Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1969 Cases
759 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Polur v. Botein
No. 1147. Polur v. Botein et al. Sam Polur, petitioner, pro se. Whitney North Seymour for respondents.
Smith v. James Irvine Foundation
No. 1167. Smith v. James Irvine Foundation et al. Lyndol L. Young for petitioner. Burnham Enersen for respondent James Irvine Foundation, and Reid- R. Briggs for respondents Irvine et al.
Abex Corp. v. Trustees of the Property of New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
No. 1142. Abex Corp. et al. v. Trustees of the Property of New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co. et al. JohnW. Barnett for petitioners Abex Corp. et al., and John F. Hunt, Jr., for petitioners Bethlehem Steel Corp. et al. James Wm. Mo
Gainey v. Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks
No. 1103. Gainey et al. v. Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees et al. Lawrence J. Richette for petitioners. Allen S. Olmsted M for respondent Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Fr
Breen v. Selective Service Local Board No. 16
No. 1144. Breen v. Selective Service Local Board No. 16, Bridgeport, Connecticut, et al. Emanuel Margolis, Lawrence P. Weisman, and Melvin L. Wulf for petitioner. Solicitor General Grisivold, Assistant Attorney General Ruckels-haus, Morton
First National Bank v. Dickinson
No. 777. No. 932. First National Bank in Plant City v. Dickinson, Comptroller of Florida, et al.; and Camp, Comptroller of the Currency v. Dickinson, Comptroller of Florida, et al. Solicitor General Griswold for Camp and Robert S. Edwards f
Lombardy v. Peter Kiewit Sons' Co.
LOMBARDY et al. v. PETER KIEWIT SONS’ CO. et al. No. 1168. Decided April 28, 1969. Hyman Goldman for appellants. Henry F. Walker for Peter Kiewit Sons’ Co., and Jack M. Miller and Robert L. Meyer for the State of California, appellees.
Burton v. Sills
BURTON et al. v. SILLS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, et al. No. 1158. Decided April 28, 1969. William E. Ozzard for appellants. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, pro se, Marilyn Loftus Schauer, Acting First Assistant Attor
McDonald v. Board of Election Commissioners
McDONALD et al. v. BOARD OF ELECTION COMMISSIONERS OF CHICAGO et al. No. 68. Argued November 19, 1968. Decided April 28, 1969. Stanley A. Bass argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs was Marshall Patner. Stanley T. Kusper, J
United States v. Bacto-Unidisk
UNITED STATES v. AN ARTICLE OF DRUG . . . BACTO-UNIDISK .... No. 343. Argued January 23, 1969. Decided April 28, 1969. Lawrence G. Wallace argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Griswold, Assist
National Labor Relations Board v. Wyman-Gordon Co.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. WYMAN-GORDON CO. No. 463. Argued March 3, 1969. Decided April 23, 1969. Solicitor General Griswold argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Francis X. Beytagh, Jr., Arnold Ordman, Dominic
Bingler v. Johnson
BINGLER, DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. JOHNSON et al. No. 473. Argued March 3-4, 1969. Decided April 23, 1969. Harris Weinstein argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant At
Frazier v. Cupp
FRAZIER v. CUPP, WARDEN. No. 643. Argued February 26, 1969. Decided April 22, 1969. Howard M. Feuerstein argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was R. A. Nahstoll. Arlen Specter argued the cause for respondent. On the brief
Davis v. Mississippi
DAVIS v. MISSISSIPPI. No. 645. Argued February 26-27, 1969. Decided April 22, 1969. Melvyn Zarr argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Jack Greenberg, Michael Meltsner, Anthony G. Amsterdam, and Jack Young. G. Garland L
Reece v. United States
No. 656, No. 901, No. 1276, No. 1332, No. 1362, No. 1469, Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Reece v. United States et al., Watson v. Schneckloth, Conservation Center Superintendent, Jennison v. United States, McGurrin v. Shovlin, State Ho
United States v. Louisiana
No. 9, Orig. United States v. Louisiana et al.
Jones v. Maryland
No. 1629, Misc. Jones v. Maryland.
McKinney v. Boyle
No. 1545, Misc. McKinney v. Boyle et al. Harold R. Scoville for respondents.
Horton v. New York
No. 1450, Misc. Horton v. New York.
Silver v. Dickson
No. 1427, Misc. Silver v. Dickson et al.
Edwards v. Kansas
No. 964, Misc. Edwards v. Kansas. Kent Frizzell, Attorney General of Kansas, and Edward G. Collister, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Leighton v. One William Street Fund, Inc.
No. 1112. Leighton v. One William Street Fund, Inc., et al. Arthur W. Murphy for respondent One William Street Fund, Inc., Benjamin C. Milner III and Anthony L. Fletcher for respondents Lehman Brothers et al., and Harvey D. Myerson for resp
Best Medium Publishing Co. v. Varnish
No. 1093. Best Medium Publishing Co., Inc. v. Varnish. Irwin M. Taylor for petitioner. Ernest Allen Cohen for respondent.
Balistrieri v. United States
No. 1070. Balistrieri v. United States. Edward Bennett Williams, Harold Ungar, and Maurice Walsh for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Walters, Joseph M. Howard, and Charles A. McNelis for the United States.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.