Can a Judge tell a corporation they MUST have a lawyer for a small claims appeal if that is incorrect?
The small claims appeal section on the courts.ca.gov website says this:
"Because this case is in the civil division of the superior court (and NOT in small claims court), you (and the other side) are allowed to bring a lawyer to represent you in the new trial." - Nowhere does it say a corporation MUST have one. - Two weeks later the appeal was heard in front of another judge who stated the lawyer rule as written above. I won 10,000 in small claims and lost in the appeal I believe due to the fact that the deck was stacked against me. It was obvious the corporation did not intend to fight me with an attorney since they showed up that first day without one. If they intended to, fine. But, I believe my rights to a fair trial were violated by that first judge. Do I have any recourse here?
