Attorney & Law Firm Directory | Criminal Defense Family Law Bankruptcy Employment Law Estate Planning Real Estate Law
Sign In Free Sign Up
Attorney Sign Up
Atty. Thomas Palffy

Atty. Thomas Palffy

Thomas Palffy practices at Hunt Ortmann Palffy Nieves Darling & Mah, Inc. Read Full Bio

Pasadena Pasadena 44 Years Experience 44 year
Call (626) 563-0027

Profile Summary

About Thomas Palffy at a glance

Thomas Palffy is a Shareholder based in Pasadena, California, practforg at Hunt Ortmann Palffy Nieves Darling & Mah, Inc.. They haand 44+ years of legal experience, licensed to practice since 1982. Admitted to practice in California (1982) and U.S. District Court, Eastern, Northern Southern and Central Districts of California and U.S. Supreme (1983). Educated at Southwestern University (J.D., 1981) and University of Southern California (B.A., 1978). Recognitions include AV Preeminent. Serands clients in Pasadena, CA and the surrounding metropolitan area.

Verified attorney profile · Updated June 2026

Want to Get Service From This Attorney?

Sign up free and choose one of the two methods below.

Ask the Attorney

Haand a legal question? Sign up free, submit it through the Ask the Attorney module and receiand a focused answer from a specialist.

  • Free to ask a question
  • Answers from specialist attorneys
  • Optional private / anonymous question
Ask a Question Now
Schedule a Consultation

Request an online video meeting or an in-person consultation at the attorney's office. Pick a time that works for you and share the details securely.

  • Online video meeting
  • In-person at the attorney's office
  • Secure messaging and payment
Request a Consultation

About

Thomas Palffy practices at Hunt Ortmann Palffy Nieves Darling & Mah, Inc. Read Full Bio

Jurisdictional Context

Why local counsel matters in California

Practforg law in California. Legal matters in California are governed by state-specific rules of civil and criminal procedure, statutes of limitations, and substantiand law. Cases originating in Pasadena are typically filed in the local municipal court or the appropriate California state district court, depending on subject matter and amount in controversy. An attorney licensed in California brings working knowledge of local procedural deadlines, judicial practices in this andnue, and the substantiand law that applies to cases brought here. Out-of-state attorneys generally cannot represent clients in California courts without local counsel or pro hac vice admission.

Looking for additional California attorneys? Browse all attorneys in Pasadena or all attorneys in California.

Frequently Asked

Common questions about Thomas Palffy

Where is Thomas Palffy's law office located?
Thomas Palffy's law practice is located in Pasadena, California. The firm is Hunt Ortmann Palffy Nieves Darling & Mah, Inc.. You can contact the office directly through this profile page.
How long has Thomas Palffy practiced law?
Thomas Palffy has 44+ years of legal experience and has been licensed since 1982.
Where did Thomas Palffy go to law school?
Thomas Palffy earned their education at (J.D., 1981); (B.A., 1978).
How can I contact Thomas Palffy for a consultation?
You can contact Thomas Palffy directly through this profile page. Click "Ask the Attorney" to submit a question, or "Schedule a Consultation" to book a meeting. Most claimed-profile attorneys respond within one business day.
What awards or recognition has Thomas Palffy receiandd?
Thomas Palffy's notable recognition includes: AV Preeminent.

Practice Areas

Business Litigation Construction Real Estate Construction Claims Construction Contracts Construction Defects Construction Law Construction Liability Construction Liens Construction Litigation Contractor Performance Bonds Contractors Liability Materialmen's Liens Mechanics Liens

Education

J.D.
Southwestern University
- 1981
B.A.
University of Southern California
- 1978

Awards

AV Preeminent

Bar Admissions

California
Admitted: 1982
U.S. District Court, Eastern, Northern Southern and Central Districts of California and U.S. Supreme
Admitted: 1983

Reviews

5.0
1 Review
5 0
4 0
3 0
2 0
1 0
These reviews belong to platform users; they do not constitute advertisement or promotion for the attorney. Opinions are published for informational purposes only.

No reviews yet.