Atty. Michael J. McMaster
Michael is a member of the Workers’ Compensation Department where he represents employers, insurance carriers, and third-party administrators in Pennsylvania. Prior to joining Marshall Dennehey, Michael clerked for the Honorable Charles J.
Profile Summary
About Michael J. McMaster at a glance
Michael J. McMaster is an Associate based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, practicing at Marshall Dennehey. They have 5+ years of legal experience, licensed to practice since 2021. Their practice focuses on workers comp. Admitted to practice in Pennsylvania (2021). Educated at Drexel University Thomas R. Kline School of Law (J.D., 2021) and Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (B.A., 2018). Active member of Associations & memberships Philadelphia Bar Association, Workers' Compensation Section. Serands clients in Philadelphia, PA and the surrounding metropolitan area.
Want to Get Service From This Attorney?
Sign up free and choose one of the two methods below.
Have a legal question? Sign up free, submit it through the Ask the Attorney module and receive a focused answer from a specialist.
- Free to ask a question
- Answers from specialist attorneys
- Optional private / anonymous question
Request an online video meeting or an in-person consultation at the attorney's office. Pick a time that works for you and share the details securely.
- Online video meeting
- In-person at the attorney's office
- Secure messaging and payment
About
- Michael is a member of the Workers’ Compensation Department where he represents employers, insurance carriers, and third-party administrators in Pennsylvania
- Prior to joining Marshall Dennehey, Michael clerked for the Honorable Charles J. Cunningham III of the Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas here in Philadelphia
- During his clerkship, Michael assisted Judge Cunningham in ruling on pretrial motions, drafting opinions, and overall management of the courtroom
- Michael Graduated from Drexel University Kline School of Law in 2021
- While attending law school, Michael had the opportunity to participate in the Federal Litigation and Appeals Clinic where he represented clients from Liberia, Angola, and Ghana seeking asylum due to the persecution they each faced in their native countries
- Michael also participated in several pro bono projects including immigration related projects organized by the Brehon Law Society and HIAS, as well as expungement clinics organized by the Legal Aid Society of Southeastern Pennsylvania
- When Michael is outside of work, he enjoys reading non-fiction, watching sports, listening to podcasts, photography, and hanging out with his dog Babe
- Classes/Seminars Taught •PA Workers’ Compensation Law: How to Produce the Best IME Reports, webinar, November 6, 2025 Published Works •“Pennsylvania Supreme Court Overrules Specific Loss Precedent, Grants Benefits to Estate of Deceased Worker,” Defense Digest, 2025-09-01, Vol. 31, No. 3 •'AI in Workers' Compensation: Are We There Yet?' The Legal Intelligencer, August 9, 2024 Thought Leadership Defense Digest Pennsylvania Supreme Court Overrules Specific Loss Precedent, Grants Benefits to Estate of Deceased Worker September 1, 2025 Key Points:Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that the estate of a claimant is entitled to the payment of specific loss benefits because the claimant died from a work-related injury.Section 410 of the Workers’ Compensation Act states that an estate is entitled to payment of benefits when a claimant dies before the final adjudication of a claim and when there are no dependents
- This decision affects the settlement analysis of claims that include a specific loss and has greatly increased the potential exposure of such cases where the liability for payment of the specific loss benefits does not extinguish with the death of the claimant due to the work-related injury
- The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has expanded the scope of recoverable workers’ compensation benefits by holding that specific loss benefits may survive a claimant’s work-related death and be payable to the estate when no dependents exist
- In overruling longstanding precedent, the court clarified that Section 410 of the Workers’ Compensation Act provides a distinct pathway for such recovery, significantly impacting how catastrophic injury claims are valued and resolved.FactsIn Steets v
- Celebration Fireworks (WCAB), 335 A.3d 1076 (Pa. 2025), the claimant, Christina Steets, was working for Celebration Fireworks Inc., the employer, when she sustained a serious injury following a firework explosion
- The employer accepted liability for the injury in a Notice of Compensation Payable and paid the claimant temporary total disability benefits
- The accepted injury was described as the amputation of multiple body parts
- The claimant’s condition deteriorated, and she filed Claim and Review Petitions, seeking to add a number of additional injuries, including loss of use of both arms
- The workers’ compensation judge granted the Review Petition and awarded specific loss benefits
- Thus, the claimant would be entitled to 840 weeks of specific loss benefits following the expiration of her total disability benefits
- The employer appealed to the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, which affirmed the workers’ compensation judge’s decision
- The employer then appealed to the Commonwealth Court, which ultimately affirmed the rulings below.During the pendency of the employer’s appeal to the Commonwealth Court, the claimant died from a complication of her work-related injury
- Following her death, her estate filed Claim, Review, and Penalty Petitions, seeking payment of funeral expenses, specific loss benefits, and a penalty based upon the employer’s alleged failure to pay previously awarded specific loss benefits
- The estate was comprised solely of the claimant’s non-dependent sister
- The workers’ compensation judge granted the petition for funeral expenses as the death was work-related
- However, denied were the Review and Penalty Petitions regarding the payment of specific loss benefits
- The Appeal Board affirmed the decision, and the estate appealed to the Commonwealth Court
- The Commonwealth Court issued a split decision in which it affirmed the judge’s ruling that the specific loss benefits were not payable
- The estate appealed to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court
- It requested that the court overrule Estate of Harris, 845 A.2d 239 (Pa
- Cmwlth. 2004), where the Commonwealth Court had held that Section 306(g) of the Act was the exclusive means by which specific loss benefits survive the death of the worker
- ResultThere were essentially two distinct questions in the Estate of Steets case: (1) do specific loss benefits survive following the claimant’s death caused by the work-related injuries
- and (2) if the specific loss benefits survive, can they be paid to the estate of the claimant?
