Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1969 Cases
759 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United Forest Products Co. v. Baxter
No. 1251. United Forest Products Co., Inc. v. Baxter et al. E. Eugene Davis, F. J. O’Hara, Jr., and Hugh Lynch, Jr., for petitioner. Donald A. Wine for respondents.
Diric v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
No. 1188. Diric v. Immigration and Naturalization Service. Myron L. Borawick for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Kirby W. Patterson for respondent.
Denver Union Stockyard Co. v. Denver Live Stock Commission Co.
No. 1172. Denver Union Stockyard Co. et al. v. Denver Live Stock Commission Co. Winston S. Howard for petitioners. Maurice Reuler for respondent.
Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Southern Pacific Co.
No. 1157. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. Southern Pacific Co. Ben G. Sewell for petitioner. Tom M. Davis for respondent.
Evans v. Abney
No. 1106. Evans et al. v. Abney et al. Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Charles L. Black, Jr., and Anthony G. Amsterdam for petitioners. Frank C. Jones for respondents.
Maxwell v. Bishop
No. 622. Maxwell v. Bishop, Penitentiary Superintendent. Anthony G. Amsterdam, Jack Greenberg, Michael Meltsner, Melvyn Zarr, and Charles S. Ralston on the motion.
Cipriano v. City of Houma
No. 705. Cipriano v. City of Houma et al. John V. Parker on the motion.
National Trailer Convoy, Inc. v. United States
NATIONAL TRAILER CONVOY, INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 1169. Decided May 5, 1969. William J. Lippman, Robert Joyner, and Roland Rice for appellants. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Robert W. Ginnan
Montgomery v. Burns
MONTGOMERY, DIRECTOR, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE, et al. v. BURNS et al. No. 438. Decided May 5, 1969. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Elizabeth Palmer and Donald B. Day, Deputy Attorneys General, for appel
Robinson v. Johnson
ROBINSON et al. v. JOHNSON et al. No. 67. Decided May 5, 1969. William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, Thomas E. Brannigan, Assistant Attorney General, John J. Stamos, and Daniel P. Coman for appellants.
Waggoner v. Rosenn
WAGGONER et al. v. ROSENN, SECRETARY OF PUBLIC WELFARE OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 144, Misc. Decided May 5, 1969. William C. Sennett, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Edgar B. Casper, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.
Southern Pacific Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA. No. 1050. Decided May 5, 1969. Robert L. Pierce for appellant. Mary Moran Pajalich for appellee.
United States v. Louisiana
UNITED STATES v. LOUISIANA et al. (TEXAS BOUNDARY CASE). No. 9, Orig. Decided May 31, 1960, December 4,1967, and March 3, 1969. Decree Entered December 12, 1960. Supplemental Decree Entered May 5, 1969.
Halliday v. United States
HALLIDAY v. UNITED STATES. No. 642, Misc. Decided May 5, 1969. Laurence M. Johnson for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Jerome M. Feit, and Mervyn Hamburg for the United States.
Kramer v. Caribbean Mills, Inc.
KRAMER v. CARIBBEAN MILLS, INC. No. 156. Argued January 23, 1969. Decided May 5, 1969. Eugene Gressman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Jack Banner. Dennis G. Lyons argued the cause for respondent. With him on the
Moore v. Ogilvie
MOORE et al. v. OGILVIE, GOVERNOR OF ILLINOIS, et al. No. 620. Argued March 27, 1969. Decided May 5, 1969. Richard F. Watt argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were Richard L. Mandel and Ira A. Kipnis. John J. O’Toole and
Casey v. Lambros
No. 1701, Misc. Casey v. Lambros, U. S. District Judge. Solicitor General Griswold for respondent.
Cappetta v. Florida
No. 1672, Misc. Cappetta v. Florida. Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and Charles W. Musgrove, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Sweet v. Rhay
No. 1627, Misc. Sweet v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent.
Christian v. Jackson County
No. 1616, Misc. Christian v. Jackson County.
Daubin v. California
No. 1588, Misc. Daubin v. California. Meredith M. Daubin for petitioner.
Grays v. California
No. 1521, Misc. Grays v. California.
Pagano v. United States
No. 1301, Misc. Pagano v. United States. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Jerome M. Feit, and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.
Childs v. Ohio
No. 545, Misc. Childs v. Ohio. Gerald A. Messermcm for petitioner.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.