond F. Simon and Marvin E. Aspen for appelle
Kolod v. United States
KOLOD et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 133. Certiorari denied October 9, 1967. Rehearing and certiorari granted and case decided January 29, 1968. Edward Bennett Williams, Harold Ungar and W. H. Erickson for petitioners. Solicitor General Grisw
Smith v. Illinois
SMITH v. ILLINOIS. No. 158. Argued December 7, 1967. Decided January 29, 1968. Gerald W. Getty argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were James J. Doherty and Marshall J. Hartman. John J. O’Toole, Assistant Attorney Genera
Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. Patterson
PROVIDENT TRADESMENS BANK & TRUST CO., ADMINISTRATOR v. PATTERSON, ADMINISTRATOR, et al. No. 28. Argued November 6-7, 1967. Decided January 29, 1968. Avram O. Adler argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Abraham E. Free
Haynes v. United States
HAYNES v. UNITED STATES. No. 236. Argued October 11, 1967. Decided January 29, 1968. Charles Alan Wright argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Ernest E. Figari, Jr. Harris Weinstein argued the cause for the United State
Grosso v. United States
GROSSO v. UNITED STATES. No. 12. Argued January 18, 1967. — Reargued October 10-11, 1967. Decided January 29, 1968. Charles Alan Wright reargued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs on the reargument and on the original argument
Marchetti v. United States
MARCHETTI v. UNITED STATES. No. 2. Argued January 17-18, 1967. Reargued October 10, 1967.— Decided January 29, 1968. Jacob D. Zeldes reargued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief on the reargument were David Goldstein, Elaine S.
W. E. B. DuBois Clubs of America v. Clark
No. 515. No. 675. No. 696. No. 698. No. 197, Misc. W. E. B. DuBois Clubs of America et al. v. Clark, Attorney General, et al., Township of Springfield v. Green et al., Alpha Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Houston et al., Farmers Co-operative
Piche v. Washington
No. 812, Misc. Piche, aka Peppinos v. Washington. Francis Conklin for petitioner.
Shaw v. California
No. 754, Misc. Shaw v. California. Roger Arne-bergh and Philip E. Grey for respondent.
Sims v. California
No. 782, Misc. Sims v. California.
Matlock v. United States
No. 749, Misc. Matlock v. United States. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.