- The Supreme Court held that the Act does not categorically bar recovery of specific loss benefits when a worker dies from their work-related injuries
- In reaching this decision, the court focused on Sections 306, 307, and 410 of the Workers’ Compensation Act
- First, the court acknowledged that Sections 306 and 307 limit the survivability of specific loss benefits to situations where the claimant died from causes unrelated to the work injury
- However, the court stated that Section 410 provides a distinct form of relief when the claimant dies prior to the final adjudication of their claim from a work-related injury or cause
- The plain language of Section 410 states that specific loss benefits may be paid to the estate of the claimant where there are no dependents to inherit
- Therefore, the estate is entitled to the payment of the specific loss benefits
- This case explicitly overrules the holding in Estate of Harris and opens the door to a broader application of the specific loss provisions in the Act
- ImpactEstate of Steets expands the ability of a claimant’s beneficiaries to receive specific loss benefits following the death of the claimant, regardless of whether the death was caused by the work-related injury or an unrelated cause
- This will affect the value of specific loss cases moving forward and will alter settlement strategy and claim handling
- In the event of a serious injury with the potential for, or realization of, a specific loss benefit, it is no longer the case that the right to the specific loss would extinguish should the claimant die from the work-related injury
- Instead, the specific loss benefit will have to be calculated and considered as a part of the case when discussing the potential outcome or settlement of the case
- While this decision represents a shift in workers’ compensation precedent in Pennsylvania, it certainly is not a “sky-is-falling” scenario
- The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rested its decision primarily on Section 410 and the fact that the claimant died prior to the final adjudication of her claim
- Therefore, this decision does not stand for the unequivocal statement that when a claimant dies from work-related injuries and is entitled to specific loss benefits, their estate is entitled to payment of specific loss benefits
- Mike is a member of the Workers’ Compensation Department and can be reached at (215) 575-2859 or MJMcMaster@mdwcg.com
- Defense Digest, Vol. 31, No. 3, September 2025, is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers
- This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship
- ATTORNEY ADVERTISING pursuant to New York RPC 7.1. 2025 Marshall Dennehey
- All Rights Reserved
- This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm
- For reprints, contact tamontemuro@mdwcg.com
- AI in Workers' Compensation: Are We There Yet?
- August 9, 2024 Workers’ compensation is a field of law that is particularly suited to the application of artificial intelligence, especially in the processing and analyzing of data
Practice Areas Explained
Michael J. McMaster's Areas of Practice
Each practice area below reflects the types of cases Michael J. McMaster handles, with a brief overview of what that area of law covers.
Workers compensation lawyers help injured workers get medical care, lost wages, and disability benefits. Free consult, no fee unless you win.
Michael J. McMaster is one of 55,389 workers comp attorneys indexed nationally. Browse workers comp attorneys in Pennsylvania →
Jurisdictional Context
Why local counsel matters in Pennsylvania
Practicing law in Pennsylvania. Legal matters in Pennsylvania are governed by state-specific rules of civil and criminal procedure, statutes of limitations, and substantive law. Cases originating in Philadelphia are typically filed in the local municipal court or the appropriate Pennsylvania state district court, depending on subject matter and amount in controversy. An attorney licensed in Pennsylvania brings working knowledge of local procedural deadlines, judicial practices in this andnue, and the substantive law that applies to cases brought here. Out-of-state attorneys generally cannot represent clients in Pennsylvania courts without local counsel or pro hac vice admission.
Looking for additional Pennsylvania attorneys? Browse all attorneys in Philadelphia or all attorneys in Pennsylvania.
Frequently Asked
Common questions about Michael J. McMaster
Where is Michael J. McMaster's law office located?
What practice areas does Michael J. McMaster handle?
How long has Michael J. McMaster practiced law?
Where did Michael J. McMaster go to law school?
How can I contact Michael J. McMaster for a consultation?
Practice Areas
Education
Bar Admissions
Reviews
No reviews yet.