I think you might find the US Supreme Court's decision in Missouri v. McNeely of some interest. You can find it at: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/11-1425_cb8e.pdf I suggest that you retain an experienced DWI attorney to represent you without delay. Also, refrian from speaking about your case with anyone other than your attorney.
In Wisconsin and most states, you have a right to have an additional test done at government expense. That is, you could have taken a breath test in addition to the blood test. If you refused the blood test requested, this would be a refusal even if you were willing to take a breath test.
Whether or not the blood test results can be used in court is a separate matter. Generally, no, not without a warrant. You need a lawyer for this, now, before court. Often people think that because it isn’t a murder case, a drunk driving case is simple. Nothing could be further from the truth. These cases can be among the most complex a criminal defense lawyer handles. The government is willing to spend an incredible amount of money to convict you though. They will have expert witnesses available for consultation and trial. It is certainly not a do-it-yourself situation, nor a situation where you want someone getting on-the-job training.
That you have been charged or that some gizmo says your alcohol level was at a certain level does not mean that you are guilty. It certainly does not mean that you will be proven guilty using competent, valid evidence.
Field sobriety “tests” are designed to give police a reason to arrest. You cannot “pass” them. The police will admit that almost a third of healthy young adults who take these tests without any alcohol will be judged to be “under the influence” – and that assumes they are properly administered!
After even a first drunk driving conviction, you may face employment discrimination. You will certainly be charged higher for insurance. Having such a conviction will also make you a target for drunk driving arrest in future interactions with police. You will automatically become a suspect.
You will want a lawyer who is familiar with field sobriety “tests,” perhaps one who is certified to administer these tests. You will want a lawyer familiar with the weaknesses of the contraptions that are used to report alcohol or drug levels. You want an experienced trial lawyer, used to cross-examining police officers. Police officers are practiced, experienced witnesses.
That is, you want an experienced drunk driving defense lawyer, whether you call the offense DUI, OWI, DWI, OUI, or drugged driving.
If any answer on helps you, mine or someone else’s, please mark it as "helpful" or "best answer" to help know which answers to show others.
Thank you.
--- Experienced DUI/DWI/OWI/Drunk Driving Lawyer in Madison, Wisconsin
http://addbalance.com/drunk_driving_lawyer.htm
--- Facebook Page Madison (Dane County) Wisconsin Drunk Driving / OWI / DWI / DUI Lawyer
http://www.facebook.com/MadisonWiDrunkDrivingLawyer
--- Field sobriety "tests" – Madison (Dane County) Wisconsin DUI / DWI / OWI / Drunk Driving lawyer
http://addbalance.com/fieldsobrietytests.htm
--- Drugged Driving/DUI/DWI/Drunk Driving with Prescription Drugs – Madison (Dane County) Wisconsin
http://addbalance.com/duidrugs.htm
--- Which Offenses Count as Priors in Wisconsin? - Madison Dane County Wisconsin DUI OWI Drunk Driving Lawyer answers
http://addbalance.com/duimath.htm
--- Ten Days to Save Your License - Administrative Suspension and Refusals in Madison (Dane County) Wisconsin
http://addbalance.com/duitendaywarning.htm
DISCLAIMER:
Confidential information should not be disclosed in this Internet forum.
I am an experienced Wisconsin drunk driving (DUI/OWI/DWI) defense lawyer practicing in Madison (Dane County) Wisconsin. The laws in each jurisdiction can be very different. I cannot give legal advice over the Internet nor can I establish an attorney client relationship with you.
If something I say disagrees with what your own lawyer is telling you, you should rely on your lawyer who is familiar with you, your entire case, the local courts and practices.
The short answer is "it depends." In certain cases, the police are entitled to obtain a blood test from the suspect, but generally, the police have to obtain a court order signed by a judge. Usually, this is when there has been an accident, especially one with damage to another's property or someone was hurt.
If there was an accident involved this might be the reason. You should make no statements to the police or anyone before you speak with a DWI attorney.
You don't get to refuse the breath test without consequences (driving privilege or the state arguing consciousness of guilt). However, once you are done with that you can request a blood test. If you do, the police only duty is to give you a phone and a phone book. You have to get your own tech to administer the blood test. But, if too much time goes by before the tech gets there--then the prosecutor will argue that the elapse time made you sober up.
It is not usually a choice, if there was an accident, the officer might get a court order to get blood taken because it is a more accurate reflection of your BAC at the time the blood is drawn. You should retain a DWI attorney immediately to discuss all of the case facts so they can determine if the evidence may be suppressible.
Richard C. SouthardCriminal Defense AttorneyNew York, NY ·
The short answer is no. You don't have a choice other than to refuse and have your driving privileges likely revoked and your refusal used as evidence of your guilt.